Skip to comments.
Federal Judge Declares Pledge Of Allegiance Unconstitutional
Click2Houston.com ^
| 1:07 pm CDT September 14, 2005
| AP
Posted on 09/14/2005 1:26:12 PM PDT by FreedomCalls
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: The Noodle
Well now, I read today's decision, and apparently the Supreme Court "reversed," rather than "vacated," the prior Newdow case. However, the district court's reasoning that the 9th Circuit decision is still binding because it was "reversed" on the grounds of "prudential standing" is, IMHO, nonsense. Of course it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things because this case will go to the 9th Circuit regardless of what the district court judge decided.
To: upier
UnF'n Believable You're not really surprised, are you?
ML/NJ
22
posted on
09/14/2005 3:05:29 PM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: FreedomCalls
What is happening to my country?
I'm really getting scared.
GOD bless the USA!
To: FreedomCalls
Last time this happened, Congress was fuming mad. Where's the outrage now? Oops, don't want to get Roberts in there too easy.
24
posted on
09/14/2005 3:07:21 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
To: FreedomCalls
Perhaps it's time for us to take back our children from the control of the state.
This will come to SCOTUS. That is certain.
I suggest FReepers start doing their homework. Some seem to feel that this ruling will be shot down by the Supreme Court, but I, for one, cannot be comfortable with such "feelings," considering the destruction activist courts have wrought on this country.
Try reading WISCONSIN v. YODER ET AL. for starters.
1972 SCOTUS ruling on compulsory education for Amish children.
25
posted on
09/14/2005 3:09:15 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: DustyMoment
Here ya go.....
26
posted on
09/14/2005 3:09:24 PM PDT
by
Chinito
(6990th Security Group, RC-135/Combat Apple, Class of '68)
To: The Noodle
It's not nonsense. As far as the 9th circuit goes, the original ruling is still in effect until it is overruled by a higher court.
27
posted on
09/14/2005 3:46:25 PM PDT
by
jess35
To: sageb1
Perhaps it's time for us to take back our children from the control of the state. The real question is, why in the hell would any responsible parent EVER put their child in the control of the state?
28
posted on
09/14/2005 3:48:38 PM PDT
by
jess35
To: DoraC
It was tossed on procedural grounds, but the reasoning still stands, and lower courts are still bound by it.No the reasoning does not still stand. The case was tossed. It is not a precedent for anything. Period.
To: jess35
he original ruling is still in effect until it is overruled by a higher courtIt was tossed.
To: FreedomCalls
The tyranny of the minority.
31
posted on
09/14/2005 3:55:32 PM PDT
by
combat_boots
(Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
To: jess35
The entire Fran-freako Circus is nothing but nonsense. It should be abolished, or at least constrained in its jurisdiction to a few small deep-blue states (California and various Pacific territories, possibly with Hawai'i).
32
posted on
09/14/2005 3:55:43 PM PDT
by
dufekin
(US Senate: the only place where the majority [D] comprises fewer than the minority [R])
To: Chinito
Thanks. I had it somewhere, I just couldn't find it and it seemed particularly appropriate.
33
posted on
09/14/2005 4:27:46 PM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: FreedomCalls
U.S. District Judge Lawrence Karlton ruled that the pledge's reference to one nation "under God" violates school children's right to be "free from a coercive requirement to affirm God."I wonder where this right that school children have to be "free from a coercive requirement to affirm God" is derived from. It's certainly not stated in the U.S. Constitution.
To: SF Republican
easy there, it is just where the court is located, we had nothing to do with the decision. Don't worry, buddy. You'll get a 72 hour evacuation warning. :-)
To: The Noodle; DoraC
Thanx for the explanation....
36
posted on
09/14/2005 4:54:06 PM PDT
by
stylin19a
(In golf, some are long, I'm "Lama Long")
To: FreedomCalls
Ninth circus losers, take note from our friend Sam Adams -
" If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands that which feed you. May your chain be set lightly upon you and posterity forget ye were our countrymen."
Maybe the Ninth circus court should be the target of a "special commission" set up to investigate them, so that they may be disbarred, and America can reject these seditionists.
Maybe Red Skelton could clue them up
here.
To: AndyJackson
38
posted on
09/14/2005 5:00:14 PM PDT
by
jess35
To: Calif4Bush
The reason it's happening is because true patriots in office - afraid of public opinion - are afraid to confront the secular left with the truth: America is a nation conceived under God, the Judeo-Christain God, like it or leave it, and we believe in the supreme greatness of this God to guide our country to glory and defeat our enemies. Until we can stand up openly for such principles, the enemies of the state will continue to get their way, ignited by the the sedition ring leader in the supreme court, godd old Ruth Bater, who is also a traitor to her religion.
To: FreedomCalls
SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge in San Francisco ruled Wednesday it is unconstitutional for public school children to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Meanwhile in 49 other states that are not terminally struck by liberalism and idiocy, the pledge recitations continue.
40
posted on
09/14/2005 5:02:52 PM PDT
by
Centurion2000
(An elected Legislature can trample a man's rights as easy as a King can.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson