Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Digging Deep for Proof of an Ancient Jewish Capital
NY Times ^ | August 5, 2005 | STEVEN ERLANGER

Posted on 08/05/2005 3:28:29 AM PDT by Pharmboy


Rina Castelnuovo for The New York Times
Eilat Mazar, an Israeli archaeologist, stood amid the ruins of a huge public building of the 10th century B.C. that she
believes may be the remains of King David's palace in a biblical Jewish capital.

JERUSALEM, Aug. 4 - An Israeli archaeologist says she has uncovered in East Jerusalem what may be the fabled palace of the biblical King David. Her work has been sponsored by a conservative Israeli research institute and financed by an American Jewish investment banker who would like to prove that Jerusalem was indeed the capital of the Jewish kingdom described in the Bible.

Other scholars are skeptical that the foundation walls discovered by the archaeologist, Eilat Mazar, are David's palace. But they acknowledge that what she has uncovered is rare and important: a major public building from around the 10th century B.C., with pottery shards that date to the time of David and Solomon and a government seal of an official mentioned in the book of Jeremiah.

The discovery is likely to be a new salvo in a major dispute in biblical archaeology: whether the kingdom of David was of some historical magnitude, or whether the kings were more like small tribal chieftains, reigning over another dusty hilltop.

The find will also be used in the broad political battle over Jerusalem - whether the Jews have their origins here and thus have some special hold on the place, or whether, as many Palestinians have said, including the late Yasir Arafat, the idea of a Jewish origin in Jerusalem is a myth used to justify conquest and occupation.

Hani Nur el-Din, a Palestinian professor of archaeology at Al Quds University, said he and his colleagues considered biblical archaeology an effort by Israelis "to fit historical evidence...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Israel; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: eilatmazar; godsgravesglyphs; hatzor; hazor; history; israel; jerusalem; kingdavid; letshavejerusalem; manfredbietak; telhatzor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: Pharmboy; blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; asp1; ...
Thanks Pharmboy.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

21 posted on 08/05/2005 8:26:52 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Amazon...

It was first printed in 1956. I keep it as a bathroom book, as it always fascinates! I am amazed at the lengths people go to to disprove the linkage of the Jews to their promised land.

22 posted on 08/05/2005 8:33:37 AM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch (Nobody ever has to defend a virtuous position)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc

Gary: thanks for the post--I will read the whole thing over the weekend. And have a great WE yourself...


23 posted on 08/05/2005 12:54:28 PM PDT by Pharmboy (There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Where does this NY Times writer think the Jews came from, Detroit?

No--that's where all the arabs are. LOL!

24 posted on 08/05/2005 12:55:45 PM PDT by Pharmboy (There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

What's GGG?


25 posted on 08/05/2005 1:16:55 PM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< OurFlorida.true.ws Impeach Judge Greer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ImaGraftedBranch
Other (Muslim) scholars are skeptical..
26 posted on 08/05/2005 1:27:17 PM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

Gods, Graves and Glyphs...


27 posted on 08/05/2005 4:23:20 PM PDT by Pharmboy (There is no positive correlation between the ability to write, act, sing or dance and being right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Serb5150

Refriedman ping.


28 posted on 08/05/2005 8:47:52 PM PDT by jwfiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; GarySpFc; Alouette; ImaGraftedBranch; Thommas; SunkenCiv; Yehuda; SJackson
Thanks to one and all for contributing to this thread.  Made for some very interesting reading.

But, I still do not understand the apparent dogfight over Jerusalem and Jewish origins.

The find will also be used in the broad political battle over Jerusalem - whether the Jews have their origins here and thus have some special hold on the place, or whether, as many Palestinians have said, including the late Yasir Arafat, the idea of a Jewish origin in Jerusalem is a myth used to justify conquest and occupation.

Apparently, I am not alone in my confusion.  Found the following comment on the article at PaleoJudaica.com, a weblog on ancient Judaism and its context.

. . . we have plenty of evidence that Jerusalem was inhabited by Hebrew-speaking Judeans during the Iron Age II, especially the last century or so of it (e.g., references to biblical kings in the Assyrian and Babylonian inscriptions, the Hezekiah's tunnel inscription, the Siloam tomb inscription, the Ophel ostracon, etc.). There is legitimate debate about the nature of David's and Solomon's supposed empires and how reliable the biblical sources are for the Iron Age II, but that is another issue and should not be conflated with the frequently bizarre claims of the Palestinians. I don't know exactly what "origins" means here and I don't want to get into the endlessly debatable topic of the political implications of what we do know about Iron Age-II Jerusalem.

The blogger is James "Jim" Davila, a lecturer in early Jewish studies at St. Mary's College, University of Fife, Scotland.  If he's uncertain what is being claimed about origins, then I'm in fair company.

From the Jewish Virtual Library:

Ever since King David made Jerusalem the capital of Israel 3,000 years ago, the city has played a central role in Jewish existence. . . . By contrast, Jerusalem was never the capital of any Arab entity. In fact, it was a backwater for most of Arab history. Jerusalem never served as a provincial capital under Muslim rule nor was it ever a Muslim cultural center. For Jews, the entire city is sacred, but Muslims revere a site — the Dome of the Rock — not the city. "To a Muslim," observed British writer Christopher Sykes, "there is a profound difference between Jerusalem and Mecca or Medina. The latter are holy places containing holy sites." Besides the Dome of the Rock, he noted, Jerusalem has no major Islamic significance . . . Meanwhile, Jews have been living in Jerusalem continuously for nearly two millennia.

Nothing here to dispel the confusion inflicted by Erlanger's article.

Not surprising to me, the confusion is dispelled by Daniel Pipes in The Muslim Claim to Jerusalem published in The Middle East Quarterly.

"As during the era of the Crusaders," Lazarus-Yafeh points out, Muslim leaders "began again to emphasize the sanctity of Jerusalem in Islamic tradition." In the process, they even relied on some of the same arguments (e.g., rejecting the occupying power's religious connections to the city) and some of the same hadiths to back up those allegations. Muslims began echoing the Jewish devotion to Jerusalem: Arafat declared that "Al-Quds is in the innermost of our feeling, the feeling of our people and the feeling of all Arabs, Muslims, and Christians in the world."  Extravagant statements became the norm (Jerusalem was now said to be "comparable in holiness" to Mecca and Medina; or even "our most sacred place").

According to Pipes, these are the Muslim claims concerning Jerusalem:


29 posted on 08/06/2005 1:00:28 AM PDT by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
"The Bible as History - Archeology confirms the Book of Books."

by Werner Keller

Translated from the German by William Neil, D.D.

Published by Hodder and Stoughton, St.Pauls House, Warwick Lane, London. E.C.4.

First Published 1956
Fourteenth Impression 1969

(It is an excellent book. The chapter about manna in the Sinai is very interesting. I have had it in my library for more than four years.)
30 posted on 08/06/2005 1:52:31 AM PDT by Supercomputer One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

King David was real. The First Temple existed. The Second Temple existed. The Third Temple will be built. Prophecy is real. There is most certainly a divine dimension to the universe.


31 posted on 08/06/2005 1:54:09 AM PDT by Supercomputer One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: tutstar

"GGG" is the acronym for the Governor General of Gabon.


32 posted on 08/06/2005 1:56:07 AM PDT by Supercomputer One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Supercomputer One

That's where we got the idea. ;')


33 posted on 08/06/2005 3:25:09 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse

Like mosques all over, the Dome of the Rock is an imperialist symbol, showing the disdain for the holy places of other faiths. That was the only reason for its construction. It should be destroyed, along with Islam itself. Luckily for us, Moslems are themselves the agency of Islam's destruction. Hence the urgency behind those many calls for jihad outside Islamic countries.


34 posted on 08/06/2005 3:36:13 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tutstar
We've spent a lot of time in ancient Rome this week, but there was plenty of other stuff. Here's the weekly Gods Graves Glyphs ping list digest link:
Gods Graves Glyphs Digest #55 20050806
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

35 posted on 08/06/2005 4:44:40 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Like mosques all over, the Dome of the Rock is an imperialist symbol, showing the disdain for the holy places of other faiths. That was the only reason for its construction. It should be destroyed, along with Islam itself. Luckily for us, Moslems are themselves the agency of Islam's destruction. Hence the urgency behind those many calls for jihad outside Islamic countries.

You are correct about the mosque being an imperialist symbol. The Western Gate, AKA The Golden Gate, is on the west side of the Dome of the Rock. The Muslims knew Jesus is supposed to return through the gate, and so they walled it up, and built a cemetery on the outside to keep Him from returning. :)

In the link below you will find two pictures of the Dome of the Rock. One shows the rock on the inside. You will note the white spot in the lower left corner. The Jews would sacrifice thousands of animals in the First and Second Temple periods on the rock, and the white spot is a hole leading into a room below the rock. The blood would drain into the room, and at one time it supposedly drained all the way into the Kidron Valley to the West.
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/sacredplaces/domeofrock.html
36 posted on 08/06/2005 6:39:12 AM PDT by GarySpFc (Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc; Berosus

Thanks, Gary, for the link. Here it is again, Berosus:

http://witcombe.sbc.edu/sacredplaces/domeofrock.html


37 posted on 08/06/2005 1:54:02 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
The find will also be used in the broad political battle over Jerusalem - whether the Jews have their origins here and thus have some special hold on the place, or whether, as many Palestinians have said, including the late Yasir Arafat, the idea of a Jewish origin in Jerusalem is a myth used to justify conquest and occupation.

When exactly did this become a "political battle"? Or controversial in any way?
Until relatively recently, there was an automatic and unquestioned connection between Jerusalem, Judaism and Christianity. And so it had been for millenia.

On the other hand, can we have some input as to when the "al Quds" propaganda began? What is the earliest mention of it?

Take your time, Nur el-Din...

38 posted on 08/06/2005 2:05:01 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Judea: See Palestine

PALESTINE, A part of Asiatic Turky, situated between thirty-sis and thirty-eight degrees of east longitude, and between thirty-one and thirty-four degrees of north latitude: it is bounded by Mt Libanus, which divides it from Syria, on the north; by Mt. Hermon, which separates it from Arabia Deseta, on the east; by the mountains of Seir and the deserts of Arabia Petraea, on the south; and by the Mediterranean Sea on the west.
It was called Palestine, from the Philistines who inhabited the sea coasts. It was also called Judea, from Judah; and the Holy Land, from our Saviour's residence and sufferings in it; and it is called Canaan and the Promised Land by the Scriptures.
It is 150 miles in length, and 80 in breadth; and in the time of solomon it seems to have extended from the Mediterranean Sea to the river Euphrates. --- Encyclopedia Britannica, Vol III, 1772

39 posted on 08/06/2005 2:31:38 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

BUMP!


40 posted on 08/06/2005 3:34:08 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson