Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vioxx Maker Found Liable in Man's Death ($253 million in damages awarded)
Associated Press | August 19, 2005 | Kristen Hays and Theresa Agovino

Posted on 08/19/2005 12:04:06 PM PDT by HAL9000

ANGLETON, Texas (AP) -- A Texas jury found pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. liable for the death of a man who took the once-popular painkiller Vioxx in the first of thousands of lawsuits pending across the country.

The case drew national attention from pharmaceutical companies, lawyers, consumers, stock analysts and arbitragers as a signal of what lies ahead for Merck, which has vowed to fight the more than 4,200 state and federal Vioxx-related lawsuits pending across the country. Merck said it plans to appeal.

A seven-man, five-woman jury from a semi-rural county south of Houston deliberated for 10 1/2 hours over two days before blaming the drug for killing Robert Ernst in his sleep in 2001. Jurors rejected Merck's argument that Ernst died of clogged arteries rather than a Vioxx-induced heart attack that led to his fatal arrhythmia.

Jurors awarded Ernst's widow, Carol, $253.4 million in damages, which is a combination of his lost pay as a Wal-Mart produce manager, mental anguish, loss of companionship and punitive damages, In Texas, punitive damages are capped at twice the amount of economic damages -- lost pay -- and up to $750,000 on top of non-economic damages, which are comprised of mental anguish and loss of companionship.

Non-economic damages have no limit in Texas except in medical malpractice cases, which doesn't apply to the Ernst case.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: lawsuitlottery; merck; tortreform; vioxx
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 08/19/2005 12:04:10 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Texans, hang your head in shame for 12 of your fellow citizens.


2 posted on 08/19/2005 12:05:20 PM PDT by flashbunny (Always remember to bring a towel!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
$253MILLION!!!

Why not $253GAZILLION!

I wouldn't advise the widow to go out and buy any small countries yet.

3 posted on 08/19/2005 12:05:40 PM PDT by keithtoo (Howard Dean's Democratic Party: Traitors, Haters, and Vacillators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Boy, that's better than playing the lottery.


4 posted on 08/19/2005 12:06:25 PM PDT by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Loot! Loot! Loot! Wa-hoo!!!

Lawyers are the commissars of American-style socialism.


5 posted on 08/19/2005 12:06:59 PM PDT by headsonpikes (The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aggie Mama

This is why drug prices are so high..it cost much to develop them, 9/10 trials fail. and if you do make a sucessful drug you can get sued for 253 million a person...why in the hell will a company even take a chance and bother to develop drugs..bye bye cure for AIDS, cancer, etc


6 posted on 08/19/2005 12:09:58 PM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Who's REALLY liable?

Was this drug put on the FDA's "Fast track" program?

LOL


7 posted on 08/19/2005 12:10:04 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

That'll teach them to try to help people with arthritis!


8 posted on 08/19/2005 12:10:08 PM PDT by Moral Hazard ("Now therefore kill every male among the little ones" - Numbers 31:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
$253.4 million in damages, which is a combination of his lost pay as a Wal-Mart produce manager, mental anguish, loss of companionship and punitive damages,

Let's see: he must have made ten million dollars a year, he was probably worth another ten million in "companionship" yearly, and got 50 million because he died in great "anguish" while asleep. And all from taking an anti-inflamitory/arthritis painkiller that he probably wouldn't have given up for a million in cold hard cash.

Oh, yeah, that adds up. Did Edwards channel the old guy for the jury or what? And just what kind of morons did they have on this jury?

9 posted on 08/19/2005 12:10:25 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

No way this stands up on appeal. My mother's doc has called the charges against Vioxx "garbage" and continues to prescribe it.


10 posted on 08/19/2005 12:11:30 PM PDT by TheBigB (Gum would be perfection!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

Yep and we'll have them to thank when we no longer have life-saving, pain reducing meds etc.

They have the sheeple convinced that everything should be perfect, no risk to anything etc. Maybe they'll be happy when people are dying before their time and/or leading lives of misery and pain before that.

Here's a warning label for them: Some of those people living in misery and dying before their time will even be members of the free lunch crowd and their attorneys.


11 posted on 08/19/2005 12:12:17 PM PDT by Let's Roll ( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Jurors awarded Ernst's widow, Carol, $253.4 million in damages, which is a combination of his lost pay as a Wal-Mart produce manager, mental anguish, loss of companionship and punitive damages.

I'd like to see a detailed breakdown of this. But I know that will never happen. Cause at least 1/3 will go to the lawyers.

12 posted on 08/19/2005 12:12:20 PM PDT by marvlus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes

"Lawyers are the commissars of American-style socialism."

Lawyers didn't do this.
Twelve citizens of Texas did this.

Why do Americans allow such disputes to be judged by juries instead of panels of experts?


13 posted on 08/19/2005 12:12:55 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

They will find a judge to throw out that ruling. Hope the jury enjoyed their short lived fun.


14 posted on 08/19/2005 12:13:24 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000

Merck stock is plummetting to its death as we speak....


15 posted on 08/19/2005 12:14:38 PM PDT by ContemptofCourt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ContemptofCourt

Down $1.35 or 4.4% - wouldn't call that plummeting.


16 posted on 08/19/2005 12:19:59 PM PDT by razoroccam (Then in the name of Allah, they will let loose the Germs of War (http://www.booksurge.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
...bye bye cure for AIDS, cancer, etc

And bye bye Merck, just like Johns Mansfield due to phony asbestos suits, Dow-Owens Corning due to breast implant suits, etc. Lawyers, and stupid juries, do as much harm to America than their running mates the Democrats, labor unions, and other Communists organizations.

17 posted on 08/19/2005 12:25:19 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13

No wonder every productive business is fleeing the U.S.

We are doing this to ourselves. Too many people are letting too many lawyers siphon too many dollars out of our economy for too few good reasons.


18 posted on 08/19/2005 12:26:57 PM PDT by henkster (When democrats talk of "the rich," they are referring to anyone with a private sector job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot; All

Boy, you guys have no faith in the jury system. Maybe Merck was negligent and that's the reason for the award?


19 posted on 08/19/2005 12:27:43 PM PDT by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Vicomte13
Why do Americans allow such disputes to be judged by juries instead of panels of experts?

Because our judicial system is an adversarial debating contest between lawyers rather than a sytem for discovering the truth. As you suggest, that needs changing.

20 posted on 08/19/2005 12:29:29 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson