Skip to comments.
Specter will back Roberts for court
The Washington Times ^
| 21 September 2005
| Charles Hurt
Posted on 09/20/2005 6:38:25 PM PDT by Aussie Dasher
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Who has the smelling salts?
To: Aussie Dasher
does any one have a preliminary head count?
2
posted on
09/20/2005 6:39:19 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
To: Aussie Dasher
I'll believe it after the votes are cast.
3
posted on
09/20/2005 6:39:34 PM PDT
by
wagglebee
("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
To: Aussie Dasher
He'd be a damn fool not to...
4
posted on
09/20/2005 6:39:57 PM PDT
by
Keith in Iowa
(Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?)
To: Aussie Dasher
Roberts really has these guys snowed.
5
posted on
09/20/2005 6:40:34 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Aussie Dasher
6
posted on
09/20/2005 6:40:39 PM PDT
by
Past Your Eyes
(I'm just sitting here on the Group W bench.)
To: Aussie Dasher
Mr. Specter was quoted as saying he believed that Judge Roberts was very competent in the intricacies of Scottish Law, and that he was therefore qualified to serve on the Supreme Court.
7
posted on
09/20/2005 6:42:09 PM PDT
by
RWR8189
( Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: Aussie Dasher
8
posted on
09/20/2005 6:43:24 PM PDT
by
since1868
To: Aussie Dasher
Arlen stuck his finger in his nose to see which way his breath was blowing and it came out "go, you're safe"
Leni
9
posted on
09/20/2005 6:44:00 PM PDT
by
MinuteGal
To: Aussie Dasher
"Who has the smelling salts?"
What smelling salts? Kennedy is in need of restoratives, 86 proof and higher.
10
posted on
09/20/2005 6:53:29 PM PDT
by
GSlob
To: Aussie Dasher
Although Mr. Specter is the panel's top Republican, his support for the conservative jurist was not a foregone conclusion Specter is not a Republican and the only forgone conclusion is that he probably won't support the President's next choice which is the more crucial one. Specter will lean towards not upsetting the "balance" of the court which of course is pathetically unbalanced if you actually consider the Constitution as a guide. Specter will not IMO support a true Constitutionalist as the next choice.
11
posted on
09/20/2005 6:54:51 PM PDT
by
Archon of the East
("universal executive power of the law of nature")
To: Aussie Dasher
I sincerely hope that Senator Nelson of Florida votes nay.
It would help us here immensely in 06, but I predict that old Ben knows this, and that he will vote for confirmation.
12
posted on
09/20/2005 6:55:41 PM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
To: Aussie Dasher

Oh Arlen, Isn't that just special of you ..."
13
posted on
09/20/2005 6:56:31 PM PDT
by
Babu
To: Perdogg
14
posted on
09/20/2005 6:57:16 PM PDT
by
deport
To: deport
Bacus(D-MT) = Yea
Nelson (D-NE) = Yea
15
posted on
09/20/2005 6:59:50 PM PDT
by
Perdogg
To: wagglebee
>>
I'll believe it after the votes are cast. <<
He'll vote for Roberts. It's a conservative replacing a conservative so the court status quo is maintained and Specter's precious Roe v. Wade stays intact no matter how Robert votes.
Once Bush selects a pro-life nominee to replace pro-choice O'CONNOR, however, Specter will gear up for BORKIN' TIME!
The back-stabbing RINO is all too predictable.
16
posted on
09/20/2005 6:59:55 PM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(Find out the TRUTH about the Chicago Democrat Machine's "Best Friend" in the GOP : www.nolahood.com)
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Aussie Dasher
The Pennsylvanian often bucks his party and famously opposed the 1987 nomination of Judge Robert H. Bork...As often is the case with RINOS.
18
posted on
09/20/2005 7:02:00 PM PDT
by
luvbach1
(Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: MinuteGal
Arlen stuck his finger in his nose to see which way his breath was blowing and it came out "go, you're safe"Yeah, I'd say that's about right. Man, a freaking Republican feels he has to announce to the world that he's actually voting for a nominee from his own party! Unbelievable!
20
posted on
09/20/2005 7:13:06 PM PDT
by
Obadiah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson