Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nanocell's double hit on cancer
BBC ^ | 7/27/05

Posted on 07/28/2005 12:43:40 PM PDT by LibWhacker

A nanocell that can burrow into a tumour, cut off its blood supply and detonate a lethal dose of anti-cancer toxins has been developed.

The double-action therapy, which comes packed in a tiny double chamber, leaves healthy cells unscathed.

It has proved safe and effective against melanoma and a form of lung cancer in mice.

Details of the technique, developed at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, are published in Nature.

The technique combines two methods of combating cancer - poisoning tumour cells and cutting off the blood supply to the tumour.

Previously, the dual strategy has proved difficult as chemotherapy could not be delivered to tumours if the supply line - the blood vessels - had been cut.

Also, the drugs required are delivered on different schedules - blood vessel-destroying anti-angiogenics over a prolonged period, and chemotherapy in cycles.

Double balloon

The MIT team tackled the problem by creating a structure for the nanocell that resembled a balloon within a balloon.

The researchers loaded the outer membrane of the nanocell with an anti-angiogenic drug and the inner balloon with chemotherapy agents.

They also created a surface chemistry which allowed the nanocell to evade detection by the immune system.

The nanocell was made small enough to pass through tumour vessels, but too large for the pores of normal vessels.

Once inside the tumour, the nanocell's outer membrane disintegrates, rapidly deploying the anti-angiogenic drug.

The blood vessels feeding the tumor then collapse, trapping the loaded nanoparticle in the tumor, where it slowly releases the chemotherapy.

Tests in mice showed the nanocell shrank the tumour, stopped angiogenesis (new vessel growth) and avoided damage to surrounding healthy tissue much more effectively than other cancer treatments.

Eight out of 10 mice treated with the nanocells survived for more than 65 days.

Mice treated with the best current therapy survived for just 30 days, while untreated animals died at 20 days.

The nanocell worked better against melanoma than lung cancer - indicating the need to tweak the design for different cancers.

Elegant system

Lead researcher Professor Ram Sasisekharan said: "This model enables us to rationally and systematically evaluate drug combinations and loading mechanisms.

"It's not going to stop here. We want to build on this concept."

Dr Judah Folkman, of Children's Hospital Boston, said: "It's an elegant technique for attacking the two compartments of a tumor, its vascular system and the cancer cells."

Henry Scowcroft, of Cancer Research UK, said: "This is a fascinating approach to cancer therapy that seems to be paying off in animal models of the disease.

"The idea of using nanoparticles as a sort of therapeutic 'Trojan horse', attacking the cancer cell by stealth from within, is entirely new.

"Although this concept is only starting out on the long road to becoming a treatment for cancer patients, these preliminary results look very promising indeed."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: angiogenics; antiangiogenics; balloon; blood; cancer; cary; chemotherapy; horse; immune; lung; melanoma; nanocell; nanotech; nanotechnology; supply; system; trojan; vessels; zaq

1 posted on 07/28/2005 12:43:42 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Interesting! You also might like this:

"Harmless Virus May Kill Cancer Cells"
http://my.webmd.com/content/article/107/108675.htm


2 posted on 07/28/2005 12:46:49 PM PDT by Stellar Dendrite (islamofascism, like socialism must be eradicated from the face of this earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

BTTT

Something useful to come out of Massachusetts.


3 posted on 07/28/2005 12:47:23 PM PDT by Alexander Rubin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alexander Rubin
"Something useful to come out of Massachusetts."

In more than 225 years that is*.

*excluding my Dad & His family from Pittsfield in the Berkshire Mountains.

4 posted on 07/28/2005 12:52:51 PM PDT by ExcursionGuy84 ("I will Declare the Beauty of The LORD.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite

I did like it, thanks! I think mankind is going to be finished with cancer in the next 20 or 30 years.


5 posted on 07/28/2005 12:52:59 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite
IMHO, virus' could be used for gene therapy, too. As well as targeted attacks on cancer, etc.

Seems like you could use them to transport genetic material of your choice.
6 posted on 07/28/2005 12:56:45 PM PDT by dhs12345 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dhs12345

This whole genre of medicine and the folks who invent it just absolutely continue to amaze me. What dedication they have and God bless them all. Wow !!!!!


7 posted on 07/28/2005 1:08:28 PM PDT by geezerwheezer (get up boys, we're burnin' daylight!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

BUMP FOR MY BROTHER


8 posted on 07/28/2005 1:30:03 PM PDT by texas_mrs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Thanks for the article.

I certainly am happy that progress is being made in cancer research. My father passed last Saturday from cancer that began in his trachea. I don't wish that experience on anyone.

Jerry


9 posted on 07/28/2005 1:37:53 PM PDT by sixgunjer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sixgunjer

I am so sorry about your father.


10 posted on 07/28/2005 1:43:29 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
This is fascinating!! Thanks for posting the info.

Cancer is such a terrible disease. Back in the late '90s our former pastor and his wife were both diagnosed with Leukemia within 10 months of each other. She was buried in '98; his treatment was successful and he's now in remission.

11 posted on 07/28/2005 1:55:22 PM PDT by ken in texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

Thanks so much. He passed peacefully, but anyone who has been through this experience would soon wish there to be a cure for this disease. Even before my Dad was diagnosed, I was always pleased to hear about breakthroughs in research.

I kind of liken cancer research to the discovery of flight. Once the basic hurdles have been overcome, I think advances and treatments will come at a logarithmic pace.

Thanks again for the article and your sympathies.

Jerry


12 posted on 07/28/2005 2:13:54 PM PDT by sixgunjer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sixgunjer

Sorry


13 posted on 07/28/2005 2:28:27 PM PDT by KansasConservative1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

read later bump


14 posted on 07/28/2005 4:42:45 PM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

If the gov't is going to fund research, they should put more money into this instead of stem cell research.


15 posted on 07/28/2005 6:14:33 PM PDT by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson