Posted on 09/08/2005 6:57:07 PM PDT by sissyjane
Edited on 09/08/2005 11:37:58 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
>> WHITE HOUSE MULLED SEIZING RELIEF MISSION // Invoke the Insurrection Act? Bush's senior advisers debated last week whether the president should seize control of the chaotic hurricane relief mission from the governor so that active-duty combat troops could be sent to enforce order... Developing
Update******
Political Issues Snarled Plans for Troop Aid
"WASHINGTON, Sept. 8 - As New Orleans descended into chaos last week and Louisiana's governor asked for 40,000 soldiers, President Bush's senior advisers debated whether the president should speed the arrival of active-duty troops by seizing control of the hurricane relief mission from the governor.
For reasons of practicality and politics, officials at the Justice Department and Pentagon, and then at the White House, decided not to urge Mr. Bush to take command of the effort.
Instead, the Washington officials decided to rely on the growing number of National Guard personnel flowing into Louisiana, who were under Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco's control. The debate was triggered as officials began to realize that Hurricane Katrina exposed a critical flaw in the national disaster response plans created after the Sept. 11 attacks. According to the administration's senior homeland security officials, the hurricane showed the failure of their plan to recognize that local police, fire and medical personnel might be incapacitated and unable to act quickly until reinforcements arrive on the scene..."
".. To seize control of the mission, Mr. Bush would have had to invoke the Insurrection Act, which allows the president in times of unrest to command active-duty forces into the states to perform law enforcement duties. But decision makers in Washington felt certain that Governor Blanco would have resisted surrendering control of the military relief mission as Bush Administration officials believe would have been required to deploy active-duty combat forces before law and order had been re-established. While troops can conduct relief missions without the legal authority of the Insurrection Act, Pentagon and military officials say that no active-duty forces could have been sent into the chaos of New Orleans on Wednesday or Thursday without confronting law-and-order challenges......."
"They wanted to take over MY National Guard." This is what happens when you give a high school typing teacher too much power. What a nut!
She's still looking for a clue, sadly.
It was a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation.
What an idiot!! Does she claim ownership of the corpses too?
Guess you'll have to see who gets their vote in the next election...
It fits with everything else we've learned.
Great info, wait till the 'hearings' and the tapes of the conversations with Blanco and Nagin come out. I also bet there were phone calls to Democratic leaders in congress asking them to help get the Louisiana folks on board so disaster could be avoided. I bet it's gonna get real embarrasing for some democrats.
We live in sad times, when namby-pamby political correctness infects everything, even the right.
The goal isn't to please anyone; it is to save lives.
Hitler would have siezed control...
DAMN Bush doesnt equal Hitler.
Damn, this ruins my day big time
I was so so so sure BUSH=HITLER
heh
I think you might have the nic with the most letters.
Do you have a source about diversion of funds for strengthening the levees?
So far I've just heard rumors, seen no sources.
"President Bush's senior advisers debated whether the president should speed the arrival of active-duty troops by seizing control of the hurricane relief mission from the governor."
Uh, looks like we are doing the "un-named" sources thing here.
I ain't buying it, until someone is willing to put their name on it.
This article highlights what an incompetent boob Blanco is. If the MSM play up this NY Times piece don't they also have to get into what would be driving the White House to want to take over State control. Isn't this an opening to get coverage on the Red Cross/Salvation Amy/LA Homeland Security story?
Where am I wrong? I don't see this story as bad for Bush. In fact the Whwite House prbably leaked it.
I know no more than I read on FR. I am in Australia, just trying to help.
"The goal isn't to please anyone; it is to save lives."
Yes, I know that. My point, in case it went past you, was that President Bush and those around him are doing their very best to alleviate the suffering while the Democrats and their water-carriers in the media are taking a lot of cheap shots at him. They should be ashamed, but they have no shame.
I agree. It's only a matter of time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.