Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: colorado tanker
I'm not so sure this is as cut and dried as most think. NO flooding due to a levee break is a true flood IMHO. But what about buildings that aren't in a flood plain but were hit by the extraordinary storm surge? Isn't the surge a result of the high winds? I'm not picking sides, but I see the argument.

The water that poured through the levee breaches was driven into Lake Pontchartrain by the wind, too. The conventional wisdom is that "water that comes from the ground level up" is flood damage, no matter how it got there. Water that enters a structure from above, through wind-damaged walls or roof, is covered by the standard (non-flood) homeowners or commercial property policy.

You can bet that people who didn't have flood coverage have been busy inflicting post-Katrina roof damage before the adjusters view the property. Yu can also bet that the insurance companies will be scrutinizing those satellite and aerial photos, comparing them with damage claims subsequently reported.

If Allstate simply agreed to cover all water damage regardless of whether a flood policy was in place, lots of people will be suing for the return of flood policy premiums, and rightfully so.

152 posted on 09/21/2005 12:12:28 PM PDT by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: Charles Martel

"If Allstate simply agreed to cover all water damage regardless of whether a flood policy was in place, lots of people will be suing for the return of flood policy premiums, and rightfully so."

Let's see...nearly thirty years worth of premiums. Woo hoo! Count me in!

I can see the argument too, but it just doesn't work that way. Pretty much all the water on earth, at one point or another, came from above. Flooding caused by heavy rains, one could argue, came from above and so should be covered. It isn't. A flood caused by a tree that gets blown over onto a dam was caused by wind and should be covered, right? It isn't.


155 posted on 09/21/2005 12:54:22 PM PDT by Texasbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: Charles Martel

Interesting stuff. All I really know is I'm glad all I have to worry about is snow.


156 posted on 09/21/2005 1:02:02 PM PDT by colorado tanker (The People Have Spoken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

To: All
This is the standard language (maybe not exactly the same in your policy);

Section 1. - LOSSES NOT INSURED

2 c. Water Damage, meaning
(1) flood, surface water, waves , tidal water, tsunami, seiche, overflow of a body of water, or spray from any of these, all whether driven by wind or not;

Also, ANYONE, anywhere can buy flood insurance through NFIP.

Trust me.
158 posted on 09/21/2005 1:04:12 PM PDT by bigdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson