Posted on 09/08/2005 12:47:23 PM PDT by SolidSupplySide
WASHINGTON - New York Times reporter Judith Miller, locked up for refusing to reveal who told her a covert CIA operatives name in a probe that may be nearing a conclusion, works part time at the jail laundry helping clean fellow inmates green jumpsuits and dirty linens.
Between shifts at the laundry, Miller works at the library on a card catalog of the jails books, said attorney Floyd Abrams, offering new details about Millers life behind bars after meeting with her on Wednesday.
Abrams, who represents The New York Times, said Miller was "safe" but that conditions in jail were "grim."
This week Miller marked two months -- 65 days as of Thursday -- at the Alexandria Detention Center just outside Washington for refusing to testify to a grand jury trying to determine who in the Bush administration leaked CIA operative Valerie Plames identity.
Abrams said Miller remained "resolute" and would not reveal her confidential source to a grand jury in the case, which could shake up an administration already reeling from criticism over its response to Hurricane Katrina. The probe has ensnarled President George W. Bush President George W. Bushs top political adviser, Karl Rove.
But lawyers close to the investigation say there are signs that the 20-month-long inquiry could be wrapped up within weeks in a final flurry of negotiations and legal maneuvering.
Asked if talks were under way with special counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, a Justice Department prosecutor, to secure Millers testimony and release, Abrams said: "If there are any discussions, they would be private."
"She is there (in jail) for a reason. At this time, the reason is still there. She made a promise and, unless properly released from her promise by her source, she has no choice but to continue to take the position that shes taking," Abrams said.
He declined comment when asked if Miller, who was sent to jail on July 6 though she never wrote an article about the Plame matter, had reached out anew to her source for a clear release from confidentiality that would allow her to testify.
Attorney Theodore Boutrous, who represents Time magazine and its reporter, Matthew Cooper, said Millers "standoff" with Fitzgerald may be coming to a head.
"Either Fitzgerald still needs Miller or he doesnt," Boutrous said. "Its who blinks first. ... You would think something needs to happen soon, one way or another."
Unlike Miller, Cooper avoided jail by agreeing to testify after saying he received the "express personal consent" of his source to reveal his identity. The first person to tell him about Plame was Rove, Cooper said.
Plames husband, former diplomat Joseph Wilson, said the leak was meant to discredit him for criticizing Bushs Iraq policy in 2003 after a CIA-funded trip to investigate whether Niger helped supply nuclear materials to Baghdad.
Several lawyers involved in the case say Fitzgerald was likely to wrap up his inquiry this fall, if not sooner, though they say they have not heard from his office in weeks.
The outcome could have political implications for Bush, whose approval ratings are already the lowest of his presidency.
After initially promising to fire anyone found to have leaked information in the case, Bush in July offered a more qualified pledge: "If someone committed a crime they will no longer work in my administration."
Prominent Democrats have called on Bush to fire Rove, the architect of his two presidential election victories and now his deputy chief of staff, or block his access to classified information.
Roves attorneys said Rove did nothing wrong and has been repeatedly assured he is not a target of Fitzgeralds investigation.
When Miller was jailed, chief U.S. District Judge Thomas Hogan said she must stay there until she agreed to testify or for the rest of the grand jurys term, which lasts into October.
But if no deal is reached, lawyers say, Fitzgerald could step up pressure by threatening Miller with a longer sentence. Millers attorneys, in turn, could argue she has no intention of testifying and that her continued incarceration is of little consequence to Fitzgeralds case since others have revealed their sources.
LIVING A FLOOR BELOW MOUSSAOUI
An investigative reporter who covers national security and foreign policy issues, Miller is one of about 440 inmates at the Alexandria Detention Center, according to its spokesman, Capt. Tony Davis.
Miller has been in a U.S. jail longer than any other newspaper journalist to protect a source, according to Abrams. The previous record-holder, he said, was a journalist from The Los Angeles Times who served for 48 days.
The Alexandria facility where Miller is being held has housed some of the nations most notorious spies and terror suspects. One floor above Millers cell is Zacarias Moussaoui, the only person convicted in connection with the September 11, 2001, attacks.
Like other inmates, Miller has a small cell, which gets some natural light through a window and is "locked down" for the night at about 11:00 p.m. The cell is equipped with a toilet, a sink and a bed.
Davis declined to discuss Millers daily routine. Speaking generally, he said, inmates assigned to laundry detail help wash jail linens and blankets, as well as green jumpsuits marked with the word "PRISONER."
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Two months?!?
(big yawn)
Call me when it hits two years. I may be mildly interested then.
Karl Rove, who didn't leak anything but was a "source" of a sort, gave permission to the other reporter to release his name.
I don't think there's much doubt why the lawyers refuse to answer the question of whether Miller has asked her source for permission to talk. She can't, because she's not protecting anyone but herself, her crooked employers, Wilson, and Plame, who engineered this whole rotten business.
We know for sure now that it isn't anyone from the Bush Administration, because all the "usual suspects" there already provided media waivers.
Where's nice Mr. Wilson now?? Looking over the divorce papers that Valerie sent him???
I never used the word fire. Bush used "appropriate action." Mclellan used "no longer with this administration.
Bush - "Listen, I know of nobody -- I don't know of anybody in my administration who leaked classified information. If somebody did leak classified information, I'd like to know it, and we'll take the appropriate action. And this investigation is a good thing."
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030930-9.html
MR. McCLELLAN: --that suggests White House involvement. There are anonymous reports all the time in the media. The President has set high standards, the highest of standards for people in his administration. He's made it very clear to people in his administration that he expects them to adhere to the highest standards of conduct. If anyone in this administration was involved in it, they would no longer be in this administration.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/09/20030929-7.html
Born: 26 October 1947
Birthplace: Chicago, Illinois
Name at birth: Hillary Diane Rodham
Hillary and Tensing Norgay were the first to reach Earth's highest point: the summit of Mount Everest in the Himalayas. They reached the top at 11:30 am on May 29, 1953.
They took over five years to select a name?
What did the call her for the first five years?
What a screwed up family!
traitors of a feather, locked together
Thanks for the links but I'm extremely well informed and well acquainted with them already.
My point was plain and stands: The appropriate action and/or firing pertained to illegal leaking of classified information, which this administration would not and did not engage in.
Period.
We're not arguing whether the administration illegally leaked classified info. And at no point did I disagree with you can claim that Bush or McClellan said they would fire someone - that was the media's interpretation of Bush's statement. But the fact is, neither person, in their original statements, caveated anything with "illegal." They never differientied between intentional and uninentional leaks.
Period.
They referred to the leaking of classified information, whcih would be illegal and something nobody in this administration did or would do. If they did they would be dealt with appropriately (i.e. fired). But they didn't so they won't.
That statement is as incorrect as everything else in the article:She has always admitted she had a release from her source but claimed she thought it was obtained under duress and therefore wouldn't talk even with it.
At what point have I disagreed with you that they haven't actually done anything illegal - atleast as proven so far? Let it go.
Take your own advice.
You're the type of person who always has to have the last word aren't you?
Ping....
Have I missed something?
Do you think she's worried that Rove might be under duress?
LMAO!!! I hope Fitz can keep Miller in jail until she rots.
Sooner or later she has to cough up the name of whatever big Democrat she's protecting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.