To: COEXERJ145
Whew reuters gets all excited about a tiny amendment to push a bill through, while that amendment will probably be taken out if it ever makes it to a conference committee.
<p.
JMO, it shows reuters immense liberal agenda, but of course some on FR will automatically scream "conservative betrayal" and become candidates for the San Francisco drama queen contest, while all in the while can't see they are being played like a fiddle by reuters.
25 posted on
09/14/2005 4:46:53 PM PDT by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: Dane
"But of course some on FR will automatically scream "conservative betrayal"
Aren't you an OB person too? (Open Borders)
What exactly do you agree with that is considered conservative or american? Not knocking you personally, I really am curious.
45 posted on
09/14/2005 5:05:40 PM PDT by
trubluolyguy
(Hey barkeep, who's leg do ya have to hump to get a dry martini around here?)
To: Dane
"JMO, it shows reuters immense liberal agenda, but of course some on FR will automatically scream "conservative betrayal" and become candidates for the San Francisco drama queen contest, while all in the while can't see they are being played like a fiddle by reuters."
JMO?? kinda redundant we know it is you posting or is it??
as for skeptic view of congress and sadly MR BUSH..I guess we have no reason to think that our RINO's in office will stop this?? Sick of the wimps we got in congress and the
out of touch white house..oh I know Roberts is really just toying with the Dems he is a strict constructionist..gotta bridge to sell ya too. oh its you Dane well forget all above.
227 posted on
09/15/2005 6:52:02 AM PDT by
ConsentofGoverned
(A sucker is born every minute..what are the voters?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson