Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FLIGHT 93 MEMORIAL Please respond!
9.14.05 | snowrip

Posted on 09/14/2005 9:38:00 AM PDT by snowrip

As many of you have already heard, the National park Service is nearing a final decision regarding a memorial to the passengers of Flight 93. The aircraft would have hit the capitol on 9/11 were it not for the heroism of the passengers, who fought back against their Islamic hijackers. The memorial will be built in the field in Pennsylvania where the plane crashed.

Unfortunately, the design which is under final review is far from a memorial to the victims. The winning design, chosen from over a thousand entries, is called “The Crescent of Embrace”. It is a just that... a red crescent. It features a crescent-shaped grove of red maple trees which ring the crash site. Unfortunately for those who perished aboard Flight 93, the crescent is the internationally-recognized symbol of religious life for Islam around the globe. Architect Paul Murdoch, the winner of the design contest, has emphasized to the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette that his creation was about "healing" and "contemplation." As a "...gesture of healing and bonding...", he has proposed hanging wind chimes in a tall tower built at the crash site.

As any rational human being can easily deduct, this memorial will be an utter insult to those who were murdered by Islamic terrorists on September 11th. Through an apologistic, hand-wringing, liberal "embrace" of that day (and this war), the idea of this memorial has been corrupted to the point where it has become the literal embrace of Islamic savagery by the "multicultural" left.

There have been some great articles written on this topic... you can see them at http://www.nationalledger.com/artman/publish/article_2726705.shtml http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1484237/posts

I have posted this request to ask for your help. If this memorial is approved and built, it will stand as an affront to those who gave their lives so unselfishly that day. Write, email, fax, or call the National Park Service. Ask your friends and family to do the same. Let them know, in no uncertain terms, where you stand!

The design must first be approved by the Superintendent of the Flight 93 National Memorial. Contact info is: National Park Service, 109 West Main Street, Suite 104, Somerset, PA 15501-2035. You can voice your comments by e-mail at FLNI_Superintendent@nps.gov or by telephone at (814) 443-4557. Fax is (814) 443-2180. However, the final decision regarding the design of the Flight 93 Memorial must be ultimately approved by The Secretary of the Department of the Interior, Ms. Gale A. Norton. Messages can be sent to her via e-mail at: gale_norton@ios.doi.gov or use the site’s Internet contact page. Her telephone number is (202) 208-3100.

(Thanks to milford421 for most of the contact info!)

We are many voices. Together, we can try and stop this.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; US: Pennsylvania; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 911memorial; flight93; flight93memorial; nationalparkservice; redcrescent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: snowrip

E-mail sent to both. Phone call to follow.


41 posted on 09/14/2005 10:49:12 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

Anyone been checking out the DUmmies to see their take on this outrage?


42 posted on 09/14/2005 10:50:11 AM PDT by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
"Actually, they found that all data seemed to correspond to the memorial being aligned toward Mecca."

I think they also said that because Mecca can be faced in two opposite directions, there’s a 1 in 9 chance that any eclipse will face Mecca. Personally, I don’t buy it, but it’s not my money.

43 posted on 09/14/2005 10:52:22 AM PDT by elfman2 (2 tacos short of a combination plate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

Not yet... but I will!


44 posted on 09/14/2005 11:01:40 AM PDT by snowrip (Liberal? YOU HAVE NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT. Actually, you lack even a legitimate excuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
Anyone who is interested, I recommend you follow this link to:

http://www.paulmurdocharchitects.com/people-grit.htm

Read the BIOS of the four principals, employed in Murdoch's office....
One can draw your own conclusions as to religious affiliation of these principals...
45 posted on 09/14/2005 11:05:33 AM PDT by thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
The architect stated clearly that it is intended to be a crescent. He denies that it is an Islamic Crescent, even though he drew it in red (fall colours) for the contest entry.
46 posted on 09/14/2005 11:46:28 AM PDT by TaxRelief (follow the money...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000
...it does seem to be deliberately oriented to face Mecca...

And there is a 1 in 360 chance (or 1 in infinity chance if you don't round) that this would occur accidentally.

47 posted on 09/14/2005 11:50:26 AM PDT by TaxRelief (follow the money...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Rosemont

The architects were Paul and Milena Murdoch of California.


48 posted on 09/14/2005 11:53:57 AM PDT by TaxRelief (follow the money...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: metmom

What would the ACLU do if it was shaped like a cross?


49 posted on 09/14/2005 11:55:18 AM PDT by TaxRelief (follow the money...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

Thanks! Grrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!!


50 posted on 09/14/2005 12:02:56 PM PDT by countrydummy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief
The architect stated clearly that it is intended to be a crescent. He denies that it is an Islamic Crescent, even though he drew it in red (fall colours) for the contest entry.

Okay. Please don't take this personally, but "Whoop-de-doo." I couldn't care less about the architect's intent. It doesn't matter. It's background noise. It has no bearing on whether this design is acceptable and/or should be built.

Long after the architect is dead and buried and no one has a clue about what his intent was or wasn't, that memorial IS a crescent and the crescent IS the universally-recognized symbol of Islam.

Therefore, it must not be built. That's all.

51 posted on 09/14/2005 12:15:13 PM PDT by newgeezer (...until the voters discover they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

I'm thinking of doing a single Freep of this place. Somerset is just a few hours away.


52 posted on 09/14/2005 12:22:25 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Where I live Roe V Wade is a decision to be made on how to cross the Susquehanna River.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Therefore, it must not be built. That's all.

Absolutely. Well put. Intentions are irrelevant.

53 posted on 09/14/2005 12:28:52 PM PDT by TaxRelief (follow the money...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

I have a copper nail for each of those trees.


54 posted on 09/14/2005 1:05:50 PM PDT by herb22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

Here's my email to Ms. Norton:

"Hello Flight 93 Memorial Superintendent,

On September 11, 2001, in a brutal fashion, the citizens of these United States were thrust into a conflict the likes of which have not been experienced since the Second World War. On that fateful day, over 40 of my colleagues were killed at the World Trade Center. They never had a chance to rescue themselves or fight back, but the heroes of Flight 93 did. Indeed, those on board that aircraft took measures into their own hands and fought – and won – the first battle of this new war.

With these thoughts in mind, I am writing to you to voice my concern and ultimately my displeasure with the design plan referred to as the “Crescent of Embrace.” Be it intentionally or accidentally, I don’t know, the symbolic representation of the crescent in this proposed memorial is misguided at best and an affront to the heroes of Flight 93 and all Americans at its worst.

When the memorial was initially announced, I was eager for its completion as I wanted to bring my two young sons down to PA for a visit. I wanted them to see and experience for themselves a memorial dedicated to the heroes of Flight 93. However, if the intention of the memorial is to promote “reconciliation” or “acceptance” of those who attacked us on 9/11, I will vow to never visit the site. Instead, I will teach my children about the true events of that day, and I will teach them about the heroes that choose to confront evil and save others rather than to fade into submission.

I urge you to reconsider both the name – and the final design – for this memorial.

Thank you for your time."


55 posted on 09/14/2005 2:40:59 PM PDT by Skywarner (Enjoying freedom? Thank a Veteran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron
Maybe the Park Service feels that there were, after all, muslims aboard that flight, and their sacrifice needs to be honored.

LOL. I think you've plumbed the depths of the bureaucratic mentality.

56 posted on 09/14/2005 2:46:45 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snowrip
I would be interested at what the opinion of this design is from the relatives of those on the flight.

If there is to be an objection to the design it should come from them.

Wonder if they have a group organization to keep in touch with each other?

The more I look at the crescent in the design the angrier I get. BTW, why did I know that the designers would be from California?

57 posted on 09/14/2005 3:47:54 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Where I live Roe V Wade is a decision to be made on how to cross the Susquehanna River.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

On another post, the architect has said he will change the design. We will see.


58 posted on 09/14/2005 6:18:37 PM PDT by AGreatPer (Where I live Roe V Wade is a decision to be made on how to cross the Susquehanna River.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TaxRelief

I have a call into the ACLU about this and they have not called me back yet.


59 posted on 09/14/2005 7:10:17 PM PDT by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

Just WHO came up with this design?

WHAT, if anything, do the families
of those on that flight, have to
say about this?


60 posted on 09/14/2005 7:14:04 PM PDT by the Deejay (THE LADY DEEJAY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson