Posted on 07/20/2005 3:27:23 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
KUWAIT CITY - Muslims from Indonesia to the Middle East on Wednesday labeled as aggressive and irresponsible a U.S. congressman's suggestion that the United States could "take out" Islamic holy sites if Muslim attackers targeted America in a nuclear strike.
Some demanded an apology. Many said the comments fuel Islamic extremism and leave Muslims feeling Americans equate terrorists with all of Islam.
"American mentality imagines that a religion is attacking another religion, and here lies the danger," said Syrian political analyst Ahmed al-Haj Ali. He called it "frightening" to "retaliate against the birthplace of Islam for individual criminal acts or acts committed by groups that are condemned by Islam."
Rep. Tom Tancredo, a Colorado Republican, was asked on a radio talk show Friday how the United States should respond if terrorists struck several of its cities with nuclear weapons.
"Well, what if you said something like if this happens in the United States, and we determine that it is the result of extremist, fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their holy sites," Tancredo answered.
When host Pat Campbell of WFLA-AM in Orlando, Fla. asked if he meant "bombing Mecca," the congressman responded: "Yeah."
Mecca and Medina, in Saudi Arabia, are Islam's holiest cities. All able-bodied Muslims are required to make a pilgrimage there at least once in their lives. Mecca is the birthplace of Islam's prophet Muhammad and home to the Kaaba, Islam's most sacred site, which Muslims around the world face when they perform daily prayers.
"I find it strange that such a comment comes from someone who represents a civilized people," said Hamed al-Abdullah, a Kuwait University political science teacher. The comment should be rejected by civic societies, the Congress and President Bush, he said.
U.S. State Department spokesman Adam Ereli called the congressman's statement "insulting and offensive." He said Americans "respect the dignity and sanctity of other religions."
In Egypt, the liberal al-Ghad Party condemned Tancredo's comments and demanded "an official apology to all Muslim nations, who love peace and reject arrogance and violence."
"It's aggressive and it is exceeding all limits and doesn't serve anything but extremism and terrorism," al-Ghad said in statement published in its mouthpiece newspaper by the same name.
Tancredo has refused to apologize, telling The Associated Press his comments had been taken out of context. He said he never said he wanted to bomb Mecca or Medina and added that it would be better to think of ways to prevent a terrorist attack, noting that he didn't want to "inflame this issue."
But some Muslims still felt Tancredo's remarks reflected a broader American opinion. "America is trying to market the idea of striking at Mecca in order to fight fundamentalism. This is crazy talk devoid of logic," said Sheik Hisham Hassani, a Syrian expert on fundamentalist groups. He accused Washington of sowing "sectarian discord that always begins with such utterances."
The leader of Indonesia's most influential group of Islamic clerics criticized the remarks as "irresponsible" and called on Americans to protest them. "How can an American congressman say something like that?" said Amidhan, who goes by one name. "It just reflects his inability as a politician."
"Does he understand anything about human rights? At least when the United States attacks Iraq, Muslims blame the government not the American people," Amidhan said.
Al-Abdullah, the Kuwaiti political scientist, put some blame on the way the question was put to the congressman. "These imaginary 'what if' questions are endless," he said.
Please explain how discussing a potential deterrent/retaliation increases burdens on our troops overseas? And how exactly am I being "selfish" by mentioning this? I don't get royalties every time a politican mentions it.
You sir/mamm are showing your desperation with such vapant rhetoric.
Let's give the Islamofascists some propaganda points they'll never forget.
Uh it's a big world out there, and tancredo's words can be used against our troops in the mideast.
But that doesn't matter to tancredo, he only thinks about himself.
" You sir/mamm are showing your desperation with such vapant rhetoric."
LOL, oh the irony......
You are correct...However, I was trying to point out that I assume our military people in any theater of war, would welcome retailation if the homeland was attacked during the war...Everyone I talked to that was in Viet Nam would have loved to have seen a nuke fall on Hanoi, regardless of whether Viet Nam attacked us or not...No one expressed concern that it would make the left alive Viet Cong angry...
Hey, I'm still learnin'...
Dane can't explain anything, he's simply too dense...which explains why he's a puppet of the jihadists and commies.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1447104/posts?page=178#178
You may think of this as one big joke.
I just happen to think giving our enemies propaganda points as tancredo did is nothing to joke about.
I should have made my question clearer, like: "Are you sure you're not a jihadist bot?"
Wonder where his mujahidin friends, bayourod, Checkers, Cultural jihad et al are. Planning another cultural attack, perhaps?
In the vaccum between your ears.
I would love to see ANY of the energy given to criticizing Tancredo going openly and vocally against all their terrorists that their moon god religion keeps vomiting up. They are hypocrites and that make it hard for me to care about their indignation.
Oh, I guess I misinterpreted you...I thought you meant something else :)
We're back to talking point #1.
Apparently the DemonRATS didn't give you an extensive list of talking points.
You're going around in circles and repeating the same jihadist tune. About a different one, please?
" In the vaccum between your ears."
You're the only one that has empty space between your ears, which is why you repeat the talking points of your jihadist friends.
LOL!!!!!!!!
Tell that to tancredo, he seems to be putting mucho energy in giving our enenmies gift wrapped propaganda points.
Is he doing a cut and paste job?
"In the vaccum between your ears."
Is that a Talking Point or jus a ready-made phrase you retrieved from your memory banks?
Good analogy.
Can't placate Africanized bees by just leaving them alone, can you?
I think so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.