Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Commission Coverup?
New York Post Online ^ | August 12, 2005 | Deborah Orin

Posted on 08/12/2005 2:04:02 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta

IT'S starting to look as if the 9/11 Commission turned a blind eye to key questions that could embarrass one of its own members — Clinton-era Justice Department honcho Jamie Gorelick.

This week brought the stunning revelation that elite military spies pinpointed Mohammed Atta and three other hijackers as a terror cell more than a year before 9/11 — but were barred from alerting lawmen to try to lock them up.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 911commission; atta; gorelick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: Chevy Sales
called "the wall" so the FBI and CIA could not share or use or talk

To possibly thwart any criminal investigation into Slick's Chinese dealings, both business wise and politically.

21 posted on 08/12/2005 3:36:07 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

"This is a very interesting story, and just may be what we needed to put a stop to a Clinton 08 run for the White House."

It can't help her, that's for sure.


22 posted on 08/12/2005 3:36:09 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: backhoe

Do you know if Gorlick's 'wall' was implimented via an Executive Order from Slick? I think it was?


23 posted on 08/12/2005 3:38:50 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Do you know if Gorlick's 'wall' was implimented via an Executive Order from Slick? I think it was-

Offhand, I don't recall the origin of that. It will be interesting to find out.

24 posted on 08/12/2005 3:41:47 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into the Dawn of Information...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
It will be interesting to find out.

I'll help you look.

25 posted on 08/12/2005 3:44:19 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
It will be interesting to find out. I'll help you look.

Let me know what you find-- I'm tied up today with domestic stuff.

26 posted on 08/12/2005 3:51:16 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old Keyboard Cowboy, ridin' the trakball into the Dawn of Information...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
Why were they barred from alerting local lawmen and why?

I think it was done to protect democratic dealings. I have no proof of this, it just fits.

27 posted on 08/12/2005 3:52:39 AM PDT by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/clinton-subjects.html

It's a start.

28 posted on 08/12/2005 3:52:52 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

A green card as well as a visa? Because I heard that Atta had the visa, but not the green card.


29 posted on 08/12/2005 3:54:18 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
IT'S starting to look as if the 9/11 Commission turned a blind eye to key questions that could embarrass one of its own members — Clinton-era Justice Department honcho Jamie Gorelick.

And good old grandfatherly and "reassuring" Lee Hamilton is just one of the all-time, all star governmental COVERUP ARTISTS.

30 posted on 08/12/2005 3:55:04 AM PDT by beyond the sea ("If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball." - Jack Lemmon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon

Plain and simple!


31 posted on 08/12/2005 3:55:43 AM PDT by beyond the sea ("If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball." - Jack Lemmon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

Able Danger, the 9/11 Commission & the Strange (But Now Explainable) Actions of Sandy Berger

By Sean Osborne, Senior Analyst & Military Affairs Expert


& Douglas J. Hagmann,Director


10 August 2005: Hey America… do you remember the strange actions of President Clinton’s national security adviser Sandy Berger during the 9/11 Commission investigation when he removed highly classified terrorism documents that should have been turned over to that independent commission? Did you ever wonder what Berger was attempting to hide and even more importantly, why? Did you also wonder why, even though he committed a felony, he received nothing more than a slap on the wrist while various political and intelligence officials played down his actions, wanting them to disappear as quickly as possible? It appears that we just might have discovered the answers to these and other troubling questions: Able Danger.


Able Danger is the code name of a secret team of U.S. Army military intelligence operatives created in 1999 under a directive signed by General Henry H. Shelton, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to assemble information about al Qaeda networks around the world. In mid-2000, the Able Danger team discovered the existence of the key 9/11 terror cell of Mohammed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawar al-Hamzi inside the U.S. and recommended to their military superiors that the FBI be called in to “take out that cell,” according to Representative Curt Weldon, the Pennsylvania House member and vice chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. That information was presented in the summer of 2000 in the form of a chart complete with photographs of the terrorists to the Pentagon's Special Operations Command headquarters in Tampa, Florida. Our intelligence was dead-on accurate, but was not acted upon a full year before the 9/11 attacks.


In fact, Representative Weldon said Able Danger members had recommended that the information they uncovered be shared with the FBI, but the idea was rejected and they “were directed to take those 3M yellow stickers and place them over the faces of Atta and the other terrorists and pretend they didn’t exist.”


Despite the findings of Able Danger, absolutely no action was pursued to take out the cell during the weeks leading up to the 2000 presidential election, said Weldon. The reason? Mohammed Atta possessed a “green card” at the time. Under the rules of the Clinton Justice Department, lawyers working for Special Operations decided that anyone holding a green card had to be granted essentially the same legal protections as any U.S. citizen. They did not want to recommend that the FBI go after someone holding a green card, Weldon told his House colleagues on June 27, 2005 during a speech, known as a “special order,” which he delivered on the House floor. Defense Department lawyers were also said to be reluctant to suggest a bold action by FBI agents after the bureau’s disastrous 1993 strike against the Branch Davidian religious cult in Waco, Texas.


Read Curt Weldon’s June 27, 2005 Testimony This week, Representative Weldon and a former defense intelligence official said they had spoken with three Able Danger team members, all still working in the government, including two in the military, and that they were consistent in asserting that Mohammed Atta's affiliation with a Qaeda terrorism cell in the United States was known within the Defense Department by mid-2000 but was not acted upon. Further and after the fact, the 9-11 Commission was reportedly never told about Able Danger or its findings.


Enter Sandy Berger – During the 9/11 Commission


While the investigation by the 9/11 Commission was in progress, Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, who served as Clinton's national security adviser for all of President's Clinton’s second term, was caught removing documents from the national Archives – the very same documents that should have been turned over to the independent commission probing the September 11, 2001, terror attacks. Berger ultimately admitted to intentionally taking and destroying various classified documents relating to terrorism collected under the Clinton administration. Berger and his lawyer said on July 19, 2004 that he knowingly removed the handwritten notes by placing them in his jacket, pants and socks, and also “inadvertently” took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio. Those documents reportedly included an assessment of America's terror vulnerabilities at airports, something very relevant to Able Danger’s findings and key to the 9/11 attacks. What Sandy Berger did was a felony, yet was allowed a generous plea agreement of a fine and a three-year suspension of his security clearance.


Under the prism of Able Danger, we are now able to make sense out of the previously curious actions of Sandy Berger.


Able Danger & the Saga of the 9/11 Commission; Warren Commission Redux

Go Able Danger, the 9/11 Commission & the Strange (But Now Explainable) Actions of Sandy Berger

By Sean Osborne, Senior Analyst & Military Affairs Expert


& Douglas J. Hagmann,Director


10 August 2005: Hey America… do you remember the strange actions of President Clinton’s national security adviser Sandy Berger during the 9/11 Commission investigation when he removed highly classified terrorism documents that should have been turned over to that independent commission? Did you ever wonder what Berger was attempting to hide and even more importantly, why? Did you also wonder why, even though he committed a felony, he received nothing more than a slap on the wrist while various political and intelligence officials played down his actions, wanting them to disappear as quickly as possible? It appears that we just might have discovered the answers to these and other troubling questions: Able Danger.


Able Danger is the code name of a secret team of U.S. Army military intelligence operatives created in 1999 under a directive signed by General Henry H. Shelton, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to assemble information about al Qaeda networks around the world. In mid-2000, the Able Danger team discovered the existence of the key 9/11 terror cell of Mohammed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawar al-Hamzi inside the U.S. and recommended to their military superiors that the FBI be called in to “take out that cell,” according to Representative Curt Weldon, the Pennsylvania House member and vice chairman of the House Armed Services Committee. That information was presented in the summer of 2000 in the form of a chart complete with photographs of the terrorists to the Pentagon's Special Operations Command headquarters in Tampa, Florida. Our intelligence was dead-on accurate, but was not acted upon a full year before the 9/11 attacks.


In fact, Representative Weldon said Able Danger members had recommended that the information they uncovered be shared with the FBI, but the idea was rejected and they “were directed to take those 3M yellow stickers and place them over the faces of Atta and the other terrorists and pretend they didn’t exist.”


Despite the findings of Able Danger, absolutely no action was pursued to take out the cell during the weeks leading up to the 2000 presidential election, said Weldon. The reason? Mohammed Atta possessed a “green card” at the time. Under the rules of the Clinton Justice Department, lawyers working for Special Operations decided that anyone holding a green card had to be granted essentially the same legal protections as any U.S. citizen. They did not want to recommend that the FBI go after someone holding a green card, Weldon told his House colleagues on June 27, 2005 during a speech, known as a “special order,” which he delivered on the House floor. Defense Department lawyers were also said to be reluctant to suggest a bold action by FBI agents after the bureau’s disastrous 1993 strike against the Branch Davidian religious cult in Waco, Texas.


Read Curt Weldon’s June 27, 2005 Testimony This week, Representative Weldon and a former defense intelligence official said they had spoken with three Able Danger team members, all still working in the government, including two in the military, and that they were consistent in asserting that Mohammed Atta's affiliation with a Qaeda terrorism cell in the United States was known within the Defense Department by mid-2000 but was not acted upon. Further and after the fact, the 9-11 Commission was reportedly never told about Able Danger or its findings.


Enter Sandy Berger – During the 9/11 Commission


While the investigation by the 9/11 Commission was in progress, Samuel R. "Sandy" Berger, who served as Clinton's national security adviser for all of President's Clinton’s second term, was caught removing documents from the national Archives – the very same documents that should have been turned over to the independent commission probing the September 11, 2001, terror attacks. Berger ultimately admitted to intentionally taking and destroying various classified documents relating to terrorism collected under the Clinton administration. Berger and his lawyer said on July 19, 2004 that he knowingly removed the handwritten notes by placing them in his jacket, pants and socks, and also “inadvertently” took copies of actual classified documents in a leather portfolio. Those documents reportedly included an assessment of America's terror vulnerabilities at airports, something very relevant to Able Danger’s findings and key to the 9/11 attacks. What Sandy Berger did was a felony, yet was allowed a generous plea agreement of a fine and a three-year suspension of his security clearance.


Under the prism of Able Danger, we are now able to make sense out of the previously curious actions of Sandy Berger.


Able Danger & the Saga of the 9/11 Commission; Warren Commission Redux

The rest of article at:

http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/default.htm




32 posted on 08/12/2005 4:00:23 AM PDT by conservativecorner (It's a cult of death and submission to fanatics Larry!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Those inhibitions reached their peak destructiveness with Attorney General Reno’s “Procedures for Contacts Between the FBI and the Criminal Division Concerning Foreign Intelligence and Foreign Counterintelligence Investigations,” issued in July 1995. Immediately dubbed “the Wall,” the 1995 guidelines erected a mind-boggling and ultimately lethal set of impediments to cooperation among all relevant anti-terrorist personnel.
33 posted on 08/12/2005 4:00:52 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner
The reason? Mohammed Atta possessed a “green card” at the time.

According to whom? Anyone know? Trust but verify :)

34 posted on 08/12/2005 4:03:24 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
According to this form at the Smoking Gun, Atta was here on a student visa. Which expired, IIRC.
35 posted on 08/12/2005 4:06:36 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
It could be a visa - I heard something mentioned on the radio about Atta and green card in the same sentence when I was busy doing something else.

Either way, the Clinton administration used this as an excuse to leave Atta alone. Bill Clinton is responsible for 9/11.

36 posted on 08/12/2005 4:07:28 AM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta

Well, legally there is a very big difference between being a green card holder and not. If Atta didn't even have a green card, the legal argument for not passing along the info goes up in smoke even quicker.


37 posted on 08/12/2005 4:09:06 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
If Atta didn't even have a green card, the legal argument for not passing along the info goes up in smoke even quicker.

I'm just going on recollection here, but my understanding was that all he had was a visa, which had expired.

38 posted on 08/12/2005 4:33:08 AM PDT by Bahbah (Air America: kids-for-kilowatts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Atta didn't have a green card. He would have had to have had a sponsor and undergo an FBI check. He was here on an expired student visa.


39 posted on 08/12/2005 4:36:29 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun

Yes Presidential Directive 24 issued in 94,to learn why read "how China Gate led to 9/11"By Jean Pierce Frontpagemagazine.com May25,2004


40 posted on 08/12/2005 4:41:57 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson