Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/19/2005 9:44:20 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker
Ha!Ha!

My genome is bigger than yours!

2 posted on 08/19/2005 9:49:19 AM PDT by Rokurota (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Pelagibacter feeds off dead organic matter that is dissolved in ocean water - lead researcher Stephen Giovannoni of Oregon State University likens it to a very thin chicken soup.

"Waiter, there's something dead in my soup. May I have some more?"

3 posted on 08/19/2005 9:49:34 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I've been trying to lose a little weight and have blamed it on my genes. I think I have too many genes to fit into my jeans. I hope this research pays off and I can shed a few genes.


4 posted on 08/19/2005 9:51:54 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

5 posted on 08/19/2005 10:05:13 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative (France is an example of retrograde chordate evolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
But Pelagibacter on the other hand, accounting for a quarter of all organisms in the ocean, is a shining example of Darwin's principle, the survival of the fittest.

Well, I was enjoying the article until the last sentence. Darwin must be sitting at the Right Hand of God as reward for all that hard work of explaining the design.
6 posted on 08/19/2005 10:07:21 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

It ain't easy bein' gene.......


7 posted on 08/19/2005 10:11:04 AM PDT by Red Badger (Want to be surprised? GOOOOGLE your own name. Want to have fun? GOOOOGLE your neighbor's......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
There are no duplicate gene copies, no viral genes, and no junk DNA.

No duplicates = no redundancy, that is, no back up system.
I know many humans like this.

10 posted on 08/19/2005 10:18:01 AM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Here's the genome map if anyone wants to browse. Click anywhere to zoom in; the colored boxes are genes; several contiguous boxes of the same color denote a single RNA transcript; the arrows are the direction of transcription; click on the box to find out what we think the gene codes for.
12 posted on 08/19/2005 10:34:56 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor (Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory - John Marburger, science advisor to George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
What is more, Pelagibacter has none of the genetic clutter that most genomes have accumulated over time.

There are no duplicate gene copies, no viral genes, and no junk DNA.

If every creature was this elegantly put together, there might, might, be a case for Inteligent Design.

As things are, there isn't.

So9

22 posted on 08/19/2005 10:56:43 AM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Those Poor Poor Rubber Cows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
entrepreneur Craig Venter is trying to create an artificial version of a bacterium, aiming for as few as 300 genes.

Cue the Dr. Frankenstein voice saying "It's alive!"
25 posted on 08/19/2005 11:09:24 AM PDT by contemplator (Capitalism gets no Rock Concerts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Am I the only one that ever wonders WHY we need this information?


28 posted on 08/19/2005 11:23:10 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (If you think you're having a bad day, try crucifixtion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
What is more, Pelagibacter has none of the genetic clutter that most genomes have accumulated over time. There are no duplicate gene copies, no viral genes, and no junk DNA.

Very few bacteria have "junk" DNA or viral genes or duplicate gene copies (probably due to selection pressure), so that is no surprise. "Junk" DNA are of various types and we probably have to live with the use of this term for a long time, even in Science http://www.sciencemag.org/content/vol309/issue5738/twis.shtml .

I wonder when this record (1,354 genes)will be broken; next year?
41 posted on 08/19/2005 12:55:19 PM PDT by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I ain't listening to no peg-legged bacterium.


42 posted on 08/19/2005 12:58:36 PM PDT by Old Professer (As darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good; innocence is blind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

YEC INTREP


50 posted on 08/19/2005 6:16:57 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (The radical secularization of America is happening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson