Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FINAL CAFTA VOTE ROLL CALL - How did your Congressman Vote?
CongressionalRecord ^

Posted on 07/28/2005 8:13:58 AM PDT by Happy2BMe

FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 443
(Republicans in roman; Democrats in italic; Independents underlined)

      H R 3045      RECORDED VOTE      28-Jul-2005      12:03 AM
      QUESTION:  On Passage
      BILL TITLE: Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act

Ayes Noes PRES NV
Republican 202 27   2
Democratic 15 187    
Independent   1    
TOTALS 217 215   2


---- AYES    217 ---

Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Bachus
Baker
Barrett (SC)
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Bass
Bean
Beauprez
Biggert
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blunt
Boehlert
Boehner
Bonilla
Bonner
Bono
Boozman
Bradley (NH)
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Buyer
Calvert
Camp
Cannon
Cantor
Carter
Castle
Chabot
Chocola
Cole (OK)
Conaway
Cooper
Cox
Crenshaw
Cuellar
Culberson
Cunningham
Davis (KY)
Davis, Tom
Deal (GA)
DeLay
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Dicks
Doolittle
Drake
Dreier
Duncan
Ehlers
Emerson
English (PA)
Everett
Feeney
Ferguson
Fitzpatrick (PA)
Flake
Foley
Forbes
Fortenberry
Fossella
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Gerlach
Gibbons
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gingrey
Gohmert
Goodlatte
Granger
Graves
Green (WI)
Hall
Harris
Hart
Hastert
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Hayworth
Hefley
Hensarling
Herger
Hinojosa
Hobson
Hoekstra
Hulshof
Hyde
Inglis (SC)
Issa
Istook
Jefferson
Jenkins
Johnson (CT)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Keller
Kelly
Kennedy (MN)
King (IA)
King (NY)
Kingston
Kirk
Kline
Knollenberg
Kolbe
Kuhl (NY)
LaHood
Latham
LaTourette
Leach
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Linder
Lucas
Lungren, Daniel E.
Manzullo
Marchant
Matheson
McCaul (TX)
McCrery
McKeon
McMorris
Meeks (NY)
Mica
Miller (FL)
Miller, Gary
Moore (KS)
Moran (KS)
Moran (VA)
Murphy
Musgrave
Myrick
Neugebauer
Northup
Nunes
Nussle
Ortiz
Osborne
Oxley
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (PA)
Petri
Pickering
Pitts
Platts
Poe
Pombo
Porter
Price (GA)
Pryce (OH)
Putnam
Radanovich
Ramstad
Regula
Reichert
Renzi
Reynolds
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Royce
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Saxton
Schwarz (MI)
Sensenbrenner
Sessions
Shadegg
Shaw
Shays
Sherwood
Shimkus
Shuster
Skelton
Smith (TX)
Snyder
Sodrel
Souder
Stearns
Sullivan
Sweeney
Tanner
Terry
Thomas
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Towns
Turner
Upton
Walden (OR)
Walsh
Wamp
Weldon (FL)
Weldon (PA)
Weller
Westmoreland
Whitfield
Wicker
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
Young (AK)
Young (FL)

---- NOES    215 ---

Abercrombie
Ackerman
Allen
Andrews
Baca
Baird
Baldwin
Barrow
Becerra
Berkley
Berman
Berry
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blumenauer
Boren
Boswell
Boucher
Boustany
Boyd
Brady (PA)
Brown (OH)
Brown, Corrine
Butterfield
Capito
Capps
Capuano
Cardin
Cardoza
Carnahan
Carson
Case
Chandler
Clay
Cleaver
Clyburn
Coble
Conyers
Costa
Costello
Cramer
Crowley
Cubin
Cummings
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
Davis (TN)
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Edwards
Emanuel
Engel
Eshoo
Etheridge
Evans
Farr
Fattah
Filner
Ford
Foxx
Frank (MA)
Garrett (NJ)
Gonzalez
Goode
Gordon
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Gutknecht
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Herseth
Higgins
Hinchey
Holden
Holt
Honda
Hooley
Hostettler
Hoyer
Hunter
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jindal
Johnson, E. B.
Jones (NC)
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kennedy (RI)
Kildee
Kilpatrick (MI)
Kind
Kucinich
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Lee
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lofgren, Zoe
Lowey
Lynch
Mack
Maloney
Markey
Marshall
Matsui
McCarthy
McCollum (MN)
McCotter
McDermott
McGovern
McHenry
McHugh
McIntyre
McKinney
McNulty
Meehan
Meek (FL)
Melancon
Menendez
Michaud
Millender-McDonald
Miller (MI)
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore (WI)
Murtha
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Ney
Norwood
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Otter
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Paul
Payne
Pelosi
Peterson (MN)
Pomeroy
Price (NC)
Rahall
Rangel
Rehberg
Reyes
Ross
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Ruppersberger
Rush
Ryan (OH)
Sabo
Salazar
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Sanders
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schwartz (PA)
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Serrano
Sherman
Simmons
Simpson
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Smith (WA)
Solis
Spratt
Stark
Strickland
Stupak
Tancredo
Tauscher
Taylor (MS)
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Visclosky
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watson
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Wexler
Woolsey
Wu
Wynn

---- NOT VOTING    2 ---

Davis, Jo Ann
Taylor (NC)




TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; cafta; prostitutes; rollcall; whores
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341 next last
To: Dazedcat

Because we are able to concetrate better on the industries and services that we provide, while being able to purchase raw materials and manufactured goods more cheaply...it is win-win baby.


61 posted on 07/28/2005 8:40:23 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Syds Dad
Free trade only works if ITS FAIR TRADE. The current US trade deficit with China comes to mind. Any trade agreement that costs thousands of middle class US jobs (NAFTA, GATT) can't be good for the well being and strength of this country. Clinton claimed the NAFTA GATT agreements created US jobs. In all accounts he's right but from what I've read many who lost good paying jobs now have to work two or three lower paying jobs to maintain their standard of living. Is that really job creation? The same will undoubtedly hold true for CAFCA.
62 posted on 07/28/2005 8:41:13 AM PDT by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Thanks, neighbor.

When the votes are rilly close, THAT's when these yo-yoes show the skull and crossbones--their true colors of their hearts.

63 posted on 07/28/2005 8:41:21 AM PDT by tailgunner (US freeholders are ALL squatters now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo

ROTF....


64 posted on 07/28/2005 8:41:34 AM PDT by international american (Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

"It really comes down to this:

Capitalists and free traders see no limit to the power of markets and wealth...

Protectionists think there is a limited amount of wealth to be created (almost a communistic way of lokking at the world economy)."


Agree completely. Most protectionists I come across are unmotivated and uninspired people. Like the 70 year old man who curses out computers and the internet and refuses to learn it.


65 posted on 07/28/2005 8:42:44 AM PDT by Syds Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

did anyone from our state vote against?


66 posted on 07/28/2005 8:43:46 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tulane
Wake up. The Constitution states that it is the supreme law of the land.

By signing on to CAFTA, we have made CAFTA regulations superior to the regulations Congress comes up with. Hence CAFTA has been made superior to the Constitution. This is already going on with NAFTA. And the WTO.

The Constitution also says that Congress shall regulate trade, no one else. Not even a CAFTA tribunal.

Have even thought who will be implementing CAFTA regulations? Not anyboday you will be able to control.
67 posted on 07/28/2005 8:44:10 AM PDT by w6ai5q37b (There's no such thing as "free trade." Nothing in life is free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Syds Dad

I am proud of the guys that got this done...though CAFTA is only a very small trade agreement, it bodes well for the future. Just my $.02.

Kudos to the Dems who crossed over (we spend enogh time bashing them, might as well through them a bone when they actually get it right).


68 posted on 07/28/2005 8:45:31 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

" In all accounts he's right but from what I've read many who lost good paying jobs now have to work two or three lower paying jobs to maintain their standard of living."


I hear this garbage all the time. It's a wonder I never run into these people.

Everybody I know is living light years better than they were 10 years ago, and it's not even close.

Learn new skills, find a new job. There's tons of high paying jobs out there if you have the motivation and initiative to find them. People who refuse to adjust are going to suffer, that's not my problem that they chose to go down that road. I'll continue to thrive.


69 posted on 07/28/2005 8:45:38 AM PDT by Syds Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: tailgunner
The last fifteen minutes of the vote were the most telling to me.

Many fortunes were made in the last five.

Millions and millions of dollars in campaign monies were made along with hundreds of multi-million dollar projects for various congressional districts.

In short: The vote was bought and America will pay the price.

70 posted on 07/28/2005 8:46:08 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Syds Dad
Wake up Jebediah. It's no longer the 1800s. The Pony Express doesn't exist anymore.

And thanks to people like you, neither does the United States exist anymore either. Back in Jedediah's day, you'd be branded as a traitor.
71 posted on 07/28/2005 8:46:31 AM PDT by w6ai5q37b (There's no such thing as "free trade." Nothing in life is free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
"..I'm leaning towards concluding that CAFTA is a bad thing."

I look to NAFTA as evidence how this new agreement will be a setback in sectors of our economic expansion. DuPont had a polyesters plant near my hometown and as soon as NAFTA was passed, they began "downsizing" and offering early retirements. Many employees stayed on because they simply didn't have the years to qualify. DuPont "sold" the operation to a Mexican outfit (because as allowable under NAFTA, Mexico requires their nationals maintain controlling shares of businesses) and moved all the process equipment to Mexico.

In US beef sales, think of it this way - there are a limited number of metric tons of beef to be sold on the "world market" in excess of what US consumers purchase. When those other markets "open" and can only afford a break even price for the product, that open market will have the US and foreign consumers competing for US beef and who will end up paying more? US consumers because distributors will realize they can make up more than the difference from Americans and they'll view that difference as increased profits. Unless there is an adequate producer increase to keep up with both domestic and foreign demand which would help keep prices low, watch and see what happens. $8-12 lb for "high quality" beef will be commonplace.

72 posted on 07/28/2005 8:46:59 AM PDT by azhenfud (This tagline is currently experiencing technical difficulties. Please stand by.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: w6ai5q37b

Really?

I suppose any treat we sign then becomes the Supreme law of the land...Was NATO unconstitutional?

Does the constitution not give the executive branch the right to make treaties? You might want to read it, Justice Calegero.


73 posted on 07/28/2005 8:47:03 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

CO was a split. Musgrave and BeaupreZ- Aye, Tancredo and Salazar- Not


74 posted on 07/28/2005 8:47:23 AM PDT by conservativebabe (Down with Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud

If NAFTA was bad, why has the economy expanded at a rate of 4% per year since we signed it?


75 posted on 07/28/2005 8:47:52 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0

Candice miller. No to CAFTA and strong on border control.


76 posted on 07/28/2005 8:47:53 AM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: w6ai5q37b

99% of everyone on this thread is totally oblivious to the political cost of CAFTA that you alluded to in #67.


77 posted on 07/28/2005 8:48:29 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

Case in point.. Visit your average trailer park.

My wife's a case worker and sees them all the time. They are filled with DirecTV satellites, DVD Players, Big Screen TV's, and empty beer cans littered on the floor.


Yes, the standard of living in the United States is just plummeting.


78 posted on 07/28/2005 8:48:36 AM PDT by Syds Dad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: shield

""The choice was CAFTA or give Central America to China."

That is about as true as we need 40 million illiterate uneducated illegals to pick fruit.

I just returned from China. I do business there every year. China wants OUR a$$, not a bunch of peasants from Central America.


79 posted on 07/28/2005 8:49:24 AM PDT by international american (Tagline now flameproof....purchased from "Conspiracy Guy Custom Taglines"LLC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Syds Dad
Capitalism, Freedom and Free trade works everytime it's tried.

I was really hoping that you left off the /sarcasm tag on your previous post.

I'm sure you also think the NAFTA treaty sellout has also been a roaring success for America.

Why, in your opinion, do you think CAFTA will be good for America. Please realize that I do not give two shits about the rest of the world's economies, I just want to know how this latest socialistic crap is going to benefit us.

Thank you in advance.

80 posted on 07/28/2005 8:49:37 AM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (UR 0wN3D: USSC-2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson