Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deep Impact space collision reveals comets to be fluffy balls of powder
The Guardian ^ | 9/7/2005 | Ian Sample, science correspondent

Posted on 09/06/2005 11:45:24 PM PDT by Swordmaker

To medieval observers, they were mysterious harbingers of doom, but thanks to an unprecedented act of celestial vandalism, scientists have unveiled some of the innermost secrets of comets.

Out is the long-held view of hardened, dirty snowballs hurtling through space. In is the comet as a fluffy ball of powder, blowing puffs of dust whenever sunlight falls on it.

The insight came yesterday when researchers announced the first detailed results of Deep Impact, an elaborate experiment played out in space on July 4. Under the gaze of cameras on nearby spacecraft and more than 70 ground-based telescopes, the Deep Impact probe fired a metre-long copper bullet on a collision course with a 4-mile-wide block of dust and ice known as Comet 9P/Tempel 1.

The 23,000mph collision produced a huge crater and gave scientists their first ever look inside a speeding comet.

"Prior to our Deep Impact experiment, scientists had a lot of questions and untested ideas about the structure and composition of the nucleus of a comet, but we had almost no real knowledge," said Michael A'Hearn, professor of astronomy at the University of Maryland and lead scientist on the Deep Impact project.

Prof A'Hearn's team is still trying to locate the crater the projectile gouged out of the comet, because the cloud of dust produced on impact obscured cameras aboard the Deep Impact probe as it flew past. But measurements of the particles knocked out of the comet during the collision revealed some intriguing details of its make-up.

Most striking is that the comet is not made up of very much at all. "It's mostly empty," said Prof A'Hearn. The fine particles of dust and ice are held together extremely loosely, with pores thought to run throughout. "We have deduced that around 75% to 80% of the nucleus is empty and that tells me there is probably no solid nucleus. That is a significant advance in our understanding," said Prof A'Hearn.

The finding overturns the view held by some scientists that comets were hard balls of solid dust and ice. "The outer several tens of metres of the cometary material is extremely fragile," said Prof A'Hearn whose study is published online by Science Express today.

Images of the comet before impact showed it released bursts of gas and dust into space when sunlight heated up its surface.

When Deep Impact's copper bullet slammed into the comet, it produced a crater estimated to be the size of a football pitch and some tens of metres deep. The impact knocked thousands of tonnes of material into space.

Among the material were a host of organic molecules. Some scientists believe that comets carried these compounds to other planets, releasing them on impact, and seeding them with the building blocks of life. "I'd argue that's more likely now, because we saw this big enhancement of organic material coming out on impact," said Prof A'Hearn.

The researchers were also keen to see if their speeding projectile would divert the comet from its orbit, a strategy that might be used in defence should a comet or asteroid be detected on a collision course with Earth.

"What we have learned is important to designing a diversion technique. Knowing it's highly porous and highly fragile is important and knowing how much material came out, and how fast, tells you how efficiently you can transfer energy to it," said Prof A'Hearn.


TOPICS: Extended News; Technical
KEYWORDS: catastrophism; deepimpact; zaq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: I see my hands
If comets are so loose why would we need to divert one from a collision course with Earth?

A mass of a few million tons is still a few million tons – regardless of density.
21 posted on 09/07/2005 3:15:22 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

This one has potential.


22 posted on 09/07/2005 3:22:39 AM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
Some believe this evidence will hold true for all comets..

The Leonid meteor swarm is supposed to be the rocky debris left by a comet. One gets the impression "comet" might be a catch-all term for "objects composed mostly or entirely of gaseous material in highly elliptical orbits."

23 posted on 09/07/2005 3:27:23 AM PDT by Junior (Just because the voices in your head tell you to do things doesn't mean you have to listen to them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands
If comets are so loose why would we need to divert one from a collision course with Earth?

EPA regulations, probably. Clean Air Act, etc....can't have all those airborne particulates...it's against the law. (smirk)

24 posted on 09/07/2005 3:30:54 AM PDT by ZinGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

25 posted on 09/07/2005 3:52:21 AM PDT by LRS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junior
This one has potential.

I donno. We've had threads before about organic material in space. Lemme mull this one over.

26 posted on 09/07/2005 4:01:29 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Discoveries attributable to the scientific method -- 100%; to creation science -- zero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott
Temperature differential?

What is the volatile material? Dust does not act like a gas... I suggest electricity.

27 posted on 09/07/2005 4:01:58 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Beware of Geeks bearing GIFs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Drammach

Comets... The intergalactic dust bunny.

And coming soon, the intergalactic version of the dreaded BROOM!!!

:-)


28 posted on 09/07/2005 4:08:18 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Raaargh! Raaargh! Crush, Stomp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: I see my hands

Basic physics.

Force = Mass x Acceleration.

Fluffiness doesn't enter the equation at all.

Either way, BLAMM!


29 posted on 09/07/2005 4:16:33 AM PDT by biggerten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

If they are that loosely packed, then a few nukes fired into them should creat a shock wave with all the melting water and methane going up all at once and blowing them apart.

I can't believe all comets are made this way.


30 posted on 09/07/2005 4:19:27 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (Even when a dog discovers he is barking up a wrong tree, he can still take a leak on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
Asteroids and meteroids are a different breed.

Just what are "meteroids", pray tell?

31 posted on 09/07/2005 4:26:40 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
An asteroid (i.e., a solid particle, usually very small) that is entering the Earth's atmosphere, leaving an visual ionization trail. In space, just before entry, it is a meteoroid; after it's landed on earth, it's a meteorite.
32 posted on 09/07/2005 4:31:19 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Drammach
The other 20% to 25%..

It's a small mass, but mass, nonetheless

Yes, but the mass is fixed, and was known beforehand wasn't it? I would think the mass can be determined from observations of the orbital path. The size of the comet is known, so there was an expectation of the object's density. The article indicates that the Deep Impact results show the density is 20 to 25% of the expected value. That doesn't seem to add up.

33 posted on 09/07/2005 5:00:33 AM PDT by Jack of all Trades (Never underestimate the speed in which the thin veneer of civilization can be stripped away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus

I know a meteoroid is but what is a "meteroid". :}


34 posted on 09/07/2005 5:06:07 AM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

A small meter?


35 posted on 09/07/2005 5:30:47 AM PDT by Cincinatus (Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
What is the volatile material? Dust does not act like a gas... I suggest electricity.

It could be electromagnetic – but I can’t visualize the process that would cause material to bleed off from sunlight exposure solely from the electric charge. Even in the far reaches of space sunlight will heat material. Wouldn’t a spot that is slightly warmer then be less dense than its surroundings – and break free from gravitational and electromagnetic forces that hold it in place? There is also the matter of light pressure (think solar sail) brought up earlier.
36 posted on 09/07/2005 5:54:34 AM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
NASA's Deep Impact Adds Color to Unfolding Comet Picture

One of the scientists studying the comet is named Jessica Sunshine. No kidding.

37 posted on 09/07/2005 7:04:18 AM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
The premise of this article is deeply flawed -- they're saying that because this comet appears to be a "fluffy ball of powder," then all comets must be fluffy balls of powder.

Color me highly skeptical.

38 posted on 09/07/2005 7:06:52 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
...size of a football pitch ...

I'm guessing this means the size of a soccer field.

39 posted on 09/07/2005 7:08:33 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cogitator

That's Jessica on the right. I think....

40 posted on 09/07/2005 7:08:43 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson