Dream on.
As the layers are peeled back, it is becoming more and more clear that Roberts is no Scalia, or Thomas and his allegience is to stare decisis, not the constitution.
I guess you should tell that to Justice Roberts, who in a question and answer session in '97 stated the Supreme Court has the right to overturn or restrict precedent. Perhaps even reading his responses to the questioning of current Sentors you would have read a response stating a Justice should not rest solely on precedent when arriving at decision in a case. But, I am sorry. I know you prefer to believe a fantasy over reality so feel free to continue doing so.
Document that...