Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Backs Scouts' Use of Military Bases
Associated Press ^ | July 26, 2005 | LIZ SIDOTI

Posted on 07/26/2005 1:12:52 PM PDT by RWR8189

WASHINGTON - The Senate voted Tuesday to allow U.S. military bases to continue to host Boy Scouts events, responding to lawsuits and a federal court ruling aimed at severing relationships between the government and the youth group.

The vote came one day after four adult Scout leaders were killed on the opening day of the National Scout Jamboree at the Army's Fort A.P. Hill in Bowling Green, Va., when a tent pole apparently struck a power line.

In a 98-0 vote, the Senate approved the provision continuing the hosting of Boy Scout events as part of massive bill setting Defense Department policy for next year.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., a former Boy Scout who sponsored the Senate provision, said it is necessary to push back on a spate of lawsuits to limit Boy Scout activities on government property. The provision adopted Tuesday says Boy Scouts should be treated the same as other national youth organizations

Frist said it "removes any doubt that federal agencies may welcome Scouts to hold meetings, go camping on federal property or hold scouting events and public forums" on government property.

In 1999, the ACLU of Illinois filed a lawsuit claiming the Pentagon's sponsorship of such Boy Scout activities violates the First Amendment. The ACLU argues that direct government sponsorship of the group amounts to discrimination.

Civil liberties advocates have assailed the Boy Scouts organization because it bans openly gay leaders and compels members to swear an oath of duty to God.

On June 22, U.S. District Judge Blanche Manning ruled in the ACLU's favor, saying the Pentagon can't spend millions of dollars to sponsor Boy Scout events. She said in an earlier ruling that the government spent between $6 million and $8 million to host the Jamboree on a military base in 1997 and 2001.

The House in November overwhelmingly passed a nonbinding resolution that recognized the Boy Scouts organization for its public service efforts and condemned legal efforts to limit government ties to the organization that has 3.2 million members.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; aclu; aclue; boyscouts; bsa; culturewars; dod; fortaphill; frist; homosexualagenda; jamboree; military; militarybases; s642; scouting; scouts; supportourscouts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 07/26/2005 1:12:56 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Everyone just has to stop catering to ACLU, an organization who has an agenda against any program that emphasizes good character. ACLU is also pro pedophilia.
2 posted on 07/26/2005 1:15:39 PM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
There'll be gnashing of teeth tonight in RAT holes across America!
3 posted on 07/26/2005 1:17:31 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Excellent news, thanks!


4 posted on 07/26/2005 1:18:50 PM PDT by Da Mav
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

Hopefully W's Supreme Court picks will change the legal environment for the better--the Supremes will no longer rubber stamp any case the ACLU brings before it.


5 posted on 07/26/2005 1:19:43 PM PDT by RightWingConspirator (Glad that Ted the Boorish Drunk, Hitlery the Witch and John Fonda/Fraud Kerry are not my senators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

A lib co-worker of mine told me today that while the Scouts do a lot of great things, he is in total disagreement with them not allowing homosexuals into Scouting; he also doesn't like the fact that Federal tax dollars go to Scouting (I'm assuming he is referring to the use of federal land), since they disallow homosexuals. Of course, as soon as I mentioned that there were MANY organizations that I felt should not benefit from my Federal tax dollars, he told me I was trying to cloud the issue. Why is it that libs can only debate as far as when they are winning, yet when a conservative proves them wrong, they get bent out of shape?


6 posted on 07/26/2005 1:22:35 PM PDT by Born Conservative ("If not us, who? And if not now, when? - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dante3

Awesome.
And I don't use that word lightly.


7 posted on 07/26/2005 1:23:23 PM PDT by cyclotic (Cub Scouts-Teach 'em young to be men, and politically incorrect in the process)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

98-0.

Even liberal Democrats won't touch the BSA.

Popcorn anyone?


8 posted on 07/26/2005 1:25:00 PM PDT by zencat (The universe is not what it appears, nor is it something else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zencat

Anyone know who the two senators not voting were?


9 posted on 07/26/2005 1:31:25 PM PDT by Kenny500c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: zencat
Who were the two 'dissenting' votes or 'absentees'?
10 posted on 07/26/2005 1:33:10 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kenny500c

Im going to guess, Mosley Braun and Kennedy.


11 posted on 07/26/2005 1:33:38 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jay777

Ping!


12 posted on 07/26/2005 1:35:07 PM PDT by EdReform (Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks; little jeremiah; Grampa Dave; MeekOneGOP; OXENinFLA

Ping


13 posted on 07/26/2005 1:37:42 PM PDT by EdReform (Free Republic - helping to keep our country a free republic. Thank you for your financial support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

By ACLU logic, isn't the charitable deduction for churches/synagogues/mosques a violation of the 1st?


14 posted on 07/26/2005 1:41:07 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

I thought Mosely-Braun was voted out of office years ago.


15 posted on 07/26/2005 1:44:44 PM PDT by Kenny500c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Husker24

Ex-Senator Moseley-Braun's seat is currently occupied by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL), and has been since 2000, I think.


16 posted on 07/26/2005 1:47:31 PM PDT by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
A lib co-worker of mine told me today that while the Scouts do a lot of great things, he is in total disagreement with them not allowing homosexuals into Scouting;

I wonder it this Lib even knows the BSA position on homosexuals. For one, it never mentions homosexuality in its applications for membership or leadership. It says if you have anything in your past that would make you a bad role model for young men you should voluntarily withdraw your application. I suspect even most Libs would agree that homosexuality is not a good role model, or that other bad role models would also make for bad leadership. Wife beating and criminals come to mind.

Thus leaders should be good role models. Now as to the youth, clearly the scouts would not benefit from young active and openly homosexual scouts in their midst. But what about the young man who is not certain about his sexuality and keeps it to himself? Well guess what, Scouting does not ask him to leave, in fact scouting does not ask young men anything about their sexuality. (They do expect a belief in a Supreme Being, but are willing to bend this belief until it almost breaks to let in a kid. Scouts do not need to belong to a recognized religion, and the Supreme Being can be the G-d of nature or earth, or all of life as long as spirituality is involved.)

I end with a story about a troop in the South SF Bay Area who stated firmly that they were against the Scouts policy on not allowing openly homosexual scoutleaders. The Scouts did not move agains them for this position. Waiting to see if they would follow up their position with action. An openly homosexual man from San Francisco (about an hours drive north) applied for a job with this troop. Well, the troop committee got together and decided that they had no openings for new Assistant Scoutmasters at this time. LOL. Common sense prevailed again. (BTW, it is in this troop committed where the leadership credentials of prospective leaders is evaluated. I participated in one that denied a recently turned adult scout a position of leadership on the grounds that he had not demonstrated sufficient maturity to this point. He was asked to resubmit his application at some time in the future.

Ask your Lib friend where common sense enters his political philosophy?

17 posted on 07/26/2005 1:50:55 PM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Will the ACLU receive federal funds to challenge the constitutionality of this bill?
The ACLU operates on federal funds in all these attacks on the Scouts and Christianity.


18 posted on 07/26/2005 1:54:11 PM PDT by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Who were the 2 socialist that didn't vote?


19 posted on 07/26/2005 2:18:36 PM PDT by GailA (Glory be to GOD and his only son Jesus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Why is it that libs can only debate as far as when they are winning, yet when a conservative proves them wrong, they get bent out of shape?

Liberals worked hard, and have fairly earned the right to be bent out of shape.

They've earned it by being wrong on EVERY major issue, both domestic and foreign, for more than 50 years.

20 posted on 07/26/2005 2:31:36 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson