Posted on 07/20/2005 9:07:28 AM PDT by wesley_windam-price
One of the most frequently asked questions I hear is this: Why does the federal government refuse to accept its responsibility to enforce immigration laws and border security?
Now the answer is becoming clear.
And it's not pretty.
The shadow government the elitists do indeed have a plan. And it is a plan that does not include any vestige of U.S. sovereignty or constitutional government. It is a plan for merger a European Union-style government for North America and eventually the rest of the Americas and the world.
It's all spelled out in the latest reports by the Council on Foreign Relations. There's a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community" with a common "outer security perimeter."
Though there has been no national debate on merger with the corruption and socialism of our neighbors to the north and south, there is a roadmap. And unless the American people rise up in righteous indignation against this plan, the roadmap to merger will become the inevitable, guiding force in setting U.S. policy.
In many ways, it already has.
The goal of this merger couldn't be clearer "a common economic space ... for all people in the region, a space in which trade, capital and people flow freely."
The CFR's strategy calls specifically for "a more open border for the movement of goods and people." It calls for laying "the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America." It calls for us to "harmonize visa and asylum regulations." It calls for us to "harmonize entry screening."
More open? How could it be any more open? How could the flow of people be any freer? Criminals, terrorists, drug dealers and other undesirables cross into the U.S. on a daily basis unchecked, unmolested, unscreened. How could we have any less enforcement?
Well, imagine Mexico as the 51st state. That's a picture of what the CFR has in mind with regard to the flow of human traffic back and forth between the two countries.
By the way, even though you didn't hear any national debate about this plan, your president has already committed you, your children and your grandchildren to this policy, according to the CFR.
In "Building a North American Community," the shadow government's 59-page manifesto for merger, we are informed President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin "committed their governments" to this goal March 23 when they met in Texas.
You might remember that little get-together. It was there that Bush characterized the the Minuteman organization of heroic citizen border monitors as "vigilantes."
Last month, a follow-up meeting was held in Canada, suggesting this plan be put on the fast track. The U.S. representative, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, explained at that time that "we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders."
Silly me. I thought the objective of Homeland Security was to protect the American people from terrorist attacks! But the real goal is making it easier for Mexicans and Canadians and anyone else using those territories to enter our country undetected and unmolested.
The CFR plan also calls for massive redistribution of wealth more of your hard-earned money flowing to Mexico and Canada to make this panacea possible. It also calls for the implementation of "the Social Security Totalization Agreement" so that illegal aliens will be certain to bankrupt the system Bush claims to be trying to save.
It is a stunning betrayal of the will of the American people, the Constitution of the United States, the Declaration of Independence and all of our notions of limited government, self-government, freedom, sovereignty, the rule of law and justice.
I don't know how else to say it: It is an open conspiracy to commit treason.
It's time to fight the War of Independence all over again.
I doubt very much whether "mode 4" refers to people crossing at locations other than official border crossing points. I suspect that the designation "free movement of persons" refers to the need (or lack of need) for a passport/visa when going through an official border crossing station.
I agree. The only way I'd go for a merger with Mexico would be for Mexico to come under our Constitution, control and annex itself into the US.
Leaving the governments the way the are now but merely opening the border is akin to national suicide. There would need to be huge sweeping reforms within Mexico first and enough time to show that they are a responsible nation for me to feel more at ease with this proposal. 2010 doesn't seem like enough time to me.
Then you'd better get busy , son.
Read up on it. "free movement of persons" means just that. Mode 4 is implemented in the EU. Thats why, once the terrorists got their bomb making materials into Britain. Once they got it into the EU it traveled through many countries, without official border checks because guess what? THERE ARE NO BORDERS in the EU. Remember? They got rid of them when they formed the EU.
Click and enjoy!
In line with W's thinking about these issues, I've always tried to imagine what life might be like for people in the 6 adjacent Mexican border states if annexed by the US. An honest law enforcement, intact, functional DOJ, reasonable taxation etc with the support of the US Marshalls would render those border states a new life within the USA. The concern has always been that most of the world regards the US Constitution and its ideals as a threat, and that any "en mass" changes in sovereignity within the New World would be accompanied by attempts to castrate the Constitution.
Where do you find the energy?
You are really amazing.
I am so out of patience with all these numbskulls.
The worst part is FR is a thousand times more awake and intelligent than the general sheepledom.
We can't get Freepers to open their eyes and look at something when you put it right in front of their face.
What chance do we have with the slumbering sheep?
But they aren't talking about annexing, they're talking about merging.
Like a lynchmob, the mergees will sink to a level slightly below the worst participants.
Then wait until they do the double continent zone.
That will be hell on earth.
Other advantages would be bringing the rule of law to the area of contracts between individuals. Then you would see US capital flow into these "territories" and improvements being made. How do we get the corrupt government of Mexico and the European government of Canada to petition for statehood? Or should we awaken Andrew Jackson?
According to WTO/GATS documents, Mode 4 allows for a person or persons to go to another country to provide specific services on-site at a business. The example given is a Malaysian company hiring a British consulting firm, and having one of the British consultants travel to Malaysia to assist on-site. It says nothing about allowing unrestricted movement of persons across a national border bypassing legal customs facilities.
Yes.
The "territory" has to vote to become a state. Mexico is not a territory of the US right now, as far as I know, and I doubt that the people of Mexico would vote to become a state of the United States, there's way too much national pride in that country.
So the stealthy internationalists just use "free trade" to eliminate borders. By the time the people wake up, their country will be gone.
It's so funny that all I ever see is the movements of MEXICANS back and forth. AMERICANS are learning it's a better idea not to go to that benighted "country".
I don't think this will happen. I don't think this is any more likely than Israel and Palestine, two sovereign neighbors living side-by-side in peace and security. Why? Because the palis and the mexis can't handle it. All they know how to do is take. And that means they will blow any kind of deal or arrangement we make with them, no matter how many chances we give them to get it right.
And they have nothing to offer but death, disease, and despair. We're onto them. We aren't going back to sleep. We're not going away on this. We the people will win on this even if it takes 10 years and we have to turn the entire government over to do it. It's that serious, and people are united arouond this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.