Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shooting victim had expired visa
BBC News ^ | July 25, 2005 | Staff

Posted on 07/25/2005 5:07:52 AM PDT by MadIvan

The Brazilian man shot dead by police in south London, who mistook him for a suicide bomber, had been in Britain on an out-of-date visa, officials say.

Jean Charles de Menezes, 27, may have run from police because of his visa situation, BBC correspondents say.

The electrician had come to the UK on a student visa, which allows people to work for a small number of hours.

Relatives of Mr Menezes are considering suing over the Stockwell Tube shooting, saying police will have "to pay".

Meanwhile, detectives are still hunting for the men who attempted to blow up three London Tube trains and a bus last Thursday.

Three men have been arrested so far, but it is thought the four would-be bombers are still free and may have access to explosives.

Meanwhile, Chris Fox, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers, gave his support to the Metropolitan Police's "shoot-to-kill" policy with potential suicide bombers, in the wake of Friday's shooting of Mr Menezes.

"Shoot-to-kill is very good headline but, in fact, what we have to do is have a series of tactics which range from disruption to the very, very final moment when you have to shoot and the aim is to prevent the criminal or suspect causing harm to other people," he said.

Under surveillance

However, the victim's cousin, Alex Pereira, who is based in London, said: "[The police] have to pay for [Friday's killing] in many ways, because if they do not, they are going to kill many people, they are going to kill thousands of people.

"They just kill the first person they see, that's what they did.

"They killed my cousin, they could kill anyone."

Mr Menezes was killed after fleeing armed police as he travelled to work.

He had been followed by police from his block of flats in Tulse Hill, which was under surveillance in the hunt for the group behind Thursday's attempted bombings.

Mr Menezes had boarded the number 2 bus to Stockwell.

Police said his padded jacket had heightened suspicions about his journey. He was shot as he ran on to a train.

Heavy coats or clothing are often worn by suicide bombers in other parts of the world to help them disguise their bombs.

The Independent Police Complaints Commission has opened an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death.

In Brazil, relatives are demanding answers to why Mr Menezes ran and why he was shot by police.

Cousin Maria do Socorro, speaking before details about the visa emerged, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I think they acted incompetently, like amateurs.

"You would think the British police would be prepared, but they are panicking and seeing everyone as a suspect.

"If you are going to have a war on terror, you have got to use brains to fight it not just brute force."

Friends of Mr Menezes in London said he had recently returned to Brazil for eight months to be with his father, who was being treated for cancer.

'Highly trained'

Fausto Soares, 26, said Mr Menezes had been sending money to pay for the treatment and was concerned how the family would now cope financially.

Former Prime Minister Sir John Major has defended the police's actions.

Speaking on the Today programme, Sir John said: "These officers are very highly trained. Very few of them are permitted to carry arms, but in that second they had no-one to help them, no-one to turn to.

"They had to make a decision. Do we take this dreadful decision to shoot, or do we face the risk that conceivably, if our worst fears are right, a bomb could be detonated that could kill people, including them, in the next second or so?"


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: brazil; okwithme; shootemalltobesafe; terrorism; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-210 next last
To: Americanexpat

Not paying for mass transit and jumping the turnstile is not a good idea.

The Police did the only thing they could under the circumstances. This "victim" might be a nominee for this year's "Darwin Awards" in fact. Hard to top the number of truly stupid moves he made, if really innocent.


121 posted on 07/25/2005 7:05:01 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

To smother a potential blast.


122 posted on 07/25/2005 7:05:21 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
>I don't think the US cop would have pulled the trigger under these circumstances.<

Then the US Cop would be stupid.These guys were charged with guarding the subway from suicide bombers.They were not involved in chasing down a purse snatcher.Under your plan our soldiers in Iraq are not following correct procedure when they shoot at cars that accelerate toward a checkpoint.

The problem is not poorly trained cops it is a citizenry in London that believes they simply need to out run the cop for 2 blocks because he is not armed.
123 posted on 07/25/2005 7:09:12 AM PDT by Blessed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: mjustice
They were plainclothes. A nearby resident saw them in a car the night before and almost called the police on them because they worried her. This shows that they may have looked and/or acted suspicious, even menacing, to the average resident.

She said: "There were three of them, three white guys. They were in a car, a red car. I was going to call the police because our children were out there and I wasn't sure who they were. Now I know they were plain clothed officers."

124 posted on 07/25/2005 7:11:33 AM PDT by joan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Well I’m not a lawyer, but I believe the rules of engagement are that the police can shoot someone if they believe that person is a danger to the police or the public. Three weeks ago, this would mean they would not shoot at someone running away from them. The arrival of suicide bombers has changed that, because it’s so much harder to tell if they are a danger to the public.

The rules are engagement make perfect sense (IMO), but mistakes will happen. As I say, I’m quite sure US rules would match the ones we now have in place, were suicide bombers to arrive in the US.


125 posted on 07/25/2005 7:12:35 AM PDT by FostersExport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
"Two in the head, you know they're dead" - Samuel L. Jackson in Pulp Fiction

So what is five in the head?

Total neurological dis-function rendering the perp incapable of detonating an explosive device usually concealed under a large, loose jacket.

126 posted on 07/25/2005 7:14:16 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joan

>Well he probably didn't know who they were. They were in plain clothes - he could have thought they were a gang - especially if they were young/looked young.<

So he jumped the turn style in a subway station running over with cops.Use your head he had no reason to fear a mugging in the middle of the day with a cop at every turn.Reasoning like this from watching to much TV is the reason we have OJ juries that turn criminals loose because of "reasonable doubt".


127 posted on 07/25/2005 7:14:47 AM PDT by Blessed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas
To smother a potential blast.

Sure. What better way to combat suicide bombers than with kamikaze cops?

128 posted on 07/25/2005 7:15:29 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Naomi4
Agreed.

Maybe in the future when the police yell "STOP", non-terrorist citizens will actually stop. And by the way, being Brazilian doesn't mean you can't also be a terrorist or working with terrorists. Maybe his story isn't over. To repeat: Why was he wearing a padded coat in the middle of summer? And surely he knew that the armed police weren't chasing down people with expired work visas. Had he been a terrorist and had the bomb exploded and had innocent people been murdered, all of England would be demanding to know why the police didn't shoot him.

129 posted on 07/25/2005 7:16:07 AM PDT by carmody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
So what is five in the head?

A lot of excess adrenalin.

130 posted on 07/25/2005 7:17:22 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

I have read the whole thread and your comment sums it up for me -- have no sympathy for anyone that stays in a Country after their student visa has expired.

All you have to do is remember Moussaouri and the people around him that had expired student visas way before 9-11. They lived here in Norman, were friends with Nicholas Berg, and at least one of them along with Moussaouri is still in jail and hope it stays that way.


131 posted on 07/25/2005 7:18:14 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- J.C. for OK Governor in '06; Allen/Watts in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The guy who ran from the police onto a train in a heavy coat in June is the one who screwed up.

The police made the right decision under the circumstances.

132 posted on 07/25/2005 7:19:49 AM PDT by ohioWfan ("If My people, which are called by My name, will humble themselves and pray.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

This actually would have been a brilliant tactic by Islamists. They can still adopt it, in fact. Send in a few guys who look suspicious, but actually are no threat, and have the police kill them and then wait for the outrage and the end of the shoot to kill policy and the use of profiling. A perfect way to make the UK's defenses softer.


133 posted on 07/25/2005 7:21:01 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spann_Tillman
In his head there's five; he's no longer alive!

Good one! I like it!

134 posted on 07/25/2005 7:21:39 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty (Thank GOD There's a Cowboy in the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant; FostersExport
It means nothing, but I consulted with a friend who is second-in-command of the police force of the small town in which I live (in the US).

He called it a "righteous shoot" even though the results were tragic, and said he would have done the same were he faced with the same situation. Facing the threat of terrorism means having to make that awful decision between one person's life and that of dozens of people. Shooting to wound isn't an option on a suicide bomber for reasons amply explained elsewhere.

The people this poor man's family should be focusing their anger towards are the bombers, who put SO19 or whatever branch of the Met Police who were involved, in this terrible situation.

135 posted on 07/25/2005 7:23:07 AM PDT by Heatseeker ("I sort of like liberals now. They’re kind of cute when they’re shivering and afraid." - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
How about "Take proper actions to renew visa as legally required?"

Probably cheaper than the bullet-proof vest.

136 posted on 07/25/2005 7:23:47 AM PDT by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom

I'm sure the ACLU is working hard to get them out.


137 posted on 07/25/2005 7:24:23 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Trigger pressure too light when stress level is too high.

Remember this Cop thought he was falling on a live bomb. He had no reason to believe he wasn't and 8 (recent) reasons to believe he was.


138 posted on 07/25/2005 7:25:22 AM PDT by lOKKI (You can ignore reality until it bites you in the ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
"I don't think this would pass muster under the US rules of engagement. Maybe there is something wrong with their rules of engagement."

Your right, it probably wouldn't pass the muster for US rules of engagement, doesn't mean the rules for the Brits are wrong.

Our cops probably would have taken a few seconds to decide if they would get sued or not and IF the guy had been wearing a bomb belt a lot of folks could have died.

Besides, lets say that this guy had been a terrorists and the cops had wrestled him to the ground and he detonated the bomb killing himself, the five police officers and a few people on that subway car. Some people on this thread would have called them stupid and incompetent and others, the cop haters,would have cheered him on.
139 posted on 07/25/2005 7:26:20 AM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Free Baptist
He did not heed a lawful order by police to stop/halt. (2nd offense)

It's not clear he heard them. And they were plain-clothes cops, so it wasn't clear they were really cops, even.

He resisted arrest. (3rd offense)

Perhaps, not knowingly.

140 posted on 07/25/2005 7:26:41 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson