Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evangelist backs off Chavez assassination call
Reuters on Yahoo ^ | 8/24/05 | Reuters

Posted on 08/24/2005 10:35:22 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Conservative U.S. evangelist Pat Robertson, who called for the assassination of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, said on Wednesday he was misinterpreted and there were a number of ways to "take him out" including kidnapping.

"I said our special forces could take him out. Take him out could be a number of things including kidnapping," Robertson said on his "The 700 Club" television program.

"There are a number of ways of taking out a dictator from power besides killing him. I was misinterpreted," Robertson added.

Robertson, the founder of the Christian Coalition and a presidential candidate in 1988, said on Monday of Chavez, one of Bush's most vocal critics: "If he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it."

"We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability." He made the comments during his "The 700 Club" television program.

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld on Tuesday dismissed Robertson's remarks, but the White House remained silent despite calls for repudiation from Venezuela and religious leaders including the Rev. Jesse Jackson.

State Department spokesman Sean McCormack called "without fact and baseless" any ideas of hostile action against Chavez or Venezuela.

The leftist Chavez has often accused the United States of plotting his overthrow or assassination. Alongside Cuban President Fidel Castro in Havana on Sunday, Chavez scoffed at the idea that he and Castro were destabilizing troublemakers.

Chavez survived a short-lived coup in 2002 that he says was backed by the United States. Washington denies involvement.

Venezuelan officials said Robertson's remarks, while those of a private citizen, took on more significance given his ties to President George W. Bush's Christian-right supporters.

"Mr Robertson has been one of this president's staunchest allies. His statement demands the strongest condemnation by the White House," Venezuela's ambassador to the United States Bernardo Alvarez said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: assassination; backs; evangelist; hugochavez; off; patrobertson; venezuela
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

1 posted on 08/24/2005 10:35:24 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

What would we do with him after we kidnapped him?

Stop digging, Pat.


2 posted on 08/24/2005 10:37:13 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Take him out could be a number of things including kidnapping

Idiot.

Either take it back or stand by it.

This fudging fools no one.

3 posted on 08/24/2005 10:37:24 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

*** Take him out could be a number of things including kidnapping,***

Oh, this is really going to make things better.


4 posted on 08/24/2005 10:37:24 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"he was misinterpreted and there were a number of ways to "take him out" including kidnapping."

Oh for crying out loud Pat! That's spin worthy of a liberal Democrat. We all know what you meant so either apologize or stand by your statement. (I prefer the latter)


5 posted on 08/24/2005 10:38:08 AM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Liberals believe common sense facts are open to debate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"You know, I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it." Misinterpreted?
6 posted on 08/24/2005 10:38:20 AM PDT by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"If he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it."

This does not entail kidnapping or any other option. He meant kill him. I knew Robertson would back down. The PC police always make certain of that.

7 posted on 08/24/2005 10:38:37 AM PDT by Tim Long
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Let him keep talking. Maybe this will be his demise.


8 posted on 08/24/2005 10:38:51 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
"If he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it."

Oh, so I guess he was talking about character assassination, or some other type of assassination I guess.
9 posted on 08/24/2005 10:39:41 AM PDT by Tequila25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

come on pat, you're disappointing me. stick to your GUNS


10 posted on 08/24/2005 10:39:46 AM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

Maybe he meant "Take him out" as in "take him to dinner, a movie, and have a good time"??


11 posted on 08/24/2005 10:39:46 AM PDT by Paloma_55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"Just give Chavez a noogie and call him 'Hector, Hector, cootie inspector' - that's all I'm saying," Robertson added.


12 posted on 08/24/2005 10:40:02 AM PDT by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The guy's nuts.


13 posted on 08/24/2005 10:40:56 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

OOPS! Try 'Hugo, Hugo, drives a Yugo'!

;^)


14 posted on 08/24/2005 10:41:02 AM PDT by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Hugo Chavez is offering to sell "poor Americans" cheaper gas (via CITGO?). What are you doing, Pat?

/sarc

15 posted on 08/24/2005 10:41:19 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko
"...either apologize or stand by your statement.

I haven't seen any conservatives or Christians come out publicly and defend his comments. Rush has backed away, nothing from Coulter or Hannity. With his backing down now I guess they won't need to take a public stance.

16 posted on 08/24/2005 10:42:35 AM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cecily
After kidnapping him, you place him in a room with Star Jones while playing Barry Manilow tunes endlessly.

He will go both blind and deaf, they you release him since he will be less of a threat. ;-)
17 posted on 08/24/2005 10:42:37 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"misinterpreted"

Last time I looked in the dictionary, the term "assassinate" meant "kill." I don't think he was misinterpreted.


18 posted on 08/24/2005 10:42:56 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
All the presstitutes are worried about the dumb things that doddering old Pat Robertson says. Meanwhile, they ignore the incendiary and dangerous things that this kook says:

‘New Castro’ threatens to take his feud with America nuclear - (Chavez rattling nuke sabers!)
19 posted on 08/24/2005 10:43:05 AM PDT by Antoninus (Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini, Hosanna in excelsis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blaquebyrd

"Rush has backed away,"

what do you mean rush has backed away? yesterday he said "why didnt you include castro?"


20 posted on 08/24/2005 10:43:20 AM PDT by Stellar Dendrite ( Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the gospel of envy. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson