Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Case Against Intelligent Design. The Faith That Dare Not Speak Its Name.
The New Republic ^ | 8/11/05 | Jerry Coyne

Posted on 08/15/2005 9:18:06 AM PDT by hc87

Exactly eighty years after the Scopes "monkey trial" in Dayton, Tennessee, history is about to repeat itself. In a courtroom in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania in late September, scientists and creationists will square off about whether and how high school students in Dover, Pennsylvania will learn about biological evolution. One would have assumed that these battles were over, but that is to underestimate the fury (and the ingenuity) of creationists scorned.

The Scopes trial of our day--Kitzmiller, et al v. Dover Area School District et al--began innocuously...

(Excerpt) Read more at tnr.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: anothercrevothread; creationism; crevolist; enoughalready; evolution; intelligentdesign; makeitstop; notagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 421-428 next last
To: narby
If you're under the impression that falsified and fraudulent evidence is common, then you are mistaken. Such critisism coming from a Christian faith that harbors such frauds as Jim Jones, Jim Bakker, and many others is laughable.

Don't forget those lovable old reprobate comedians Jimmy (I have sinned against you with many hookers) Swaggart , or (that vicious God will kill me) Oral (I usually think of another bodily orifice) Roberts and Benny (I saw Jesus walk into my bedroom and rearrange my socks) Hinn.

Yeah, yeah, I know I'm only touching the tip of the unholy iceberg here, and I didn't even mention any of those child-molesting priests or devil worshipping heretics but ...

201 posted on 08/15/2005 6:31:01 PM PDT by balrog666 (A myth by any other name is still inane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: pby

My conservatism is shaped by my own experience, not by what was said two hundred years ago. I respect the actions of the founding fathers (yes fathers) and I admire the power and poetry of their language, but it does not alter reality.

I have nothing against the belief in a creator God, but I don't know anyone smart enough to know the mind of God in enough detail to lecture me about it.

I believe the people who wrote the Bible did thge best they could to convey their knowledge of God, but they accepted slavery, even codified the rules. They did not know the mind of God.


202 posted on 08/15/2005 6:36:13 PM PDT by js1138 (Science has it all: the fun of being still, paying attention, writing down numbers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Gumlegs

Colin Patterson alert!


203 posted on 08/15/2005 6:37:01 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: pby
"History,

The history of many countries other than those of the Hebrew, some of which predate the Bible, disagree with the Bible.

"archeology

Same goes for archeology, since much of history has been uncovered by archaeologists. Places have been found to exist that are mentioned in the Bible but events chronicled by that book have not been verified.

"Scripture

begs the question, don't it?

" fulfilled prophecy

Whoops. How do you determine what in the Bible is a prophesy? How do you determine the fulfillment of these prophesies? Much can be read into ambiguous text. Which of these prophesies were interpreted as a prophesy that gave very specific details about the future (at that time) that actually came true?

"documented historical eye-witness account

Documented where? Inside the Bible? What independent sources verify these accounts?

"and etc....all side with the claims of Christianity.

Only in the minds of those that really, really want it to be.

204 posted on 08/15/2005 6:38:42 PM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: ml1954
You missed the point (did we all miss the point?)...narby stated that the evidence of science would not lead to a conclusion that Jesus was Deity. I don't agree...I believe that the evidence would and does.

In a comparitive analysis related to evidence...the muslim holy book does not hold a candle to the Bible...God's Word wins hands down.

Start with this expirement...Look under every rock and in every corner of the solar system (and beyond). When you are finished and did not find God, or direct evidence thereof, then we can start to debate His existence.

205 posted on 08/15/2005 6:43:50 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: ml1954
You missed the point (did we all miss the point?)...narby stated that the evidence of science would not lead to a conclusion that Jesus was Deity. I don't agree...I believe that the evidence would and does.

In a comparitive analysis related to evidence...the muslim holy book does not hold a candle to the Bible...God's Word wins hands down.

Start with this expirement...Look under every rock and in every corner of the solar system (and beyond). When you are finished and did not find God, or direct evidence thereof, then we can start to debate His existence.

206 posted on 08/15/2005 6:43:55 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: pby
You, on the other hand, are prejudiced by your lack of faith in God and Scripture...and won't admit it.

When I was a student at Oklahoma Baptist University, and determined to become a missionary, I accepted evolution.

I've rejected God. But I've never doubted the scientific view of the universe in my entire life.

207 posted on 08/15/2005 6:44:42 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: pby
"You know that I don't believe that the Bible is a science textbook...It is much better than a science textbook...Unlike science textbooks, It has not been repeatedly revised due to falsified and fraudulent evidence and theory."

So all the errors in the Bible will remain errors. This is a good thing?

The revisions to text books are only trivially due to fraudulent evidence, evidence that was uncovered and corrected by science. Theories are designed to be falsified and corrected, that way our knowledge gradually converges on the the most accurate explanations.

208 posted on 08/15/2005 6:45:33 PM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
Which part of Canada is owned by Ireland?

Cape Breton :)

209 posted on 08/15/2005 6:46:15 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist (Creationism is not conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Oral (I usually think of another bodily orifice) Roberts

Oral Roberts home town is Tulsa OK. Back in the late 70's there was a live comedy show in Tulsa that was loosly designed around Saturday Night Live.

One of their regular skits was a guy called "Brother Oral Love". He had a white suit on, and his pulpit had a cross with a dollar sign through the middle of it.

Really funny stuff.

210 posted on 08/15/2005 6:47:54 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: pby
Unlike science textbooks, It has not been repeatedly revised due to falsified and fraudulent evidence and theory.

So slavery is OK, and dietary laws are back.

And stoning. Let the stonings begin.

211 posted on 08/15/2005 6:47:57 PM PDT by js1138 (Science has it all: the fun of being still, paying attention, writing down numbers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: pby

Start with this expirement...Look under every rock and in every corner of the solar system (and beyond).

Well, at least you gave it a shot.

However, I don't think I can fit this experiment into my schedule.

I estimate that no matter how far along I get in this endeavor it will always take me longer than the current age of the universe to finish and I don't think I can find the time.

212 posted on 08/15/2005 6:50:11 PM PDT by ml1954
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
" fulfilled prophecy ... Whoops. How do you determine what in the Bible is a prophesy? How do you determine the fulfillment of these prophesies? Much can be read into ambiguous text. Which of these prophesies were interpreted as a prophesy that gave very specific details about the future (at that time) that actually came true?

That's like trying to find fulfilled prophesies of Nostradamous. They're so vague that anything will fit the predictions.

In Revelations alone, the text is so wierd that you can read anything into it.

213 posted on 08/15/2005 6:50:20 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: narby
The Kansas school board involved itself in science by force.

Force? The Kansas school board is involved by virtue of winning elections. It is the other side that relies on courts to gag the opposition.

214 posted on 08/15/2005 6:51:32 PM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: js1138
"Are you suggesting that reality is shaped by political resolutions?"

I am not.

I am suggesting that, given historical documentation on the genesis of our freedoms/liberties and the formation of our representative republic, it is proposterous to presume that a stand for the belief in Creator God is damaging to conservatism.

He was the foundation for our freedoms and our represenative republic, thus conservatism.

215 posted on 08/15/2005 6:51:48 PM PDT by pby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: pby
I am suggesting that, given historical documentation on the genesis of our freedoms/liberties and the formation of our representative republic, it is proposterous to presume that a stand for the belief in Creator God is damaging to conservatism.

So when the left gets a genuine hard science in their hands like evolution to demonstrate how superstitious and uneducated conservatives are, you don't think this will damage our electability?

What a fantasy world you are in.

216 posted on 08/15/2005 6:55:08 PM PDT by narby (There are Bloggers, and then there are Freepers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: pby
"I was unaware that it was open for debate among conservatism that Creator God existed.

It is open for debate by any right thinking person.

"All this time, the founding fathers' premise/belief that our inalienable rights were endowed by our Creator were mythological in origin?

Did they specify which creator?

"It could have been, or might have been, Zeus who gave us these rights?

Perhaps it was other humans that gave those rights?

"Why doesn't our money state "IN ZEUS WE TRUST"?

Because America is not ancient Greece. Btw, the founding fathers did not put that on money.

217 posted on 08/15/2005 6:57:04 PM PDT by b_sharp (Science adjusts theories to fit evidence, creationism distorts evidence to fit the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: pby
I am suggesting that, given historical documentation on the genesis of our freedoms/liberties and the formation of our representative republic ...

I'm familiar with the speeches of many of the Founders. They were religious men, most of them. But it's funny that the Constitution makes no mention of your claim. Nor the Federalist Papers. Must have been an oversight.

218 posted on 08/15/2005 7:01:11 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: b_sharp
Btw, the founding fathers did not put that on money.

Anyone who looks to the text of Federal Reserve notes to bolster his faith is in deep spiritual trouble.

219 posted on 08/15/2005 7:02:36 PM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas. The List-O-Links is at my homepage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: hc87

Eep Eep Eep Eep Eep


220 posted on 08/15/2005 7:04:20 PM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 421-428 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson