Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Boxer Calls Nomination of Supreme Court Justice " an Extraordinary Circumstance"
Fox News

Posted on 07/19/2005 11:33:16 AM PDT by fedupjohn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-218 next last
To: fedupjohn
Well people they just moved the goal posts.

That's okay. Pretty soon they will be in the Dawg Pound where the fans/voters will eat them alive.

161 posted on 07/19/2005 12:36:41 PM PDT by MIchaelTArchangel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn
Sen. Boxer Calls Nomination of Supreme Court Justice " an Extraordinary Circumstance"

Freeper Disambiguator Calls Existence of Sen. Boxer's Intellect "an Extraordinary Circumstance"

162 posted on 07/19/2005 12:37:08 PM PDT by Disambiguator (Making accusations of racism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heartofsong83

Don't worry. We have the votes for the nuclear option.

55 Republicans
-7 Members of the Gang of Seven
-1 Arlen Specter
+3 Members of the Gang of Seven who have said they WILL go nuclear if they have to.
+1 Dick Cheney to break the tie.
--
50 Votes for the nuclear option.


163 posted on 07/19/2005 12:37:43 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

That's why the feds have to shut down PANTEX. ;^)


164 posted on 07/19/2005 12:38:15 PM PDT by DesertDreamer ("We have a calling from beyond the stars to stand for freedom."~~President George W. Bush, 9/2/2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

You knew they would. Frist better check his testicles.


165 posted on 07/19/2005 12:39:16 PM PDT by pankot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drama queen
Why is it wrong to call for judge Greer's impeachment but not wrong to practice what I like to call selective impeachment, that is, having a pro-abortion litmus test to simply dismiss any prospective judicial nominee who is not liberal enough?

Boxer can vote based on litmus tests, the Zodiac or numerology for all I care. Just so long as the rest of the Senators are allowed to vote as well.

The Democrats will come to rue the day the Supreme Court handed Roe vs. Wade. It has united people against them like nothing else could. Absent Roe vs. Wade, there would be no Conservative movement in this country.

The Republicans have the votes in the Senate today because of Roe vs. Wade. It is time for that pendulum to swing back the other way.

166 posted on 07/19/2005 12:40:10 PM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

Comment #167 Removed by Moderator

To: EQAndyBuzz

You mean the confirmation threads?...they'll be no problem getting folks to do that..


168 posted on 07/19/2005 12:42:50 PM PDT by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: dangus

That's a worst-case scenario too. More likely, we will have 5 or 6 of the Gang of 7 Republicans, plus 1 or 2 maverick Democrats. That would lead us with at least 53-55 votes.


169 posted on 07/19/2005 12:43:10 PM PDT by Heartofsong83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: dangus

A small problem in your equation. There are 100 senators and the VP only votes in case of a tie so it would require 51.


170 posted on 07/19/2005 12:44:53 PM PDT by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: katieanna
Beg to differ with you. IMHO, Frist doesn't have the guts to pull out the nuclear option plus it's the gang of 14 that run the Senate, not Frist.
171 posted on 07/19/2005 12:45:09 PM PDT by kagnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: fedupjohn

What a surprise!....not


172 posted on 07/19/2005 12:45:16 PM PDT by midwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Buchholz

Oops. I meant to put 50+1 at the bottom! Check my math: There are 51 votes for passage.


173 posted on 07/19/2005 12:47:15 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Mind-numbed Robot

We'll see.


174 posted on 07/19/2005 12:51:57 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Scratch a Liberal. Uncover a Fascist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: katieanna
If they filibuster, say bye bye to McCain's political career.
175 posted on 07/19/2005 12:53:11 PM PDT by JABBERBONK (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dangus
 

 

 

<<Democrat Ben Nelson said the nominee should get an up or down vote, but he may only oppose the use of the filibuster, and not the "nuclear option." If I remember correctly, certain Democrats echoed his opinion.>>

It really doesn't matter if Senator Nelson is for or against the Nuclear Option. We don't need any Democrats for the nuke option, only 2 of the seven republicans in the gang of 14 plus Dick Cheney. Lindsey Graham, John Warner and I think John McCain have already said publicly that if a filibuster is started without "unusual circumstances" over an appointee, they will support the nuke option.

 

 

176 posted on 07/19/2005 12:53:55 PM PDT by HawaiianGecko (Doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results is the definition of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma

Well her we go again!


177 posted on 07/19/2005 12:56:14 PM PDT by LYSandra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

Yes, but remember, the two RINO Senators from Maine--Snowe and Collins?--sent that letter to O'Connor asking her to stay on the Court to prevent a nasty confirmation fight.

It wouldn't surprise me to see those two and a couple of other limp-spined RINOs *not* in the Gang of Fourteen backstab Frist on attempting to invoke cloture. There's 55 Pubbies in the Senate, you know a couple will defect, he'll need 7-10 Rats to go along with him to be sure of shutting down a filibuster. Sounds like the Nucular(tm GWB) Option may be the only way to do this, if Babs is right and the deal is off.

}:-)4


178 posted on 07/19/2005 12:56:32 PM PDT by Moose4 (Richmond, Virginia--commemorating 140 years of Yankee occupation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: HawaiianGecko

I said as much myself three times in this thread. Except for one thing: Specter is NOT one of the gang of 14. I'd be surprised if he goes nuclear, so I figure we need three of the gang to go nuclear.


179 posted on 07/19/2005 12:57:33 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: steveegg
I'll leave the "why" for others to put money on.

I was once given a phrase of unknown provenance that has served me well over the years.

Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity.

Time will tell which of us is correct, but my money is on stupid.
180 posted on 07/19/2005 12:57:59 PM PDT by timpad (The Wizard Tim - Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade, Finder of Obscurata)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson