Posted on 09/07/2005 5:41:44 AM PDT by RGSpincich
Assuming that you are white, sounds like Jesse, et al, are right.
This wouldn't be happening if the victims were white.
The army engineers should have used Nagin and Blanco to plug the levee. And then they could have lined up Reid, Pelosi Boxer, Fat Teddy etc... and used all their hot air to blow the water out of the basin and dry it out. Why didn't they think of that?
So they can bulldoze the city?
No food, no water, no electricity and no phone service to name a few...
If you OWN the home, you must have flood insurance if you are still paying for it. If you own it outright, you could drop the flood, but you deserve what you get living under sea level without insurance. If you live in gubmint housing, who cares? If it's a rent home, the landlord should have insurance. The gubmint can't sieze the lot that it's on,(except for maybe the new Supreme Ct ruling), but they can condemn the house as unfit to live in. That would be a total loss for insurance purposes.
I'm a hurricane Carla survivor from '61. That was the hurricane that started flood insurance pooling from the feds to reduce costs. Not many had flood insurance back then. If you live ANYWHERE on the coast and don't have it, shame on you. It's not that expensive. I think the limit is 16 ft ABOVE sea level, it's optional. I was over that in Seabrook Tx, but carried it anyway. Never flooded, but could have with a cat 4 or 5 storm. Even if you are 20ft high, you also have to take the 13 inch rainfall into consideration.
The liberals who refuse to evacuate? Seems to me they are independents who refuse to enter the giant maw of the gubmint and be ground to a pulp.
i love it! this mayor and governor are idiots that they could watch these people starve and dehydrate while they obviously are getting fed and watered themselves.....simply because they didnt want to encourage them to stay. if i remember correctly, it was their plan to set up these shelters. what were they thinking....the people could stay for a few hours and wade out?
thanks, beckysue.
amen, amen
Cross linking for reference:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1480044/posts
New Orleans Lady SHUTS CNN'S SOLEDAD O'BRIEN DOWN!!!
CNN ^ | Sept. 8, 2005 | self
Posted on 09/08/2005 8:27:28 AM EDT by Poundstone
Anybody just see this lady in New Orleans SHUT DOWN CNN blabbermouth Soledad O'Brien? It was awesome! The lady (whose name I forgot) said her ancestors settled in New Orleans and she's lived there all her life. She said her neighborhood was high and dry, she had running water, and she wasn't going to evacuate. She blasted CNN and the MSM for showing only shots of flooded New Orleans, saying they weren't showing the parts of the city that were dry and inhabitable. Then she blasted the NO city government for failing to implement its own evacuation plan and evacuate inner-city people using buses. O'Brien tried a few times to rebut the "New Orleans lady," but the lady SHUT HER DOWN and seized control of the interview. In the end, O'Brien agreed to take her TV crew to the lady's neighborhood and show that. This was GREAT!!!
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Tell your friends to go here to see the photo.
http://utools.com/DomeBuses.jpg
Please read the thread and develop a basic understanding of what is being discussed before cherry picking a quote. You missed the whole point.
You need some happy meals. A large portion of this city is relatively unaffected and you would know that if you weren't eating the media SWILL.
The Constitution says that they cannot force people to leave their homes.
Lowering the canals would work great if we can just get the water to FLOW UPHILL.
front pg picture in Wash Times shows lights on in downtown buildings in NO.
Let me translate your post.
Slurp Slurp Slurp Baaah Baaah Baaah.
Your post is the sound of a sheep eating the media swill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
