Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement Of Senator Barbara Boxer On The Nomination Of Judge John G. Roberts
B. Boxer Web Site (paid for by Us) ^ | July 19, 2005 | B. Boxer

Posted on 07/20/2005 2:45:18 PM PDT by Syncro

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Syncro
he could join with the right-wing block on the Court which has consistently expressed the belief that a woman’s right to choose isn’t guaranteed, nor is the federal government’s ability to protect workers, the environment, and a family-friendly workplace.

If Hillary is the devil's wife, Barbara Boxer is the devil's mistress.

The tiny woman inside a womb has very little choice when she is dismembered in a late-term abortion. Some restrictions on abortion are reasonable, even if abortion remains legal by federal edict. O'Connor was wrong in her opinions on late-term abortions.

41 posted on 07/20/2005 3:49:15 PM PDT by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
or failing that drag the process on interminably i.e. delay, delay, delay .

Has anyone started a pool on how long it will be before we hear that the nomination is not ready to go to a vote because we merry band of nutcase senators have not been given the information we have demanded and without which we cannot properly do our jobs?

42 posted on 07/20/2005 3:53:05 PM PDT by Bahbah (Something wicked this way comes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
a woman’s right to choose ... and a family-friendly workplace

She used these two phrases in the same sentence. The irony might be laughable if it wasn't so tragic. There's very little 'family-friendliness', Ms. Boxer, in the 'choice' to suck the brains out of an innocent, defenseless, trusting baby.

43 posted on 07/20/2005 3:54:59 PM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Hypocrite and dipstick come to mind.


44 posted on 07/20/2005 3:56:29 PM PDT by jos65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpanter

No, they also want gay marriage and total gun prohibition as well as an end to private property.....


45 posted on 07/20/2005 4:06:28 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Too bad that Boxer's mother didn't believe in abortion.


46 posted on 07/20/2005 4:10:40 PM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Again, my apologies to the other 49 states that our once-fair state afflicted the country and the U.S. Senate with Mesdames Boxer and Feinstein, two of the worst whackos in Congress.


47 posted on 07/20/2005 4:15:03 PM PDT by Calif Conservative (RWR and GWB backer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

If you look closely at Boxer's statement, you can see the the name "Edith Clement" has been whited out and the name "John G. Roberts" typed in on top. These dems truly are scumbags!


48 posted on 07/20/2005 4:20:19 PM PDT by Tacis ("Democrats - The Party of Traitors, Treachery and Treason!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

"I'm going to vote for him, before I vote against him"


49 posted on 07/20/2005 4:23:44 PM PDT by strange1 ("Show the enemy harm so he shall not advance" Sun Tzu The Art of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
"I look forward to the in-depth hearings by the Judiciary Committee and a further evaluation of this nominee."

Oh no, ... I predict many more charts.



Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., right, discuss the leaking of a CIA operative's identity during a news conference on Capitol Hill Wednesday, July 20, 2005 in Washington.
50 posted on 07/20/2005 4:28:41 PM PDT by maggief (No 'luffs')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
"Without prejudging the nominee, I do believe Judge Roberts’ record raises questions about his commitment to the right to privacy, protection of the environment, and other important issues.

**Yawn**

51 posted on 07/20/2005 4:29:34 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Does this mean FDR's 'third term' is finally coming to an end?

Sixty years later and Boxer still can't remove her face from the buttcheeks of socialism/communism.

52 posted on 07/20/2005 4:50:57 PM PDT by budwiesest (I used to hit home-runs for fun. Today, I hit them out of necessity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
"Without prejudging the nominee, I do believe Judge Roberts’ record raises questions about his commitment to the right to privacy, protection of the environment, and other important issues.

Why Ms Boxer? Please cite some actual facts or is it that you don't have any?

53 posted on 07/20/2005 5:28:40 PM PDT by The Toad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpanter
I am amazed that the first thing out of their mouths every single time they open it - is abortion. It is truly sickening.
That's actually a very good point and might be used to good advantage. "The democrat party - defending your right to kill your babies!" Maybe a bumper sticker? ;-)
54 posted on 07/20/2005 5:34:29 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (In honor of our bravest in armed service to our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Babs challenging Roberts is no big deal. Roberts will swat her away like a fly on a donkey! You get to pick out the donkey! Image hosted by Photobucket.com Image hosted by Photobucket.com Image hosted by Photobucket.com
55 posted on 07/20/2005 5:37:18 PM PDT by tuvals (America First - Support Our Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

THe Marine second from the right looks like he's combining his thousand-mile stare with a good case of "stank-eye."


56 posted on 07/20/2005 7:02:11 PM PDT by bootless (Never Forget - And Never Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tuvals

"The burden is on a nominee to the Supreme Court to prove that he is worthy, not on the Senate to prove that he is unworthy."

Schumer... that guy chimed in today too! How come Judicial Nominees are guilty until proven innocent? I guess that's the Democratic way! Show trials and abortion on demand. No wonder the PRC donates so much money to Democrats, they are almost identical ideologically.


57 posted on 07/20/2005 7:03:19 PM PDT by ca-dreamer74 (Known Blog-Pimp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
Hello!...car 54 where are you?...miss you and wish you were here to join the discussion...come on buddy, you are missed..s
58 posted on 07/20/2005 9:03:36 PM PDT by scott says
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson