Posted on 08/22/2005 4:30:20 PM PDT by teaser
SAN FRANCISCO – Today the California Supreme Court ruled that children can have two moms. Liberty Counsel filed amicus briefs in all three of today’s cases on behalf of Kristina Sica. Liberty Counsel urged the court to protect the right of a biological mother to direct the upbringing of her children without interference from a nonparent, former same-sex partner.
(Excerpt) Read more at lc.org ...
In related news...
Biology Rules That Children Cannot Have Two Lesbian Moms
What an atrocity. Poor kids.
The hotter the better.
< /yeahlikethat'sgonnahappen >
Fair enough. Someone who has acted as a parent for some time shouldn't be denied visitation rights, even if she is not a biological parent. The Liberty Counsel just needs to cut the crap.
Tell me DoraC, Which lesbian will the child call Mom?
The one without the mullet.
Isn't it great that we have courts that are wiser than God?
IMHO pretending that two people of the same gender can be parents is child abuse. No child should have to be brought up in a sick, twisted, perverted environment like that - and no child should be without a father, if that can at all be helped.
What crap.
We're still trying to get our kids out of that sick, sordid state (CA) of mental illness. No offence to the sane, responsible folks in CA.
The Court explained that there is no “reason why both parents of a child cannot be women.”
This is absolutely insane. Did "the Court" never study basic human biology? I'm so ashamed to be a Californian.
I don't know why you would call it a sick, twisted and perverted environment, but I agree with you that every child should have a father and a mother. Still, same-sex adoption is preferable to children being in an orphanage. But that is not the case here. The child will not be raised by these two women, one of them merely gets the right to visit the child every once in a while. Now, why would you oppose that?
I agree.
Scenario: "Hi Mom. I'm home. Where's Dad?"
I'm all for gay marriage...as long as the two chicks are HOT.
It's not a matter of biology, it is a matter of law, whether you disagree with it or not.
"Unlike the majority, I would apply the controlling statutes as written. The statutory scheme for determining parentage contains two provisions that resolve K.M.’s claim to be a parent of the twins born to E.G. Under one provision, a man who donates sperm for physician-assisted artificial insemination of a woman to whom he is not married is not the father of the resulting child. (Fam. Code, § 7613, subd. (b).)1 Under the other provision, rules for determining fatherhood are to be used for determining motherhood “[i]nsofar as practical.” (Id., § 7650.) Because K.M. donated her ova for physician-assisted artificial insemination and implantation in another woman, and knowingly and voluntarily signed a document declaring her intention not to become a parent of any resulting children, she is not a parent of the twins."
Same ole, same ole, judges making new law.
God made it simple: Honor thy father and thy mother.
Unjust judges will have a special place in Dante's Inferno.
Classic!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.