Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man killed by Sunrise police in drug raid had 2 ounces of marijuana
http://www.newsday.com/ ^ | August 10, 2005 | Brian Haas & Kevin Smith

Posted on 08/11/2005 1:12:44 PM PDT by freepatriot32

SUNRISE -- Police seized 2 ounces of marijuana at the home of Anthony Diotaiuto after shooting him 10 times, according to information on the drug raid released Tuesday.

Also Tuesday, while many friends and relatives of the 23-year-old bartender and student mourned him at a Davie funeral home, others appeared at a Sunrise City Commission meeting to demand an explanation for the fatal raid

"Do 2 ounces of marijuana constitute a death warrant?" asked Sunrise resident William de Larm, a friend of Diotaiuto's.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2; badcops; banglist; bongbrigade; by; donutwatch; drug; fixatedonleroy; had; in; jackbootedthugs; killed; leosgonewild; libertarians; man; marijuana; of; onepotheaddown; ounces; police; policestate; raid; sunrise; swatteam; thatsmrleroytoyou; warondrugs; wod; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 501-517 next last
To: 7thOF7th

"The Police identified themselves and the perp grabbed a gun"

How you know? Because the thugs who shot him said he did?
Since when does a guy who goes to school, works two jobs, and plans a vacation to visit his grandmother go for a gun over marijuana?

But you're right in the end. Any American today who doesn't realize the today's cops will effect your death over the simplist of violations is a friggin idiot.


281 posted on 08/11/2005 3:56:00 PM PDT by takenoprisoner (illegally posting on an expired tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
"The actions of the police officers did far more damage than taking no action at all would have - there was no violence at all except for the police violence."

What about the action of the perp? He is the one who failed to comply with a lawful order. He chose to go for a gun and he chose to engage in the sale of illicit drugs. Come on, this person made poor choices not the Police.
282 posted on 08/11/2005 4:00:14 PM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: G32

You haven't lived under a Democrat-controlled government, I take it. It's real easy for that to be extended to guns, or Christian-related activities. And there's no principle that you stand on here that would or could stop such a small change in the law.


283 posted on 08/11/2005 4:00:57 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Free Michael Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: 7thOF7th

Did he? What do we have to show that? Besides the word of the people who killed him? Is there a videotape?


284 posted on 08/11/2005 4:01:38 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Free Michael Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Nov3
What an elitist attitude! You come across as a narrow-minded narcissist.
285 posted on 08/11/2005 4:03:55 PM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: 7thOF7th

He's trying to tell you that, having been here under Clinton, those of us with longer FR tenures tend to be more circumspect about police actions than do some of our newer contributors. Do Ruby Ridge or Waco mean anything to you?


286 posted on 08/11/2005 4:06:30 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Free Michael Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Antonello
Do you realize that you are actually making a very good logical case supporting mandatory registration of guns? You and others who are posting similar boasts of intent to shoot at law enforcement agents serving a warrant at your home are indicative of why those officers would really like to know in advance if there is the likelihood that their target has a gun.

Nice strawman there buddy. I merely asserted that if you come to my house after hours and kick in the door, break the window or otherwise, startle me by creating a loud disturbance on my property I am going for my gun.

Sounds like a "logical case" for why no-knock search warrants should be used rarely if ever, and only in the case known high-risk offenders after all other possible considerations have been exhausted.

That's they are supposed to be used. BTW.

287 posted on 08/11/2005 4:08:22 PM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

To: Nov3
... The morons supporting this - in general - all signed up after 2000 when the mean and median IQ on this site plummeted. ...

I'm convinced that we are as infiltrated as is possible. These fools come on here, pretend to be the most cartoonish of conservatives, the most embarrassing and narrow-minded caricature of conservatives, and they do it to force reasonable people from our ranks. Please remember this, the caricature you are arguing with may well be a liar, simply pretending the role in order to stir the pot. I encourage everyone to consider this when reading our opinions; consider the deceit and the goals of the deceitful ones.

288 posted on 08/11/2005 4:10:21 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Antonello
Hmm, maybe busting someone known to have a gun in public with the potential for innocent bystanders that could end up being shot/taken hostage/interfering with the arrest/etc. has its downside too.

So now the guy goes from suspected petty weed dealer to hostage taker all because of a Concealed Carry Permit. Riiiight.

289 posted on 08/11/2005 4:15:19 PM PDT by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

I'm convinced all the WOD supporters on this board are personally profiting from it.


290 posted on 08/11/2005 4:15:27 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Free Michael Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

I really think some of them are leftist plants trying to make us look bad.


291 posted on 08/11/2005 4:18:11 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I'm convinced all the WOD supporters on this board are personally profiting from it.

While I sorta agree and definately appreciate where you are coming from I think that not all of them do. There are many people in the real world who have somehow, even tangentally, been negatively affected by someone's pot usage, and that has developed into an emotional issue, and as you and I have argued before, emotions really skew the arguments.

292 posted on 08/11/2005 4:20:29 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
All I can say is knowledge is perishable and intellect is acquired. There are no windows of enlightenment which close by virtue of a membership seniority.
293 posted on 08/11/2005 4:20:56 PM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82
I really think some of them are leftist plants trying to make us look bad.

I'm sorry for my inarticulateness, that is exactly what I am trying to say.

294 posted on 08/11/2005 4:21:53 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

You made sense to me...and you're right, a lot of people pretending to be conservatives aren't, including some on FR and most of the GOP.


295 posted on 08/11/2005 4:25:22 PM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

You mean people should be accountable for their actions?

Now that's a radical idea! :)

Red6


296 posted on 08/11/2005 4:26:24 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 7thOF7th

In this case, the newcomers have missed out on the critical examination of the idea that just because something involves drugs, or guns, none of the usual rules apply. Ultimately, officers are bound by the law, and the law does not allow the execution of ordinary citizens by the police. Even if he was red-handed guilty of everything charged to him, the police did not act lawfully and should be held to account as the violent criminals that they became.


297 posted on 08/11/2005 4:30:47 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Free Michael Graham!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

ping


298 posted on 08/11/2005 4:32:45 PM PDT by freepatriot32 (Deep within every dilemma is a solution that involves explosives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freepatriot32

Shooting him was excessive.

This is no excuse, but I think most PD's are not really that well trained for this. They "act" like studs but are amatures.

Red6


299 posted on 08/11/2005 4:33:08 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: middie
I would like to thank you for this post. I have lived in sunrise my entire life and never would have guessed the incompetency ran so deep. Do you happen to know of anyplace I could learn more about the local corruption?
300 posted on 08/11/2005 4:33:25 PM PDT by blackeagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 501-517 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson