Skip to comments.
Trinational Elites Map North American Future in "NAFTA Plus"
IRC Americas ^
| August 24, 2005
| By Miguel Pickard
Posted on 08/24/2005 6:16:31 PM PDT by Conservative Firster
I would like you [of the press] to understand the magnitude of what this means. It is transcendent, its something that goes well beyond the relationship we have had up to now. President Vicente Fox, regarding NAFTA Plus, onboard the presidential plane returning to Mexico from George W. Bushs Crawford ranch, March 2005.
NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) has been in effect almost 12 years and a new stage, NAFTA Plus, is in the works, referred to as deep integration, particularly in Canada. The elites of the three NAFTA countries (Canada, the United States, and Mexico) have been aggressively moving forward to build a new political and economic entity. A trinational merger is underway that leaps beyond the single market that NAFTA envisioned and, in many ways, would constitute a single state, called simply, North America.
Note: long article
(Excerpt) Read more at americas.irc-online.org ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Mexico; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: border; borders; canada; conspiritorist; doomgloom; garbage; getarope; immigration; mexico; nafta; naftaplus; northamerica; obl; theskyaintfalling; tinfoil; treason; weredoomedr2d2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-128 last
To: hedgetrimmer
Do you work in government? No. I never have, nor do I work for any political party nor organization, in case you were wondering.
121
posted on
08/26/2005 11:20:46 AM PDT
by
Modernman
("A conservative government is an organized hypocrisy." -Disraeli)
To: Modernman
Anyone is free to try to convince the American government to change its policies
It is the American taxpaying citizen who directs government policymaking in a Constitutional government. The federal government must not create policy that effects domestic law based on the persuasions of internationl tribunals, councils or secretariats. In my experience only neocons and neoliberals would find this an acceptable method of governing the American people, mostly because they don't understand or do not support the US Constitution.
To: hedgetrimmer
The federal government must not create policy that effects domestic law based on the persuasions of internationl tribunals, councils or secretariats. If the American people do not like such policies, they are free to vote the government out of office.
There is nothing preventing our government officials from listening to whomever they want when formulating policy.
123
posted on
08/26/2005 12:40:22 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("A conservative government is an organized hypocrisy." -Disraeli)
To: Modernman
There is nothing preventing our government officials from listening to whomever they want when formulating policy.
There is a moral imperative but "free traders" cannot be considered very moral people as they fund slavery worldwide in their search for the lowest possible wages.
This is also why we have a supreme court that refuses to uphold private property rights, but "free traders" don't care if our Justices get their legal support from socialist European Union. You see, since the private property in question was stolen from a private citizen and given to a development corporation, it throws the door wide open for other abuses. This includes international corporations, even the ChiCom corporations can come here and get private land condemned for their use. They can do it because of the "free trade" agreements that say foreign nationals who come here to provide services must be treated the same as "nationals". (See Mode 1- Mode 4, WTO and GATT)
To: Modernman
Have you seen the UN's agenda 21? Do you know what sustainable development means to the folks at the UN?
How do you feel about our leaders that have already signed up with these programs that are telling our government how things must be done?
125
posted on
08/26/2005 1:45:27 PM PDT
by
antisocial
(Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
To: 1rudeboy
To think that all this time I thought of myself as a globalist.... The truth comes out. You're a bigger phony conservative than John McCain.
126
posted on
09/04/2005 2:59:15 PM PDT
by
RoyalsFan
(Freepmail me if you want on my Kansas City Royals ping list)
To: RoyalsFan
To: RoyalsFan
Excuse me for the coarse language. I meant to say, "Piss off, newbie."
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-128 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson