Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld Ordered Shaffer and Philpott Not to Testify
QT Monster's Place ^ | 9/20/2005 | vadkins

Posted on 09/20/2005 8:09:20 PM PDT by vadkins

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

1 posted on 09/20/2005 8:09:23 PM PDT by vadkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vadkins

so whats the skinny?


2 posted on 09/20/2005 8:12:03 PM PDT by notigar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notigar

able danger just got gagged.


3 posted on 09/20/2005 8:15:15 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Campus Shocker! My son's political science prof is a Republican!...developing....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vadkins
AS: What I will tell you is I was told by 2 DoD officials today directly that it is their understanding that the Secretary of Defense directed that we not testify tomorrow. That is my understanding.

How is this a direct order ?
4 posted on 09/20/2005 8:15:54 PM PDT by stylin19a (In golf, some are long, I'm "Lama Long")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: notigar

Yeah .. why would Rumsfeld do that ..??


5 posted on 09/20/2005 8:16:00 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America has the greatest military on the face of the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vadkins
My guest Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, scheduled to testify tomorrow before the Senate Judiciary Committee. They're trying to shut him up folks.

Count me out as a tinfoiler.

I think they're really concerned about security; they want to keep sensitive technology secret.

I really don't think they trying to cover up embarrassing information.

6 posted on 09/20/2005 8:16:53 PM PDT by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vadkins

No surprise here. The Bush administration doesn't want to say or do anything that would embarass Bill Clinton and company. How despicable.


7 posted on 09/20/2005 8:17:46 PM PDT by taxesareforever (Government is running amuck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

From the tone of Lt. Col. Shaffer on the radio tonight, it sounded like he very much considered it an order not to testify tomorrow.


8 posted on 09/20/2005 8:18:16 PM PDT by vadkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

Hmmmm?? That's my thoughts too .. about national security.

However, why didn't Rumsfeld talk with Weldon beforehand and work this out instead of waiting until the day before the hearing - that part I don't understand.


9 posted on 09/20/2005 8:19:23 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America has the greatest military on the face of the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

I agree. This story has had me rattled from the beginning. If security is the concern with this, then Rep. Weldon would not have spoken publicly about this would he? If he did know and he spoke publicly anyway, isn't that unAmerican? So much of this is hard to fathom.

But I keep going back to the fact that the identity of the hijackers were known so soon after the 9-11 attacks.


10 posted on 09/20/2005 8:22:21 PM PDT by vadkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: vadkins

Well .. it's going to look like the Bush admin is hanging Weldon out to dry .. and I don't think they're doing that.

And .. it's also going to look like Bush is protecting Clinton(s) because of their supposed new buddy status - and I don't believe that either.


11 posted on 09/20/2005 8:22:21 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America has the greatest military on the face of the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

Rush Limbaugh reported on his radio show a few weeks ago that he'd interviewed Weldon for his newsletter. Rush said that he'd never had an interview like it. That Weldon was absolutely furious over the entire Able Danger affair.


12 posted on 09/20/2005 8:24:11 PM PDT by vadkins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: vadkins

Well .. the hijackers didn't hide their identity on 9/11 - which made them easy to trace since we already had been watching these guys .. but evidently we weren't watching them close enough.

And .. with Gorelick calling Weldon's office and saying, "I didn't do anything wrong", when Weldon had not accused her of doing anything wrong .. well .. that has me rattled.


13 posted on 09/20/2005 8:29:00 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America has the greatest military on the face of the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vadkins

It's supposed to be in October's Letter. This month's interview was Rudy.


14 posted on 09/20/2005 8:30:04 PM PDT by CyberAnt (America has the greatest military on the face of the earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: notigar
Apparently this is a CYA move by the "Ruling Class", I expect some type of "crimnal investigation" to be launched...but against the "whistle blowers"...the Gorelicks and the other insiders will be protected by the Inside the Beltway Gang...

A new set of hearings, hell, maybe even a "911 Commission Two" with more cicuitious B.S than the Warren Commission...all to lead exactly NOWHERE... aided by the compliant lackeys in the media...

This is a scandal far worse than perjury regarding sexual escapades with White House interns or a third rate political burglary etc. etc. etc....

Nothing to see people... now move on...

15 posted on 09/20/2005 8:31:33 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vadkins

WTF!

Of all the stories touted about by the fringe tin-foilers, this Able Danger story has me concerned.

What the **** is going on?


16 posted on 09/20/2005 8:31:51 PM PDT by msf92497 (Bored as hell...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

It's a Bush/Rovian bluff! Make the media go all in- "What are they hiding?" Then they slowly let the info slip and the MSM hangs Clinton & Clinton. That's my story and I'm sticking to it!


17 posted on 09/20/2005 8:32:06 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vadkins

Just a thought: COuld ABle Danger have been destroyed because it was replaced by a newer, better, system and the DOD doesn't want anyone to know what they have now?


18 posted on 09/20/2005 8:32:30 PM PDT by hoosiermama ( Blanco, Landrieu, Nagin & Witt.. good name for a flood control business...Motto:"We got dikes!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

Mebbe.

At any rate, it's early days on this. If it really DOES look like the good-ol'-spooks club is hiding something, THEN let's raise some sand.


19 posted on 09/20/2005 8:36:37 PM PDT by decal ("The Republic was not established by cowards, and cowards will not preserve it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vadkins



Must be something about National Security and putting people as well as information gathering at risk.


20 posted on 09/20/2005 8:37:47 PM PDT by msnimje (Cogito Ergo Sum Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson