Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: COEXERJ145
What about a law to protect people with blue eyes, people who are short, people who walk with a limp, people with acne, etc. etc. etc. These people are nuts. A crime against a person is a crime.
2 posted on
09/14/2005 4:29:52 PM PDT by
mlc9852
To: COEXERJ145
Hate crimes??? Isn't EVERY crime a hate crime, I am soooooo sick of every minority having their own set of rules.
3 posted on
09/14/2005 4:30:51 PM PDT by
rockabyebaby
(I'm not afraid to say out loud what the rest of you are afraid to admit.)
To: COEXERJ145
backers were jubilant LOL
4 posted on
09/14/2005 4:31:17 PM PDT by
DBeers
(†)
To: COEXERJ145
The hate crimes amendment would expand existing federal hate crime program to add sexual orientation, gender, gender identity and disability to federal hate crime laws. It would give grants to the states to help prosecute such crimes. I had better get this off my chest now.
Against nature, queer, fag, abomination!
8 posted on
09/14/2005 4:33:24 PM PDT by
rocksblues
(I support the war on terror)
To: COEXERJ145
I don't think Bush will sign anything like that.
10 posted on
09/14/2005 4:34:22 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: COEXERJ145
When do they start jailing my pastors for reading from the Bible?
14 posted on
09/14/2005 4:36:33 PM PDT by
keats5
To: COEXERJ145
Homosexuality is a fetish, not a lifestyle.
To: COEXERJ145
Here's a dumb question: what provision of the Constitution authorizes Congress to pass this kind of legislation?
21 posted on
09/14/2005 4:44:42 PM PDT by
kesg
To: COEXERJ145
Whew reuters gets all excited about a tiny amendment to push a bill through, while that amendment will probably be taken out if it ever makes it to a conference committee.
<p.
JMO, it shows reuters immense liberal agenda, but of course some on FR will automatically scream "conservative betrayal" and become candidates for the San Francisco drama queen contest, while all in the while can't see they are being played like a fiddle by reuters.
25 posted on
09/14/2005 4:46:53 PM PDT by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: COEXERJ145
![Image Hosted by ImageShack.us](http://img66.imageshack.us/img66/6351/gayalarm1hg.jpg)
So posting the above picture could soon be a federal "hate crime"?
Oh, give me a break...
29 posted on
09/14/2005 4:51:46 PM PDT by
vox_freedom
(Fear no evil)
To: COEXERJ145; All
Below is the roll call vote.
Link
31 posted on
09/14/2005 4:53:56 PM PDT by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: COEXERJ145
Boy, I sure am glad we elected a Republican House to prevent such stupid bills from being passed. /s
32 posted on
09/14/2005 4:54:23 PM PDT by
Reagan is King
(Those who say it cannot be done should not interrupt the people doing it)
To: COEXERJ145
Oh crap. It's already a crime. This target specific hate crime stuff has GOT to stop. I can't believe our Republicans are pandering like this.
34 posted on
09/14/2005 4:56:23 PM PDT by
Peach
(South Carolina is praying for our Gulf coast citizens.)
To: COEXERJ145
"U.S. House backs...."
Careful now, with some gays it's hard to tell if that's a hate crime or a sex act.
37 posted on
09/14/2005 4:59:18 PM PDT by
trubluolyguy
(Hey barkeep, who's leg do ya have to hump to get a dry martini around here?)
To: EdReform; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; stage left; Yakboy; I_Love_My_Husband; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping.
This is BAD, BAD, BAD. Very, very bad. I am disgusted. The House has stood up to this vileness for some time even though the good ol' boys in the Senate kept shoving it at them.
Now the principle-less so-called Republicans have surrendered without a shot being fired. I am steamed, angered, sickened, repulsed, and we need to email, write, call President Bush. He has to veto this. Has to.
Freepmail me AND DirtyHarryY2K if you want on/off this pinglist.
Note this abomination:
"add sexual orientation, gender, gender identity"
GENDER IDENTITY! Words cannot express how disgusted I am that so-called Republicans voted for this nastiness. If President Bush signs this, a very, very important line has been crossed.
40 posted on
09/14/2005 5:01:48 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: COEXERJ145
I want names. I want names.
41 posted on
09/14/2005 5:02:25 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(A vitiated state of morals, a corrupted public conscience, are incompatible with freedom. P. Henry)
To: COEXERJ145
47 posted on
09/14/2005 5:06:48 PM PDT by
Michael Goldsberry
(an enemy of islam -- Joe Boucher; Leapfrog; Dr.Zoidberg; Lazamataz; ...)
To: COEXERJ145; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; RandallFlagg; ...
To: COEXERJ145
A VOICE VOTE!!!!!! THIS PASSED ON A VOICE VOTE?!?!? WHO IN THE HE!! WAS THE REPUB. ON THE FLOOR THAT DIDN'T ASK FOR A ROLL CALL VOTE!!??!1:25 P.M. - On agreeing to the Conyers amendment Agreed to by voice vote.
1:24 P.M. - DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with debate on the Conyers amendment under the five-minute rule.
Amendment offered by Mr. Conyers.
An amendment numbered 23 printed in the Congressional Record to add a new section which privides for inclusion of gender statistics under the Hate Crime Statistics Act.
To: COEXERJ145
So glad I voted republican.
Huurrll!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson