Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Port of New Orleans and WHY We Must Rebuild!
Various ^ | 9/15/05 | Various

Posted on 09/15/2005 7:44:41 PM PDT by Calpernia

Located at the mouth of Mississippi River, the Port of New Orleans is America’s gateway to the global market. New Orleans has been a center for international trade since 1718.

Today, the Port of New Orleans is at the center of the world’s busiest port complex — Louisiana’s Lower Mississippi River. Its proximity to the American Midwest via a 14,500-mile inland waterway system makes New Orleans the port of choice for the movement of cargoes such as steel, grain, containers and manufactured goods.

The Port of New Orleans is the only deepwater port in the United States served by six class one railroads. This gives port users direct and economical rail service to or from anywhere in the country.

New Orleans is one of America’s leading general cargo ports. A productive and efficient private maritime industry has help produce impressive results, including the USA’s top market share for import steel, natural rubber, plywood and coffee.

In the last 10 years, the Port of New Orleans has invested more than $400 million in new state-of-the-art facilities. Improved breakbulk and container terminals feature new multipurpose cranes, expanded marshalling yards and a new roadway to handle truck traffic.

Maritime activity within the Port of New Orleans is responsible for more than 107,000 jobs, $2 billion in earnings, $13 billion in spending and $231 million in taxes statewide.

The Port of New Orleans has also been a defined area where foreign merchandise gets brought into the country without being immediately subject to the usual U.S. Customs regulations!!!


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: border; economy; export; import; katrina; neworleans; rebuildingno; trade; useyourowncash; whyrebuild
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-243 next last
To: Calpernia
" $2 billion in earnings, $13 billion in spending "

There's the problem.

61 posted on 09/15/2005 8:54:31 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

LOL...most certainly. I was being flippant.

I don't think we should write off California.

Well..maybe San Francisco. And we could probably let Berkeley go. LA really isn't doing much for us, so we could wave them goodbye.

Actually, all of Marin county would be better wet.

Oh heck. Let's set some nuclear charges along the San Andreas fault.


62 posted on 09/15/2005 8:58:06 PM PDT by rlmorel ("Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does." Whittaker Chambers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dts32041

Not a new occurance. And not isolated to New Orleans.

There are modern day slave trades going on.

New Orleans had a nasty sex tourism industry called G&F Tours.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/1472612/posts

There are also networks in New Orleans and throughout the US that are bringing in immigrants, holding the hostage to work in nasty conditions, with the threat of punishment.

Keep an eye on ice.gov for almost daily updates on the immigration rings they are running down.

http://www.ice.gov/graphics/news/newsreleases/index.htm


63 posted on 09/15/2005 8:58:16 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

hmmmm, Baja CA too....

Oh now you got me thinking!


64 posted on 09/15/2005 9:02:20 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
You can't make assumptions about who did what and for what reason.

That isn't an assumption. They(or at least some of them) stated that the bill did not have enough oversight and such so they couldn't vote for it.

Barton
Flake
Foxx
Garrett
Hostettler
King
Otter
Paul
Sensenbrenner
Tancredo
Westmoreland

Garrett
WASHINGTON -- New Jersey Rep. Scott Garrett said Thursday he voted against sending $51.8 billion in emergency relief to the areas affected by Hurricane Katrina because the bill contained no accountability measures.

"I wanted to make sure that the people in the affected areas get every bit of assistance they absolutely need," Garrett said in a telephone interview from his office here. "We do that by making sure there's accountability through FEMA (the Federal Emergency Management Agency)."

"Writing them a blank check and not being able to have oversight does not achieve that," said Garrett, R-Wantage.
newsday

Tancredo

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., said in a statement that he voted against the bill because it failed to include controls on how the money will be spent. He proposed creating a bipartisan oversight committee.

”It is our duty to get relief to persons affected by Hurricane Katrina. But it is political malpractice to spend taxpayers’ money without making sure that the aid is getting to the right people,” Tancredo said.
here

Westmoreland
"Georgia Congressman Lynn Westmoreland (R-GA 8th) Friday defended his vote against the U.S. federal government's $51.8 billion hurricane aid package .... 'I certainly don't want to keep any money away from the relief effort,' Westmoreland said, speaking from the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. But he said Congress approved the extra money without imposing any fiscal controls, which would help guarantee that the federal aid reaches the survivors of Hurricane Katrina. 'I don't think it's right to give the taxpayers money without some accountability,' Westmoreland said."
here

65 posted on 09/15/2005 9:09:56 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

I was on that thread. I stand by what I posted.


66 posted on 09/15/2005 9:13:47 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Hostettler's office did not issue a statement following the vote, but others who voted in opposition said the aid should be balanced with spending cuts elsewhere or that the funding came with too little oversight.

here

67 posted on 09/15/2005 9:16:03 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Rebuild the port. Just don't rebuild the centers of debauchery and sexual depravity like Bourbon Street and the place where they have the so called "Southern Decadence party."


68 posted on 09/15/2005 9:19:42 PM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

And is Hostettler privy to the details of the investigations of the politicians?

Is he privy to knowledge as to whether these will be the same players in place politics wise?



Echo, you have gone from welfare housing to quoting politicians.

The ports need to be rebuilt. The town has to be made inhabitable.

The players that made the mess are not going to be blindly handed the dollars.


69 posted on 09/15/2005 9:25:49 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
inhabitable = habitable
70 posted on 09/15/2005 9:26:38 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
I agree the ports need to be rebuilt! The bill that was passed needed more oversight.
71 posted on 09/15/2005 9:29:51 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

I think we are in agreement. I do believe my meaning of blindly handing money and your point of more oversight mean the same thing.

I don't think anyone can go and destroy a major infrastructure and not have a microscope...hmmm...implemented in a highly sensitive orifice. ;)


72 posted on 09/15/2005 9:37:40 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Joe Cannon
It's alittle hard to see a light at the end of the tunnel,when the give aways kept on giving and nothing is changing except a larger cash amount.
73 posted on 09/15/2005 9:38:05 PM PDT by patriciamary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

A BIG if,If they work and if they pay taxes.Old habits die hard.


74 posted on 09/15/2005 9:40:37 PM PDT by patriciamary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

I wrote Kalifornia off eight years ago.


75 posted on 09/15/2005 9:46:50 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: patriciamary

There were a million and a half people in the Greater New Orleans area, the majority of those people were hard working tax paying people. Don't believe all the hype you have seen on tv. That is not the whole story. Do you honestly think that the whole city was nothing but a ghetto? It wasn't. Your ignorance is really tiresome.


76 posted on 09/15/2005 9:48:56 PM PDT by CajunConservative ("Dem's can bus people to the polls but can't bus them out of danger to save their lives.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: inquest

Good point. I say build it wide and deep and full of gators.


77 posted on 09/15/2005 9:54:23 PM PDT by M1911A1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Who's 'we' kimosabe?

L

78 posted on 09/15/2005 9:55:21 PM PDT by Lurker (Reality cannot be changed by wishful thinking, good intentions, or legislation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Did your money NOT go to New Orleans before?

Do you not benefit from US commerce?

Is New Orleans NOT a border?

Is New Orleans NOT a major US infrastructure?


79 posted on 09/15/2005 10:01:03 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Earthquakes are a possibility, predictions of one at best a probability.

New River is a certainty. Man proposes, nature disposes.
80 posted on 09/15/2005 10:05:16 PM PDT by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-243 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson