Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chimp and human DNA is 96% identical
Financial Times ^ | August 31 2005 | Clive Cookson, Science Editor

Posted on 09/02/2005 5:54:45 AM PDT by nfldgirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 09/02/2005 5:54:45 AM PDT by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean

I descended from a mouse.


2 posted on 09/02/2005 6:00:18 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean

Well, there you go. That just proves that chimpanzees evolved from humans.


3 posted on 09/02/2005 6:01:07 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean
Proof: Rep. Waxman


4 posted on 09/02/2005 6:02:19 AM PDT by austinite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean

I like that this report focuses on the differences.

Similar does not mean the same.

It is long been know that other animals and humans have very similar genetic structures. If you do the gene sequencing between humans and lets say a horse, you will find many of the same gene sequences as well.

The big and major difference is that 4%. What the article fails to detail is that the 4% accounts for extended brain functions, speech, reasoning, etc. Those make big differences in the grand scheme of things.


5 posted on 09/02/2005 6:03:51 AM PDT by magnieye (American and Cuban....and proud of both....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean
4 percent of a 3bn character genome is quite a lot of difference. Just being a mammal is probably 2bn in its self.
6 posted on 09/02/2005 6:04:21 AM PDT by PositiveCogins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean

Some animals are more equal than others...........and so are some people...........


7 posted on 09/02/2005 6:05:54 AM PDT by Red Badger (United States Marine Corps.....An army of WON!...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean

Maybe that is why I make funny noises when I scratch my armpits.


8 posted on 09/02/2005 6:08:58 AM PDT by razoroccam (Then in the name of Allah, they will let loose the Germs of War (http://www.booksurge.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PositiveCogins

Silicon used for making computer chips must be pure to something like 12 decimal places (99.999 999 999 999% pure). When I was in college taking physical electronics (dealung with a lot of quantum theory) one of the excercises was to see what effect contamination of one part in a BILLION would make. The result was that it would basically render the batch unuseable.

I suspect that 4% difference between chimps and humans is MUCH more than they are willing to admit. Literally it is the difference between constructin a vessel that will take men to the moon and back and swinging in trees and then picking fleas off each other's back (sorry if I offended tre swinging, flea picking 'Rats).


9 posted on 09/02/2005 6:12:33 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean

Of the 5,000 best-known human genes, 75% have matches in the worm.


10 posted on 09/02/2005 6:15:29 AM PDT by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean
That 4% can spell lots of trouble. After all, most media polls have a margin of error of 3-4% and look at how accurate they are...

Ref: 2000 Election, 2004 Election

11 posted on 09/02/2005 6:16:39 AM PDT by buckeye27 (You can't spell Liberal without Libel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean

4% is huge. All species on the planet are very genetically similar simply because we all exist in the same carbon/oxygen/nitrogen environment, and are carbon-based ourselves. We wouldn't be able to survive on the planet otherwise.

96% really means nothing when 90% of the similarity is based on the characteristics animals need just to exist on Earth.


12 posted on 09/02/2005 6:17:02 AM PDT by DefiantZERO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: austinite

That's f*ckin gross, don't ever do that again..


13 posted on 09/02/2005 6:17:49 AM PDT by DefiantZERO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean

98% identical in New Orleans.


14 posted on 09/02/2005 6:18:59 AM PDT by DTogo (U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean
I love this quote, prompted by the "news":

Darwin wasn't just provocative in saying that we descend from the apes—he didn't go far enough. We are apes in every way, from our long arms and tailless bodies to our habits and temperament. -- Frans de Waal, primate scientist at Emory University

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/08/0831_050831_chimp_genes.html

Are you kidding me?
15 posted on 09/02/2005 6:19:31 AM PDT by Jeff Blogworthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DefiantZERO
I always figured there was at least 4% genetic difference between me and my brother-in-law.

Fortunately it looks like the divorce will happen before there are kids involved.

16 posted on 09/02/2005 6:19:35 AM PDT by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lOKKI

Hey, evolution is a long process, remember? Some apes haven't quite caught up yet..


17 posted on 09/02/2005 6:22:49 AM PDT by DefiantZERO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: magnieye
What the article fails to detail is that the 4% accounts for extended brain functions, speech, reasoning, etc. Those make big differences in the grand scheme of things.

True, but the difference may be small enough that we will soon have bioengineered chimps that are obviously self-aware and that communicate with human-like language.

All kinds of ethical hell is gonna break loose then.

18 posted on 09/02/2005 6:23:10 AM PDT by Spike Spiegel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mean Maryjean
Earlier thread with 116 replies.

This one, number 57, seems of interest.

Whoever told you that somehow human DNA is "50% identical" to that of a tomato, or that human and oranges "share 75% of DNA", either didn't know what in the heck they were talking about, or were being dishonest.

19 posted on 09/02/2005 6:23:55 AM PDT by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I suspect that 4% difference between chimps and humans is MUCH more than they are willing to admit.

Do not be so confident. There are indirect ways of raising chimps to higher linguistic levels, like genetically lengthening their adolescence. You don't have to be able to understand or engineer even 10% of that 4% to make some serious monkey business.

20 posted on 09/02/2005 6:25:42 AM PDT by Spike Spiegel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson