Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COEXERJ145

What about a law to protect people with blue eyes, people who are short, people who walk with a limp, people with acne, etc. etc. etc. These people are nuts. A crime against a person is a crime.


2 posted on 09/14/2005 4:29:52 PM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mlc9852

you dont choose to have blue eyes, i dont think they should be protected either though.


7 posted on 09/14/2005 4:33:10 PM PDT by HHKrepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
What about a law to protect people with blue eyes, people who are short, people who walk with a limp

I can get behind that particularly since I fit the description, although the limp is due to a bruise on my heel and is temporary...but I would retain my special privileges after it heals, right. I mean I limped for a while. Is there money in this for me. Can I sue?

60 posted on 09/14/2005 5:17:32 PM PDT by Bahbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

Yeah, and what about polygamists, prostitutes, bigamists, flashers, pornographers, swingers, intergenerationalers, strippers, druggies, alcoholics, liars, cheaters, and all other lifestyle choices? What makes gays more special than other lifestyle choices?


152 posted on 09/14/2005 8:04:15 PM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (The repenting soul is the victorious soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

I think there ought be protection for short middleaged blonde, blue eyed females!


212 posted on 09/15/2005 5:20:24 AM PDT by tutstar (OurFlorida.true.ws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

Now it will be a crime to even THINK "homo" or "queer".


235 posted on 09/15/2005 8:23:52 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

Crimes should be defined by clear facts, as ACTIONS that violate the rights of another person, regardless of what that person's race/gender/nationality/ethnicity/sexual practices may be. When we start making crimes against some but not others "hate crimes" by trying to peer inside someone's brain to determine whether they are said to 'hate' a certain category of people, we have simply expanded the leftist conception of "thought crime"..... Think of the converse: let's say person X commits the same violent act against someone who happens to be a "caucasian heterosexual male".... somehow that's a lesser crime because it doesn't include the thought component of 'hate' for gays, etc.??????? Anyway, until the PC-police start including black-on-white "hate crimes" in their litany it will continue to be obvious that they operate with a highly selective and distorted conception of 'hate'.....


253 posted on 09/15/2005 11:09:15 AM PDT by Enchante (Don't put up with Michael Moore-on's slanders anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

This is not all it does

U.S. HOUSE BANS GUN POSSESSION BY SEX OFFENDERS (VPC EMAIL)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1484802/posts


271 posted on 09/15/2005 12:56:49 PM PDT by quietolong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852
A crime against a person is a crime.

Not at all. The motive behind any crime is as important as the crime itself. It helps us figure out if it was accidental or malicious, lets us find an appropriate way of punishing (and possibly rehabilitating) the offender, among other things.

Classifying hate crimes are done so because the minorities that *typically* (not all the time) are the victims, are *typically* (again, not all the time) targeted more than the "people with blue eyes, people who are short, people who walk with a limp, people with acne, etc. etc. etc." because they are perceived to be different in a way that often scares the offender.

310 posted on 09/16/2005 7:20:08 AM PDT by costsvcrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: mlc9852

No, a minority cannot commit a hate crime, because only white people hate. (sarcasm on/off). Unbelieveable, but true. that case of the asian shooter killing 5 white men on their private property because they were white is Not a hate crime.


363 posted on 09/18/2005 10:26:59 PM PDT by television is just wrong (http://hehttp://print.google.com/print/doc?articleidisblogs.blogspot.com/ (visit blogs, visit ads).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson