Posted on 09/21/2005 2:15:07 PM PDT by forty_years
A headline on the UK’s Guardian today reads, “Age cannot wither him,” referring to Gore Vidal. The author, Emma Brockes, pays homage at the feet of Vidal, praising him as an “aristocrat, intellectual and prolific novelist, playwright, and essayist,” flattering “his ongoing radicalism,” and gleefully exclaiming that he “is as outspoken as ever.” But Vidal’s left-wing hubris and insanity does not completely escape the awe-struck Brockes… sort of.
Brockes interviewed Vidal at his “grand old palazzo” in Italy. She notes that Vidal just sold this palace for “£9.5m” ($17,173,147.00) so that he could move to another house he owns in Hollywood. This conspicuous wealth sounds like aristocracy. Oh, yes, the Guardian calls Vidal an “aristocrat” in the same article that describes his “radicalism.” Is Vidal redistributing his wealth to the poor? Sorry to sound cliché, but, “What would Jesus do?”
Brockes takes note:
It has always been hard to work out how much of Vidal's aloofness is genuine. He plays up to his image as the foremost American aristocrat, slow in speech, noble in gesture, with a confidence in his own opinion that derives as much from background - his grandfather was a senator, his father a founder of the airline TWA and he had a stepfather in common with Jackie Kennedy - as from expertise.
One has to wonder why Vidal is moving back to America – no less to the gleaming mansions of Hollywood:
With some pride, Vidal refers to himself as the neo-conservatives' "public enemy number one". His radicalism stretches across many issues, all of which come back to his basic proposition that there is no such thing as democracy in America. Neither, he says, is there freedom of the press nor political accountability and the last American election was rigged.
He offers a pathetic attempt at proving that, “the last American election was rigged:”
"Congressman John Conyers," he says, "Democrat for Michigan, went out to Ohio with a team of researchers examining the theft of votes on a huge scale. So Conyers made a report and published it. I wrote the preface. And I followed its lack of attention. Not one review of the congressman's book has been mentioned anywhere in the papers, or on television, not one. We are tightly censored and controlled and have been for decades."
Vidal must have been at his “grand old palazzo” during last year’s presidential elections, surveying the vote “rigging” from on aristocratic high. I was in Ohio. The Democrats made all sorts of noises, and had sent forth an army of lawyers into the state to investigate this “rigging.” The Dems quietly retreated from the Buckeye State precisely because they could find no evidence of any type of irregularities. On the other hand, the Defiance County, Ohio sheriff arrested a man on October 19, 2004 for filing 124 falsified voter registration forms "…in exchange for crack cocaine from a Toledo woman working on behalf of the NAACP’s voter registration drive." This was not widely reported, but documented nonetheless.
Dan Rather, the New York Times, the LA Times, etc., etc., would have certainly let us know if anything done by Republicans was found. Oh, but Vidal has an answer for everything:
Brockes helps Vidal first:
He may well be right about the malevolence of corporate America.
Then she leads us to “understand,” while taking pause at Vidal’s madness:
But like most conspiracy theorists, Vidal's beliefs are so grand - for example, that the New York Times, General Electric and the nuclear industry are in cahoots to hoodwink the American people - that they rely on a rather optimistic view of human competence. When Clinton faced impeachment, Vidal said that Monica Lewinsky was a plant introduced to the White House by the tobacco industry to bring the president down.
With such “answers,” Vidal can back himself into any type of theoretical corner – and still claim that he is “right.”
What is so frightening about Vidal is that droves of left-wingers believe his drivel. Conspiracy theories are fun to believe precisely because they are almost impossible to prove or disprove; just like watching the X-Files. It is a fantasy world that suits a particular personality type.
Unfortunately, this personality type is one of limited mentality. Not to say that there are no smart left-wingers, like Christopher Hitchens, but he is the exception rather than the rule. The Left has devolved into a cesspool of conspiracy theories.
How can one lose an argument if that argument cannot be proved or disproved? How safe it is to know something for sure without having to think about it. “It is true because Gore Vidal and Noam Chomsky said so.” Never mind that the two old codgers are lunatics. It suits the left-wing belief system so the acolytes believe it. It fits the simple-minded mentality to have one person, place, or thing to focus all mental energies upon – President Bush, in this case. Need Vidal's views on Bush be repeated here ("It's a corrupt administration -- as they have proven to the whole world.")?
Instead of being unified against Islamism, almost half the country is concentrated on hating President Bush, and has its collective head in the sand either rationalizing terrorism or pretending it does not exist.
The obsessive hatred of Bush is a pathological avoidance mechanism. Since the "opposition" to the war against Islamism is terrified of terrorists, it channels its fear into hatred for the president.
The Left somehow sees the war against Islamo-fascism as an extension of the civil rights movement; as some type of black (e.g., Muslims) against white (e.g., the West) conflict; the usual “rich vs. poor” story.
Since "liberals" like Vidal feel guilty about living their comfortable lives, cannot stand to bear the sight of the poor or oppressed, they lash out in all sorts of strange ways at the society in which they live so comfortably.
The "opposition" knows deep down that Islamism is a threat to the very fabric of civilization. But its fear of doing the right thing causes intense emotional conflict. In other words, the appeasers know they should act, but are afraid to, so they suppress the desire to act. The repressed feelings must be expressed though, so they are flung in Bush's direction. This avoidance will lead to the destruction of civilization, if its proponents prevail.
The only saving grace to all this simplemindedness is the fact that a majority of American voters are not so simpleminded. They elected a Republican congress and president. Hopefully, they will do so one or two more times.
http://netwmd.com/articles/article1183.html
Vidal is the kind of pseudo-intellectual who refers to the Judeo-Christian Deity as a "tribal sky-god".
Gore Vidal is a senile old queen.
Of course, he was like this before he got old and turned senile, so that's not an excuse.
He did write some pretty decent history/novel; I thought Lincoln was a interesting portrait.
William F. Buckley Jr. to Vidal, Chicago 1968
Why?
It's pretty obvious from his constant mention of McVeigh's appearance that he had a crush on McVeigh.
That was the beginning of the end for intelligence debate on TV (by the way, FC was a great book).
oops, "intelligent"
How sad that he has spent his entire lifetime living in his fantasy.
Wonder what he thinks of Allah? Hmmmmm... Putative "intellectuals" like this make me want to vomit-there are people living in trailers who have barely finished high school, with far more brains and common sense than these gilded elitist twits.
And BTW isn't he a distant relative of Algore?
And BTW isn't he a distant relative of Algore?
Gore and Carter both, though his side of the family were staunch republicans.
The Guardian article does mention his late "partner of 55 years"
It's too bad he didn't do more acting. He cut a fine figure of a villain in the sci-fi movie "Gattacca."
The Left somehow sees the war against Islamo-fascism as an extension of the civil rights movement; as some type of black (e.g., Muslims) against white (e.g., the West) conflict; the usual “rich vs. poor” story.
It's not rich/poor at all. It's "us" vs. "the other" (with "us" as the eternal xenophobic bad guy and "the other" as the pure and righteous downtrodden revolutionaries). In the United States the Black/white divide is the most common one used by the Left (and the "palaeo" Right) for this purpose.
If you want to see how little poverty and wealth have to do with anything, note that wealth Blacks are not reviled but have been encouraged since the days of W.E.B. DuBois' "talented tenth" to contribute their resources for the sake of the Volk (a form of "class collaboration" all liberals decry in the historical example of Mussolini and Italy). Meanwhile, midwestern dirt poor whites who hate the rich, bankers, etc., are attacked as dangerously incipient fascist "rightwing regresso populists" who won't rest until they've hanged every Jew to a lamppost and replaced Federal Reserve notes with Monopoly money.
See? It's not class it all. It's almost an incarnation of a metaphysical concept with "the other" = "the holy" (haqadosh).
It's ironic to consider that just over one hundred years ago the ancestors of today's "dangerous rightwing extremists" were voting for William Jennings Bryan and Eugene V. Debs and the ancestors of today's coastal poofter aristocrats were pouring their considerable wealth into the coffers of William McKinley.
Hey . . . maybe William McKinley was the Secret Ruler of the World back then!
Why?
It's pretty obvious from his constant mention of McVeigh's appearance that he had a crush on McVeigh.
"Alfalfa Gore" Vidal is related somehow to populist Democratic Senator Thomas Gore of Oklahoma, the famous "blind senator."
Hey, maybe American radicalism is returning to its heartland cradle. Will the "blue states" return to their Federalist/Anti-Masonic/Whig/Republican roots as well?
Vidal is almost a poster child for the Left: ineffective, pretentious, effete, queer, irrelevant, yet convinced of his own indispensability. He's the archetypal girly-man. I've got houseplants with more testosterone than that wrinkled old fairy.
At the risk of being not only misunderstood but of whipping a dead horse back to life, I'll ask it again: why don't people like this ever criticize Black Fundamentalists? And why don't they ever criticize people like him?
"Vidal is the kind of pseudo-intellectual who refers to the Judeo-Christian Deity as a "tribal sky-god"."
I forget. Which god does Vidal kneel to? the Iron god of Government. Or the Golden Calve of "Buggery" ?
"Now listen, you queer, stop calling me a crypto-Nazi or I?ll sock you in you goddamn face and you?ll stay plastered."
Gotta love that Buckley.
I guess after all these years it is a given? Or, is the thought of a wrinkly old fag sickening to the gay sycophants who adore him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.