Posted on 08/12/2005 4:40:56 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob
Enough has come out about the failure of the 9/11 Commission to include critical information about Mohammed Atta and other 9/11 attackers, to suggest a new Commission to investigate the original Commission. The cure may not be that drastic, but it is that important.
In short, a special Army intelligence operation known as Able Danger identified Atta and four of his accomplices, and identified Al-Qaeda cells in Hamburg and Brooklyn and elsewhere, a year before the 9/11 attacks. They offered then to share that information with law enforcement agencies including the FBI.
Those offers were cut off by Clinton Administration attorneys and based that refusal on the wall of separation memo written by Jamie Gorelick, then a deputy under Attorney General Janet Reno. By the time 9/11 staffers received multiple briefings on Able Dangers findings and efforts, Ms. Gorelick had become a member of that Commission.
All details now known, and some reasonable speculation on why Ms. Gorelick wrote that memo, and why the Administration wanted to prevent prosecutors from receiving information from intelligence agencies, is well covered in an article by my colleague, Gregory Borse. His title is, Gorelick 'MemoGate': It Just Got Worse, and is here: http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=16201
I deal here with two aspects not addressed by Greg -- the fascinating nature of the research done by Able Danger, and the solution Congress can apply to this festering problem.
Open Source means using sources that are out in public. It seems like a contradiction in terms that highly secret information can be derived from documents, articles, speeches, radio and TV broadcasts made in public, in front of God and everybody, as they say hereabouts.
Imagine a jigsaw puzzle with no picture on the box, you dont know how many pieces there are, the pieces are each hidden in a pile of other pieces that arent part of the puzzle, and the pieces are anywhere in the world and written in languages from English to German to Farsi. For a fictional (but accurate) depiction of this process, rent and review an excellent movie, Three Days of the Condor, starring Robert Redford and Faye Dunaway.
Or use this real example. Three decades ago, I attended a speech by Isaac Asimov at Johns Hopkins University. I still remember one particular aspect of Dr. Asimovs talk. He said, Japanese or German spies during WW II could have discovered Americas most secret scientific project, using information the federal government required to be published.
Here is Dr. Asimovs thinking: 1. Analog Science Fiction & Fact has gone through several changes of name and control, but has always carried articles based on sound science. (Think the accurate science of Arthur Clarkes 2001" series, rather than the bad science of George Lucas Star Wars. There is no air in space for Ti fighters to bank against, nor to transmit any sound of exploding Death Stars or planets. But I digress.)
2. As a result, many of Americas hard scientists subscribe to Analog. 3. The Post Office required every magazine with a second-class mailing permit to recount, once a year, the circulation of its paid subscriptions. 4. Therefore, Analog published information showong a statistical bulge, a rat in the snake, a group of scientists appearing first in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and then in Los Alamos, New Mexico. 5. Since there was no new university or other private employer who hired these scientists, this had to indicate some type of government-sponsored scientific research.
So it was. This open source investigation, with some common sense employed, would have led a spy to the location of the Manhattan Project, which developed the first atomic bomb.
Now, we turn to the solution to this 9/11 Commission problem. It is a normal duty of Congress to exercise oversight concerning all federal agencies. The Commission is/was a federal agency. Its failures concerning the Able Danger research is a very focused inquiry. Therefore, an appropriate Committee of Congress should and can convene an inquiry to get to the bottom of this problem.
How fast can Congress act? Well, it ginned up a hearing on steroid use in baseball on 30-days notice. It seems to me that the 9/11 failure is slightly more important than that. So start your steroid clocks now. Lets see if Congress can get Jamie Gorelick on camera and under oath within 30 days. Let the 9/11 9/11" hearings begin.
About the Author: John Armor is a First Amendment attorney and author who lives in the Blue Ridge Mountains of North Carolina. John_Armor@aya.yale.edu
Couple that with the opportunity to have these new documents in hand and Jamie Gorelick on the stand under oath. Yes, I think some hay can definitely be made NOW, especially since anyone who can read without moving their lips knows now that the 9/11 Commission failed seriously.
John / Billybob
The.....9-11 Commission on the 9-11 Con-Mission?
I think a nice fat lawsuit by victims families of 9/11 against the administration of the time and all those involved would be a nice big fire cracker put under their butts.
Billybob:
When I first heard this from Weldon, he mentioned that the lawyers forbade the passing of the information on to the FBI was because "they were here on legal visas". Turns out that this was a bogus reason, but to me it doesn't seem to have anything to do with the "wall". That may have been the lawyers' reason, but that's not how I heard it.
I haven't heard everything that Weldon has said, but I don't recall him mentioning the "wall".
That's not to say that Gorelick and the commission don't deserve to be pillaried. They are a fraud.
No, wrong. That wont happen. You don't attack the folks who know all the secrets. That would be a very bad move on the part of those who wish to keep certain information in the dark.
The Roosevelt Administration put a real secrecy clamp on all US Scientists doing any sort of atomic research. Once the Manhattan project was approved, those hired to work on it were sworn to total secrecy. They published nothing about their research. Since every effective researcher we had was put on the project, publications on the nature of Atoms went from several a year to zero per year.
It occured to me that some Soviet Scientists had to be following those publications in the 1930s. The fact that nothing was published after the Manhattan project was approved would have and likely did stand out like a sore thumb.
The Sherlock Holmes line, "The dog did nothing in the night time!" was no more revealing than the "American nuclear scientists published nothing after 1942!"
Not only should there be a 9/11 Commission, Commission...
but I think it should start on 9/11...but, since 9/11 is on a Sunday...then on 9/12!
a good idea, but it takes a long time, and the entire establishment would be against them at every turn.
An an excellent one at that, CB. I'll contribute a bump or two. Front burner it is.
Perhaps a massive demonstration march to the Capitol, followed a burning of all of our '911 commission report' copies *may* just get some coverage.
As long as the same people pick members for this commission as did last time, it will be the 9/11 9/11 cover-up cover-up.
Someone is going to convene a hearing on this. If the truth comes out, it will probably be by accident.
Something the MSM seems to have lost it's touch at reporting lately for years.
Death , Dishonor, Destruction
Clintoon's 3D Legacy?
GORELICK GATE: Developing... Thx Backhoe!
FR Archives Search Results for Gorelick Wall
Oh, by the way, the follow up to "Open Letter to the MSM" is about 25% complete. I have to keep starting over, due to new issues and information. I plan to take issue with those nuts on Daily Kos who called the article "uniformed" I've been keeping score since the original, so the article is to see just who is really winning at this stage between the MSM and folks like you and me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.