Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Allstate won't pay Katrina flood claims
MarketWatch ^ | Sept. 20, 2005 | Alistair Barr

Posted on 09/21/2005 10:01:23 AM PDT by george76

Insurer's operating chief responds to Mississippi suit...

Allstate Corp. won't pay flooding claims stemming from Hurricane Katrina, Chief Operating Officer Tom Wilson said on Tuesday, in a direct challenge to a lawsuit filed last week by Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood.

Controversy has emerged surrounding the devastating flooding that followed the storm. Standard homeowners' insurance policies typically exclude flooding, partly because a national, government-run program covers those risks. However, many homeowners hit by Katrina may not have bought this extra coverage.

Mississippi's Hood sued Allstate and four other leading insurers in the state on Sept. 16, arguing that their flood exclusions should be voided and that they should pay flood claims.

"Exhibit one for us will be just the national flood-insurance programs -- advertising programs, which they put on very aggressively every year," he said. "People know this is a separate coverage, so we're not having many issues with our customers."

Allstate's Wilson did concede that there will be "issues" when assessing what damage was caused by wind and what was the result of flooding.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: allstate; insurance; katrina; rita
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-189 next last
To: dfwgator

From what I was told by someone that had their house flooded in a Florida hurricane, they look at the high water mark in your house. The water stains the wall.

It it's above the high water mark you won't have much trouble claiming it. It it's below the high water mark, you'll need to prove that the damage being covered wasn't caused by flood waters.


141 posted on 09/21/2005 11:19:21 AM PDT by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Euphemy

Here's the National Flood Insurance Progrems definition of a flood.

Flood insurance covers direct physical loss caused by gflood.h In simple terms, a flood is an excess of water on land that is normally dry. Here is the official definition used by the National Flood Insurance Program.

A flood is 1)A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of two or more acres of normally dry land area or of two or more properties (at least one of which is your property) from: 2) Overflow of inland or tidal waters; 3) Unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source; 4) Mudflow*; or 5) Collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or similar body of water as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding anticipated cyclical levels that result in a flood as defined above.h *Mudflow is defined as gA river of liquid and flowing mud on the surfaces of normally dry land areas, as when earth is carried by a current of

See www.FEMA.gov for more


142 posted on 09/21/2005 11:25:25 AM PDT by Texasbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

I pay over $1000 for flood insurance (seperate from Home Owners and seperate from the Wind and Rain Policy). If the insurance company is judged having to pay, will my mortgage company "allow" me to dump it? I doubt that very much - in fact, I'll probably wind up paying over $2000 a year for flood insurance.


143 posted on 09/21/2005 11:39:48 AM PDT by msflea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

"Lighten up. My point was that there could be an opportunity for Allstates smaller competitors here."

Buying for ten and selling for nine is not called opportunity its called bankruptcy.


144 posted on 09/21/2005 11:40:06 AM PDT by Jacvin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

I pay over $1000 for flood insurance (seperate from Home Owners and seperate from the Wind and Rain Policy). If the insurance company is judged having to pay, will my mortgage company "allow" me to dump it? I doubt that very much - in fact, I'll probably wind up paying over $2000 a year for flood insurance.


145 posted on 09/21/2005 11:42:10 AM PDT by msflea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

Looking at a water mark only works when one has a wall or house left standing.

And I'll try to explain the State of Mississippi's insurance nuances (to the best of my understanding), if there is a policy that covers wind damage but excludes flood damage, the insurance company has to pay for the damages it covered. The problem here right now is that the insurance companies are not paying anyone for any wind damage, they are just saying "flood and not a dime" on houses that are just gone.

I dont think that insurance companies should have to pay for things they didn't cover, but I think if they sold a hurricane policy, they should pay for hurricane damage. And silly me, I think a hurricane wind driven wall of water is hurricane damage.

Our designated flood plains are alongside rivers and bays, but the beaches are on the Gulf of Mexico. I've never in my lifetime heard of the Gulf of Mexico "flooding", have you?


146 posted on 09/21/2005 11:50:30 AM PDT by Euphemy (Proud to be a South Mississippian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
How do you determine what was damaged by wind, and by water. Something with water damage, could have been conceivably damaged by the wind first.

Usually doesn't matter. If a home is compeltely blown away by the wind, but the entire neighborhood is underwater and a total loss, they can legitimately deny any claim. The house WOULD have been lost due to a non-covered event.

It's trickier in more complicated situations.

147 posted on 09/21/2005 11:54:15 AM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: george76

The "good hands people" like your premium payments, but they apparently don't care so much for your claims...


148 posted on 09/21/2005 11:56:06 AM PDT by Bush2000 (Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasbound; ShutUpandSing; dmz

Flood maps are available online:
http://www.esri.com/hazards/makemap.html

http://www.msc.fema.gov/states.shtml

Background article from Louisiana State Univ:

http://www.agctr.lsu.edu/en/family_home/hazards_and_threats/floods_hurricanes/flood_maps_permits/Flood+Insurance+Rate+Maps+FIRMs.htm

Detailed "how to" use the FEMA online maps (requires pdf file reader):

http://cwcb.state.co.us/flood_watch/onlineFEMAissued%20FIRMs.pdf

= = = = == = = = = = == = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
"Is storm surge considered the same as a flood?"

Yes, storm surge is considered a flood.

"Are all the homes and businesses in the gulf on federally designated flood plains?"

Maybe not all, but a good number. You can order flood maps from FEMA or NFIP - I don't remmeber which.


149 posted on 09/21/2005 11:59:44 AM PDT by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
If the storm pushed a tree into the house, Allstate would have to pay.

Yup. Because a falling tree is covered. If the storm pushed the water into the house through the storm surge, Allstate should pay, unless a rider specifically excludes 'wind driven water' or all water damage.

Nope. And the standard policy DOES exclude damage caused by "rising waters"... which this certainly was.

Man... if you choose to live on the ocean and BELOW sea level... you've got to plan accordingly.

150 posted on 09/21/2005 12:01:47 PM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: IMRight

IMRight said: Man... if you choose to live on the ocean and BELOW sea level... you've got to plan accordingly.


That's New Orleans that's below sea level, not Mississippi.


151 posted on 09/21/2005 12:10:15 PM PDT by Euphemy (Proud to be a South Mississippian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
I'm not so sure this is as cut and dried as most think. NO flooding due to a levee break is a true flood IMHO. But what about buildings that aren't in a flood plain but were hit by the extraordinary storm surge? Isn't the surge a result of the high winds? I'm not picking sides, but I see the argument.

The water that poured through the levee breaches was driven into Lake Pontchartrain by the wind, too. The conventional wisdom is that "water that comes from the ground level up" is flood damage, no matter how it got there. Water that enters a structure from above, through wind-damaged walls or roof, is covered by the standard (non-flood) homeowners or commercial property policy.

You can bet that people who didn't have flood coverage have been busy inflicting post-Katrina roof damage before the adjusters view the property. Yu can also bet that the insurance companies will be scrutinizing those satellite and aerial photos, comparing them with damage claims subsequently reported.

If Allstate simply agreed to cover all water damage regardless of whether a flood policy was in place, lots of people will be suing for the return of flood policy premiums, and rightfully so.

152 posted on 09/21/2005 12:12:28 PM PDT by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte; Hap
This is BS. Homeowners policies do not cover flood. That's what flood insurance is for.
153 posted on 09/21/2005 12:50:04 PM PDT by Bacon Man (When I think of all the ways I've abused myself over the years I think, wait, what was the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george76

The Weather Channel has constant reminders that flood insurance is required. Anyone in a coastal area or flood zone that doesn't have it is just asking for trouble. I can't believe mortgages are written without flood insurance.


154 posted on 09/21/2005 12:52:47 PM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

"If Allstate simply agreed to cover all water damage regardless of whether a flood policy was in place, lots of people will be suing for the return of flood policy premiums, and rightfully so."

Let's see...nearly thirty years worth of premiums. Woo hoo! Count me in!

I can see the argument too, but it just doesn't work that way. Pretty much all the water on earth, at one point or another, came from above. Flooding caused by heavy rains, one could argue, came from above and so should be covered. It isn't. A flood caused by a tree that gets blown over onto a dam was caused by wind and should be covered, right? It isn't.


155 posted on 09/21/2005 12:54:22 PM PDT by Texasbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

Interesting stuff. All I really know is I'm glad all I have to worry about is snow.


156 posted on 09/21/2005 1:02:02 PM PDT by colorado tanker (The People Have Spoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Euphemy
That's New Orleans that's below sea level, not Mississippi.

Same difference... if you live in a flood plain you've got to plan accordingly.

You WILL eventually die... if that would be a financial burden, then you need life insurance. You will very likely need medical care over the course of your life (and lots of it). If you don't think you'll always have the savings to cover it... you need health insurance. You will sooner or later get involved in a car accident... you need car insurance if you don't have an adequate reserve.

And if you live somewhere that you KNOW will eventually flood (even if it's only once every 100 years), then you need flood insurance unless you can afford to lose your home.

157 posted on 09/21/2005 1:03:16 PM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: All
This is the standard language (maybe not exactly the same in your policy);

Section 1. - LOSSES NOT INSURED

2 c. Water Damage, meaning
(1) flood, surface water, waves , tidal water, tsunami, seiche, overflow of a body of water, or spray from any of these, all whether driven by wind or not;

Also, ANYONE, anywhere can buy flood insurance through NFIP.

Trust me.
158 posted on 09/21/2005 1:04:12 PM PDT by bigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: All
Interestingly enough, it takes something like a month for flood insurance to become effective (so you can't call right now from TX and rip them off).

I'd bet there will be stories in a couple weeks of the people in TX who saw Katrina and realized "I need flood insurance!", so they purchased some... but haven't had 30 days for it to become effective.

159 posted on 09/21/2005 1:06:09 PM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Is this

Your former Allstate agent?

160 posted on 09/21/2005 1:16:04 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-189 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson