Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

9/11 Commission's Staff Ignored Military's Early Identification of Chief Hijacker
NYTIMES ^ | 08/11/05 | DOUGLAS JEHL and PHILIP SHENON

Posted on 08/10/2005 9:13:33 PM PDT by Pikamax

9/11 Commission's Staff Ignored Military's Early Identification of Chief Hijacker By DOUGLAS JEHL and PHILIP SHENON

WASHINGTON, Aug. 10 - The Sept. 11 commission was warned by a uniformed military officer 10 days before issuing its final report that the account would be incomplete without reference to what he described as a secret military operation that by the summer of 2000 had identified as a potential threat the member of Al Qaeda who would lead the attacks more than a year later, commission officials said on Wednesday.

The officials said that the information had not been included in the report because aspects of the officer's account had sounded inconsistent with what the commission knew about that Qaeda member, Mohammed Atta, the plot's leader.

But aides to the Republican congressman who has sought to call attention to the military unit that conducted the secret operation said such a conclusion relied too much on specific dates involving Mr. Atta's travels and not nearly enough on the operation's broader determination that he was a threat.

The briefing by the military officer is the second known instance in which people on the commission's staff were told by members of the military team about the secret program, called Able Danger.

The meeting, on July 12, 2004, has not been previously disclosed. That it occurred, and that the officer identified Mr. Atta there, were acknowledged by officials of the commission after the congressman, Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania, provided information about it.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 911; 911coverup; abledanger; alqaeda; atta; bushhaters; clintonfailures; clintonlegacy; clintonscandals; coverup; dirtyrats; gorelick; jamiegorelick; jihadinamerica; lyingliars; reno; sept11; sleepercells; weldon; whitewash; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

1 posted on 08/10/2005 9:13:34 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

This is from the Times? Is their editor on vacation?


2 posted on 08/10/2005 9:16:35 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

It will run on page Z-30.


3 posted on 08/10/2005 9:19:25 PM PDT by skip_intro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
?....But aides to the Republican congressman who has sought to call attention to the military unit that conducted the secret operation said such a conclusion relied too much on specific dates involving Mr. Atta's travels and not nearly enough on the operation's broader determination that he was a threat. ?

Now that's very, very,.....illogical....

/intelligence?

4 posted on 08/10/2005 9:20:52 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys; prairiebreeze; onyx; Texasforever; CyberAnt; BigSkyFreeper; Tamzee; mrs tiggywinkle; ...

FYI Ping


5 posted on 08/10/2005 9:21:54 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Or maybe it's whitewash for the Plame thing.


6 posted on 08/10/2005 9:24:00 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maestro; Allan; Mitchell; TrebleRebel

"But aides to the Republican congressman who has sought to call attention to the military unit that conducted the secret operation said such a conclusion relied too much on specific dates involving Mr. Atta's travels and not nearly enough on the operation's broader determination that he was a threat."

So was it just the "Republican's" aides, or was it everybody's, and this is counter-spin directed to him.

typical NYTimes disinformation.

Of course, Atta's travels are of particular interest to Prague...


7 posted on 08/10/2005 9:25:12 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I'm sure they also ignored Laurie Mylroie's testimony.


8 posted on 08/10/2005 9:26:33 PM PDT by april15Bendovr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

"Mr. Felzenberg said staff investigators had become wary of the officer because he argued that Able Danger had identified Mr. Atta, an Egyptian, as having been in the United States in late 1999 or early 2000. The investigators knew this was impossible, Mr. Felzenberg said, since travel records confirmed that he had not entered the United States until June 2000."

Maybe he had a different passport? Doh!


9 posted on 08/10/2005 9:27:13 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

> This is from the Times? Is their editor on vacation?

Too big for them to ignore (unlike Air Enron).
But they will try to manage it.

Note the title:
"9/11 Commission's Staff Ignored ..."

Not the Commission. Their Staff.
Scapegoat time.

One Commissioner, Gorelick, of course, either already
knew, or pretended not to know when this came up.


10 posted on 08/10/2005 9:29:11 PM PDT by Boundless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
The primary objective of the 9/11 Commission was to ensure that no evidence pounted at Willie and, in fact, tended to demonstrate that Willie was pure as snow.

History will show that Bush's greatest blunder, the thing about which he was most stupid, was his failure to purge EVERY Clintonista and ensure that no Clintonista ever had a role in his administration. The dem scumbags on the 9/11 Commission had no interest in the facts or the truth, just in protecting Willie and, indirectly, Hillie.

11 posted on 08/10/2005 9:29:57 PM PDT by Tacis ("Democrats - The Party of Traitors, Treachery and Treason!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
....Of course, Atta's travels are of particular interest to Prague...

....bingo...Bingo....BINGO!

12 posted on 08/10/2005 9:33:54 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tacis

Had this been last minute info that "Rumsfeld and Bush knew!" the presses would have been stopped.


13 posted on 08/10/2005 9:34:03 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tacis

i could think of a few others, but i take your point.


14 posted on 08/10/2005 9:34:13 PM PDT by fantom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
I would love to know what documents Sandy Burger took, and I also wonder if Richard Clark is sweating just a little right now :-)
15 posted on 08/10/2005 9:37:18 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Boundless

Does anyone have an email address for Gorelick?

She must hear from the public on this.


16 posted on 08/10/2005 9:38:29 PM PDT by Carling (http://www.marriedadults.com/howarddeanscreamaudio141jq.mp3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

1964 - The Warren Commission
2004 - The 9/11 Commission


17 posted on 08/10/2005 9:39:16 PM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
History has a way of repeating itself :-)
18 posted on 08/10/2005 9:40:48 PM PDT by MJY1288 (Whenever a Liberal is Speaking on the Senate Floor, Al-Jazeera Breaks in and Covers it LIVE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I would love to know what documents Sandy Burger took, and I also wonder if Richard Clark is sweating just a little right now :-)

I want to know what documents he took and possibly replaced (with new ones) and which ones he shredded :0)

19 posted on 08/10/2005 9:40:56 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
1964 - The Warren Commission

2004 - The 9/11 Commission

well put!

20 posted on 08/10/2005 9:42:07 PM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson