Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

My CAIR-Inspired Firing [Michael Graham]
Front Page Mag ^ | 8-23-05 | Michael Graham

Posted on 08/23/2005 6:39:18 AM PDT by OXENinFLA

The First Amendment and I have been evicted from ABC Radio in Washington, DC.

On July 25th, the Council on American-Islamic Relations demanded that I be “punished” for my on-air statements regarding Islam and its tragic connections to terrorism. Three days later, 630 WMAL and ABC Radio suspended me without pay for comments deemed “hate radio” by CAIR.

CAIR immediately announced that my punishment was insufficient and demanded I be fired. ABC Radio and 630 WMAL have now complied. I have been fired for making the specific comments CAIR deemed “offensive,” and for refusing to retract those statements in a management-mandated, on-air apology. ABC Radio further demanded that I agree to perform what they described as “additional outreach efforts” to those people or groups who felt offended.

I refused. And for that refusal, I have been fired.

It appears that ABC Radio has caved to an organization that condemns talk radio hosts like me, but has never condemned Hamas, Hezbollah, and one that wouldn’t specifically condemn al-Qaeda for three months after 9/11.

As a fan of talk radio, I find it absolutely outrageous that pressure from a special interest group like CAIR can result in the abandonment of free speech and open discourse on a talk radio show. As a conservative talk host whose job is to have an open, honest conversation each day with my listeners, I believe caving to this pressure is a disaster.

I for one cannnot apologize for the truth and I cannot agree to some community service-style “outreach effort” to appease the opponents of free speech.

If I had made a racist or bigoted comment—which my regular listeners know goes against everything I believe in—I would apologize immediately, and without coercion. When I have made inadvertent fact errors in the past, I apologized promptly and without hesitation.

But we have now gone far beyond that, with demands that I apologize for the ideas my listeners and I believe in. It is not a coincidence that, after my suspension on July 28th, WMAL received more than 15,000 phone calls and e-mails protesting my removal from the airwaves.

Why such a huge response? It wasn't about me; the listeners I spoke to said they felt betrayed by my suspension because the vast majority of them agree with me on the subject of Islam. By labeling my statements as unacceptable, these listeners felt that WMAL management was insulting them, too.

I cannot speak for anyone else, but I care about the listeners of 630 WMAL. I respect them and I appreciate the amazing support they have given me.

I could not dishonor their principled support for free speech by giving into these demands. I cannot join ABC Radio in bowing to CAIR’s wishes. And I will not apologize for my opinions or retract the truth.

The whole point of the Michael Graham Show is what my listeners and I call the “natural truth,” those obvious facts about modern life that the P.C. police and mainstream media believe should never be discussed. That includes the tragic, but undeniable relationship between terrorism and Islam as it is constituted today.

The conversations my listeners and I had on this subject were not offensive or bigoted in the least. In fact, Ibrahim Hooper of CAIR (who has appeared on my show several times) credited “criticism from talk radio” in part for the recent fatwa against terrorism issued by a group of US Muslim scholars. Ironically, it was issued the day before I was suspended.

That’s the real tragedy here. The people who most need free speech and open dialogue on the issues facing Islam today are America's moderate Muslims. These are people of good will who have the difficult job ahead of reforming and rescuing their religion. They need all the help they can get.

The decision to give CAIR what it wants—a group with well-publicized ties to terrorists and terror-related organizations—will make it harder for the reformers to successfully face Islam's challenges. Still worse, silencing people like me will make it easier for Islamist extremists to dismiss all sincere calls for reform as mere "bigotry."

When CAIR is able to quell dissent and label every critic a "bigot," the chilling effect is felt far beyond ABC Radio and 630 WMAL. If anyone is owed an apology, it is the moderate, Muslim community who have been failed once again by the mainstream media.

A very special note to everyone who emailed and called on my behalf:

Again and again through this ordeal, as people pressured me to just give in, say what CAIR wanted to hear and get my job back, I thought of you. I cannot express how much your support meant to me. I don't know that I'm doing the right thing by fighting this fight. I only know that I believe it's the right thing, and I believe it with all my heart.

Your support, your words of encouragement, your anger that the forces of P.C. fear have this much power—these all helped me do what I needed to do. Thank you.

In the coming days, I hope I'll have some good news for you about how we can continue our conversation. So please stay tuned, please stop by here each day and check it.

Trust me, this isn't the last you've heard from me.

Michael, are you sure you've been fired?

I've had several people tell me that ABC Radio says I'm not really fired, that I have "chosen" not to go back to work. I don't know what to say to that except that I received a hand-delivered letter very late Friday announcing that I was "terminated immediately." If there is some other definition of that other than "you're fired," I am not familiar with it.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; abcradio; cair; crushislam; firstamendment; graham; islam; islamicagenda; islamisevil; islamisnotareligion; michaelgraham; muslim; talkradio; wmal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: The Great RJ

On a tangent, radio personality Bob Lonsberry (Rochester, NY) was fired for calling the black Democratic mayor a monkey (by implication only, at that) ... and at the same time the same radio station was running an ad calling Republicans monkeys.


61 posted on 08/23/2005 8:06:24 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

We have a local talk show host named Jay Severin who was the object of CAIR's wrath last year for words they found offensive but they failed in their attempt to get him fired. He was not on the air Monday (I am not sure if he is on vacation this week) but I am sure he will talk about this subject eventually. He is local only but the story made national news and Michelle Malkin, among others, defended Severin.


62 posted on 08/23/2005 8:06:31 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: wildweezel
RE: "I am talking about here is the 1st AmendmentRIGHT TO DELIVER A POLITICAL OPINION" v. a Fairness Doctrine.

I see the distinction you're are making. I still reject the idea. I don't want government to get its nose back under the tent. Perhaps if the threat is across the board and not just a single radio station.

My other reply to you gave me the chance to mention, Walter "North Viet Nam Communists' most trusted man in America" Cronkite. I welcome every chance to say, Walter "North Viet Nam Communists' most trusted man in America" Cronkite. I really like saying, Walter "North Viet Nam Communists' most trusted man in America" Cronkite.

64 posted on 08/23/2005 8:41:20 AM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (Hillary is the she in shenanigans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: highball

>>>This is not a First Amendment issue. As sympathetic as I am to him, his silly hyperbole doesn't help.>>>

I agree. He has no more first amendment right to not piss his employer off anymore than Whoopi had a first amendment right when Slimfast fired her. And she wasn't even on company time.

I DO think ABC is a crock of crap since they cater to terrorists groups (I firmly believe that), but this isn't a first amendment issue.


65 posted on 08/23/2005 8:42:52 AM PDT by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

If we apply CAIR's standards to the Koran, that book would be banned.


Now there's an idea whose time has come!


66 posted on 08/23/2005 8:43:02 AM PDT by BayouCoyote (The 1st victim of islam is the person who practices the lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
"That’s the real tragedy here. The people who most need free speech and open dialogue on the issues facing Islam today are America's moderate Muslims. These are people of good will who have the difficult job ahead of reforming and rescuing their religion. They need all the help they can get."

These people of "good will" need to reNOUNCE Islam. There is no "reform" possible and it cannor be "rescued."

67 posted on 08/23/2005 8:49:26 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: Coop

If I'm not mistaken, Move America Forward linked to an article by Graham on NRO in which he described his recent visit to Iraq. He is a contributing writer at NRO and I think he will soon enjoy that status elsewhere, as well.


69 posted on 08/23/2005 8:56:25 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
CAIR is a terrorist organisation abusing the freedoms of America to undermine its government and eventually install an islamic system of government in its place.

It needs to be shut down and its leadership arrested.
70 posted on 08/23/2005 8:57:52 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Proud member of the 21st century Christian Crusaders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Havok

Welcome to FR!


71 posted on 08/23/2005 8:58:00 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Thank you for posting the info on CAIR's tax status. This was a question I asked a few weeks ago. Any organization affiliated with terrorists and their propaganda organizations should NOT be allowed tax-exempt status. Wasn't there a similar situation with one of the leftist organizations on the west coast where because they were on the government's list of domestic terrorist orgainizations, they lost their status? I may not be remembering correctly. I'm sure someone here knows.


72 posted on 08/23/2005 9:04:42 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: highball
If this is a First Amendment issue, then the liberals can claim conspiracy to suppress their views.

How, pray tell, can liberals claim their views are being supressed?

The Fairness Doctrine has been scrapped. Broadcast radio companies have no obligation to air all political views.

I know the FD was scrapped, and that broadcast stations are under no obligation to broadcast all views, this has nothing to do with the FD. (although IIRC Graham has actually given both sides here, by having CAIR people on as guests) Broadcast stations are, however, under obligation to use the public airwaves in the public interest.......giving into the demands of a private group with KNOWN ties to organizations wishing to destroy this nation is NOT in the public interest and thus feasibily a violation of their licensing obligation.

Is this only my opinion, yes - however it is based upon personal experience in broadcast radio under and after the Fairness Doctrine.

73 posted on 08/23/2005 9:15:36 AM PDT by Gabz (USSG Warning: portable sewing machines are known to cause broken ankles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TrailofTears
"If someone wants to do them damage (and i think we should) for what happened they should bring complaints of misuse of public airwaves, and accusations of a relationship with a special interest group that has definite ties to terrorists organizations. CAIR has had definite ties to those type organizations and that is without a doubt indisputable."

This is an excellent idea, however I disagree that this is not a war against Islam. That is precisely what it is.

74 posted on 08/23/2005 9:16:30 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Yup. The 'fragging' in my unit was several rocks with notes on them announcing "Next time it is a grenade". The Brigade HQ was checking into why morale was so low. They sent up an E-8 to battalion, turned out he was an 0-something. I was actually pleased to see the system work.

We got a new 'management' team headed by a West Pointer. No nonsense, no bull crap guy. Just wanted us to do our jobs. Duh! Go figure.

The staff before him were doing really stupid things and taking unnecessary risks with us. In just one particular incident, I had an NCO sending me to pickup some materials. Turns out, we were really stealing them. He never told us about that part. I ended up with a .45 pointed at my temple. I was not amused.

I could go on, but this is serious thread drift.
75 posted on 08/23/2005 9:17:30 AM PDT by Stashiu (RVN, 1969-70)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: wildweezel

Tell ya what you do. Go on over to PBS and tell them that you have the first amendment right to walk in to their broadcast studios and say whatever you want because it's "the public airwaves". Please post back here when you get on the air....


76 posted on 08/23/2005 12:26:13 PM PDT by isthisnickcool (Get all the incumbents out of politics!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Broadcast stations are, however, under obligation to use the public airwaves in the public interest.......giving into the demands of a private group with KNOWN ties to organizations wishing to destroy this nation is NOT in the public interest and thus feasibily a violation of their licensing obligation.

Once CAIR as an organization has actually been shown to be engaged in illegal activities, then you would have a point. Until then, they're just another group we don't like. The Justice Department investigations are ongoing, and until it's been shut down the organization is perfectly legal.

Be wary of involving the government in private businesses just because we don't like them. Invoking "the public interest" is undoubtedly something the next Democrat president will do against conservative organizations, particularly the ones with ties to terrorists like Alan Rudolph.

77 posted on 08/23/2005 12:59:16 PM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
How long before CAIR figures out that they can go after other radio talk show hosts, columnists or even bloggers?

I'd bet that CAIR is staking out places like FR and blogs all over the place now...

Just damn.

If you want on the list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

78 posted on 08/23/2005 1:01:08 PM PDT by mhking (The world needs a wake up call gentlemen...we're gonna phone it in.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #79 Removed by Moderator

To: wildweezel

That interpretation of the First Amendment is the same that Congress uses in "interstate commerce" to stick their collective nose in where it doesn't belong. It's a reach.

I didn't think that conservatives believed in finding reasons to expand the reach of the federal government. But heck, I've been wrong before.


80 posted on 08/23/2005 1:24:02 PM PDT by highball ("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson