Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court is simply a mirror of nation's politics
Heraldnet ^ | 7/27/05 | James Klurfeld

Posted on 07/28/2005 2:46:04 PM PDT by qam1

Start with this reality: In the 10 presidential elections dating back to 1968, the Republican candidate has won seven times. If you want to understand why Judge John G. Roberts will be approved by the U.S. Senate, you can stop right there.

Contrary to popular perception, the U.S. Supreme Court is not above politics. It follows politics. And in the past 36 years, the nation has moved to the right. It hasn't been in a straight line, but this nation is significantly more conservative today than it was in 1968. The court's makeup is just following that trend - as it should in a democracy.

Frankly, this is a painful reality for me to accept. I came of age in the 1960s, a card-carrying member of the baby boom generation (OK, just barely, born May 15, 1945), and having lived my life in the Northeast, I assumed that my moderate to liberal tendencies reflected the majority view in the country. The opposition to the Vietnam War, the civil-rights marches, the socially liberal (as in sex, drugs and rock 'n' roll) slant of my crowd surely represented the overwhelming view of my compatriots.

Wrong.

As it turns out, I am a representative of a minority group - a fairly large minority, but still a minority. Most of my presidential candidates have lost, and the issues that matter most to me and like-minded friends aren't necessarily reflected by opinion polls. We thought the anti-war movement was a great thing and that the march for equality for black Americans, including affirmative action, was a noble cause. I still believe we were right on our principles then and are right now, but a good portion of our generation didn't agree.........

(Excerpt) Read more at heraldnet.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: aginghippie
I would be nice if all Liberals realized this..

Or the Republicans in the Senate realized it and grew a freakin' spine

1 posted on 07/28/2005 2:46:05 PM PDT by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: qam1
...the march for equality for black Americans, including affirmative action, was a noble cause.

There's his problem right there. When "equality" turned into racial preference programs, most Americans intuitively understood that was wrong (MLK would have been horrified, I'm sure).

2 posted on 07/28/2005 2:53:21 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Mohammad spent more than half his life killing infidels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1
It almost sounds like this guy gets it. But he doesn't:

We thought the anti-war movement was a great thing and that the march for equality for black Americans, including affirmative action, was a noble cause. I still believe we were right on our principles then and are right now, but a good portion of our generation didn't agree

The message:
Republicans do not want equality for blacks. Conservatives see blacks as second-class citizens. Only Liberals are noble enough to see that blacks are humans too.

3 posted on 07/28/2005 2:54:38 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

The reason the Democrats are in the minority today is because his little cadre of hippies drove middle America away from them.


4 posted on 07/28/2005 3:31:57 PM PDT by AzaleaCity5691 (The enemy lies in the heart of Gadsden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1
Supreme Court is simply a mirror of nation's politics

Wishful thinking by the losers.

The Congress is a mirror of the nation's politics. The Supreme Court is a mirror of the nation's (self-declared) elite.

ML/NJ

5 posted on 07/28/2005 3:46:09 PM PDT by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Amazing. He almost gets it. At least he is honest.


6 posted on 07/28/2005 3:51:51 PM PDT by pollyannaish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1



Only if the nation is...*France*.


7 posted on 07/28/2005 4:05:37 PM PDT by NickatNite2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1
"...this nation is significantly more conservative today than it was in 1968."

You could have fooled me. Immorality abounds, millions of babies dead, God being removed from the public square, terrorists are defended, illegal aliens are given health care, college educations and house loans courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer, our system of government is teetering on the brink of collapse as it is overtaken by corrupt, unelected judges.

All this new conservatism is killing me.
8 posted on 07/28/2005 4:35:22 PM PDT by Jeff Blogworthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Blogworthy

This guy obviously wasn't old enough to know
how it was in '68..or he was stoned off his
ass back then.


9 posted on 07/28/2005 5:17:40 PM PDT by NickatNite2003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: qam1

"I came of age in the 1960s"

The age of "flower power" and Hildebeast !


10 posted on 07/28/2005 7:20:14 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

"It almost sounds like this guy gets it. But he doesn't"

What else would you expect from a newspaper that is owned by the Washington Post?


11 posted on 07/28/2005 7:21:49 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson