We have no idea. The global forces behind this just burned the wrong bunch of people.
Posted on 08/17/2005 7:26:21 AM PDT by Alex Marko
Edited on 08/17/2005 7:43:01 AM PDT by Lead Moderator. [history]
Jewish Settler opens fire on Palestinians in the West Bank: Fox News Breaking Story
I'll leave you with these questions......were you equally appalled when the Jewish people were blown up sitting at coffee shops? Riding to work on buses? At a Bar Mitzvah?
If you're a praying person, a person of faith in G-d, not allah, do you pray for Israel? For her safety? For HER concerns???
It is a constitutional issue. If GWB has been working for Israel, he should be impeached.
This is an interesting enough idea that I'd like to explore it further, even if it is a bit off-topic from the original post. What do you think it would take to bring about such an alliance? What form would it take? My guess is that at minimum the Israelis would have to accede to the demands for a Palestinian state, and the the Palis would have to agree to the notion of Israel's right to exist. Those two points alone make me think it is somewhat unlikely.
FWIW I have thought for a long time that the Palis would "win" their "war" against the Israelis if they would adopt non-violent tactics, something akin to Gandhi or the civil rights movement of the 1950s in this country. Then essentially all the nations of the world would be falling all over themselves to jump on the Pali bandwagon, even more so than they do now. But as long as they keep shooting and blowing up kids and other civilians, there will be that element of revulsion for their cause. This was the scenario penned by Clancy in his one novel and I think it might have some credibility.
LOL! Your posts have nothing to do with the Constitution. If you believed in the Constitution you would not be such an anti-semite. And I don't why you are an anti-semite. But you are, and FR is not an anti-semitic forum. Perhaps you should have researched it before you joined today. And I sense troll here as well. You won't last here, and I look forward to your speedy departure.
He doesn't. If, as you suggest, he's working in Israel's interest rather than that of the US, he should be impeached. John Conyers has raised the issue, I believe, another Cindy syncopate.
Prrecisely! Very good example.
Really? Funny, we didn't see you here when the islamists were gunning down and blowing up innocent jews. Where were you?
Nope. It's a logical conclusion. This world is operating with the view there is no Living G-d that rules in the affairs of men.
If their objective was a state, you're right. In fact they "won" at Camp David in 2000. Unfortunately the objective is the destruction of Israel, and they won't get that.
Of course not. And as you said, it is hypothetical.
However, Palestinians have, not hypothetically but in reality, intentionally and deliberately buried slugs in Israeli infant's skulls, as well as grabbing Jewish toddlers by the feet and smashing their skulls against a rock, and also positioning themselves in a crowd of Israeli mothers and babies in strollers aboard buses or in restaurants and shopping malls. Does that not outrage you?
(Crickets still chirping)
So where were you when islamists were blowing up and gunning down innocent Jews? Or don't they count as people?
We have no idea. The global forces behind this just burned the wrong bunch of people.
Didn't he shoot people in a car he drove there?
I'm not so sure I don't see Hitler in the United States of America. Wait -- before you zot me... I don't see him now, but I'm so sick of this namby-pamby give away the store to swine that don't know what to do with a civilization besides crap in it that I'm already ready to vote for a strongman who can restore order. And I'm enough of a student of history to know that that is the predictable end of a Republic. But what are ya' gonna do, let it descend into anarchy and a Blade Runner world? I don't think so. I suppose politically I'd me more of a fascist because I don't believe in socializm in any way shape or form, but I believe it is possible to be a Nationalist without descending to the level of fascist, and that's what I'd like to see here.
But I don't even know if that's possible because I think we need some martial law, and some suspension of the free press in the case of irresponsible, treasonous, and seditious reporting, and some jailing of traitors in Congress, among other places. Put me in the category of Lincoln on the Constitution. No point in following it to the letter if that's going to get us all killed anyway. I'm not ready to die to make an abstract political point. I'm only ready to die for God's Truth, not man's politics.
OK.
And the mortars fell like gentle rains.
That's not even the issue. He does have a moral obligation, speaking on behalf of the majority who voted for him, not to strongarm and coerce a longtime ally into a situation that will seriously compromise, if not endanger, their longterm security.
It appears he drove 4 or 5 of the 6 to work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.