Ping
If she hadn't dumped it all to be a pundit, she probably would have been a judge by now or at least handling cases in front of the SCOTUS.
LOL!!
NICE!!
BUMP!!
I wasn't aware that Joe McCarthy went face to face with the Rosenbergs.
Ping
When Rep. Elliott Levitas (D-Ga.) suggested convening a conference with President Reagan to discuss "the manner of power sharing and accountability within the federal government" in response to a Supreme Court ruling on the matter, Roberts issued a sarcastic and contemptous statement rebuffing this idea, stating "... there already has, of course, been a 'Conference' on Power Sharing. It took place in Philadelphia's Constitution Hall in 1787, and someone should tell Levitas about it and the 'report' it issued."
CLASSIC! He's not as beautiful as Ann Coulter though!
Rules. ...
I'm liking Judge Roberts better and better, but still want to hear from Ann. They'd make a great double-barrelled shotgun against the libs.
OK, who's gonna be the first to invoke "the rule"?
But Roberts isn't a pundit, so I don't really know why Coulter needs to "step aside". In his new position he's going to be a judge, after all, not the minister of anti-liberalism. And unlike Ann he will be deciding what's constitutional and what's not, so his rigorous thinking won't be as "reader friendly," though I dare suggest it will be superior to Ann's.
Not bad. Not bad at all....still no match for Ann though.
Roberts lashed out at them with the fury of Joe McCarthy face to face with the Rosenbergs: "Their slogan may as well be 'From each according to his ability, to each according to her gender."
Roberts issued a sarcastic and contemptous statement rebuffing this idea, stating "... there already has, of course, been a 'Conference' on Power Sharing. It took place in Philadelphia's Constitution Hall in 1787, and someone should tell Levitas about it and the 'report' it issued."
After Roberts is confirmed the Right will continue to be Right.
I too like the way he mocks the liberals in his opinions, reminds me a little of the way Scalia hammers Justice Breyer about his citing foreign law in his opinions :-), The more I read about Roberts, the more I like him
Nothing written above about Roberts rises to the level of Ann Coulter's rhetorical ability.
Roberts might well be able to run verbal rings around Ann, but this author did not pull out examples that give much confidence that that is the case.
The right word would be "Decapitating" (a.k.a. cutting the head off)
It should be mentioned one of those Congresswomen was none other than our 'beloved' Senator Collins.
I must admit when I heard that new addition to the saga it was a delicious bonus.
Dream on.
As the layers are peeled back, it is becoming more and more clear that Roberts is no Scalia, or Thomas and his allegience is to stare decisis, not the constitution.
Really.. Ann Coulter is the leanest meanest RINO exposer of all time..
Roberts is a RINO selected by a RINO.. expecting to horn in on Elephant doins.. He worked for Ken Starr and when Starr fired all "the competent" personal in Clintoons imprunement.. he KEPT Roberts there.. thats a bad sign.. Roberts might be more incompetent than STARR..
Coul·ter: a cutting tool (as a knife or sharp disc) that is attached to the beam of a plow, makes a vertical cut in the surface, and permits clean separation and effective covering of the soil and materials being turned under.. Roberts is just a YES man.. looking for a soft place to land..
silly.
even if you were right in a literary sense, it's neither here nor there in terms of ann's accurate assessment regarding the roberts' selection by the president.