Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CAFTA undermines immigration laws
North County Times ^ | Sunday, July 17, 2005 | TOM TANCREDO

Posted on 07/17/2005 11:10:40 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer

Congress will soon take up the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA), which many see as an extension of NAFTA and a precursor to the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas that would convert all of North and South America into one integrated market.

Opinions about CAFTA's impact on the regional economy vary widely among members of Congress based largely on what the agreement will do for their constituents. But in the rush to highlight who wins and who loses when these trade barriers come down, almost everyone has overlooked the troubling non-trade provisions that are tucked into the voluminous document.

CAFTA would do more than just phase out tariffs and open new markets ---- a lot more. For example, buried among its nearly 1,000 pages, the agreement contains an expansive definition of "cross-border trade in services." This definition would give people in Central American nations a de facto right to work in the United States. CAFTA is more than a trade agreement about sugar and bananas. It is a thinly disguised immigration accord.

The immigration provisions are cloaked as "service agreements" in the document that have become standard fare in most trade agreements.

One article of CAFTA reads, "Cross-border trade in services or cross-border supply of services means the supply of a service ... by a national of a party in the territory of another party." CAFTA goes on to stipulate that member nations take care to ensure that local and national "measures relating to qualification requirements and procedures, technical standards and licensing requirements do not constitute unnecessary barriers to trade in services," and to guarantee that our domestic laws are "not in themselves a restriction on the supply of the service."

What those provisions mean is that a foreign company would be empowered under CAFTA to challenge the validity of our immigration laws. If an international tribunal rules against us, Congress would then be forced to change our immigration laws or face international trade sanctions. These tribunals have the authority to rule that U.S. immigration limits, visa requirements, or even licensing requirements and zoning rules are "unnecessary burdens to trade" that act as "restrictions on the supply of a service."

This hidden legislation to open the U.S. border is only the beginning.

The chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means, which oversees most international trade matters, believes that these kinds of immigration provisions are fair game for future trade deals as well.

If CAFTA were really just about trade, the agreement would be little more than a few pages long, declaring that tariff treatment for U.S. and Central American goods will be on a reciprocal basis. But it isn't. In reality, CAFTA is about expanding a growing body of international law that supersedes our own.

If CAFTA is approved, Congress' "exclusive" authority to regulate immigration policy will be subjugated to the whim of international tribunals and trade panels ---- in much the same way that Congress' once supreme constitutional authority to "regulate commerce with foreign nations," has already been largely ceded to the WTO.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: aliens; borders; cafta; caftalicense; ftaa; hemispheric; immigrantlist; immigration; integration; nafta; redistribution; tancredo; wealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: hedgetrimmer

But wait... if these illegals are willing to work for pennies on the dollar, it's just capitalism right? What's good for the free market is good for America, right?

/sarcasm


41 posted on 07/18/2005 8:20:58 AM PDT by gonewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meema
And they know it,

Its true. I did a casual survey of my senators a couple of weeks ago. I asked them if they knew of Mode 4 and the WTO rule that would place immigration authority with the USTRs office instead of Congress. They said they were aware.
42 posted on 07/18/2005 8:21:54 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Yep ... but try telling that to the sheeple that believe it is all about "free" trade.


43 posted on 07/18/2005 8:22:56 AM PDT by Just A Nobody (I - LOVE - my attitude problem!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: gonewt
What do you think of the President's visit to your state pushing CAFTA? Do you think the press handled the issues fairly with all the facts?

The MSM attacks the President at every opportunity, they could have a field day if they actually told the truth about the CAFTA. Why don't they?
44 posted on 07/18/2005 8:24:18 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Just what America DOESN'T need. Don't we already have about 20 million slave laborers here?

Every single person who pays taxes is a slave laborer.

45 posted on 07/18/2005 8:24:39 AM PDT by Protagoras (Now that the frog is fully cooked, how would you like it served?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Why isn't it on the front in the bold print so the Congressmen voting for the bill will see it?

What makes you think they don't already know about, and support it?

46 posted on 07/18/2005 8:25:55 AM PDT by Euro-American Scum (A poverty-stricken middle class must be a disarmed middle class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; JohnHuang2; keri; international american; Kay Soze; jpsb; hershey; TomInNJ; ...
If CAFTA were really just about trade, the agreement would be little more than a few pages long, declaring that tariff treatment for U.S. and Central American goods will be on a reciprocal basis.

But it isn't.

In reality, CAFTA is about expanding a growing body of international law that supersedes our own.

==================================


47 posted on 07/18/2005 8:30:27 AM PDT by Happy2BMe (Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
What the CFR has planned for America is a nightmare.

EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT!

http://www.cfr.org/pdf/NorthAmerica_TF_final.pdf

48 posted on 07/18/2005 8:30:32 AM PDT by Founding Father ( Republicans control the Oval Office, Senate and House, but still can't govern.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Certainly a FAST grassroots campaign in each and every one of our neighborhoods is in order

BTTT

49 posted on 07/18/2005 8:33:42 AM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Have you seen this one yet?


50 posted on 07/18/2005 8:39:10 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

I wish every American could read that link. Many have NO idea what is being planned for us without our consent.


51 posted on 07/18/2005 8:41:32 AM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Thanks for the Ping!


52 posted on 07/18/2005 9:10:10 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: antisocial

You're welcome.


53 posted on 07/18/2005 9:26:34 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen

You can post a FReeper evidence, but you can't make them read.

I've certainly tried.


54 posted on 07/18/2005 9:31:48 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
You can post a FReeper evidence, but you can't make them read.

You're right. Many DON'T WANT to even think that their hero could sign on to what amounts to the destruction of American sovereignty, security, culture, and jobs. Some President he has turned out to be, huh?

55 posted on 07/18/2005 9:37:44 AM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen

Yeah, but I can't help thinking the next one will be much, much worse.

We're kind of stuck.

If we vote third party we get Hillary, if we don't we get someone just like her.

There is no longer a lesser of evils to choose.


56 posted on 07/18/2005 9:41:24 AM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (Google search North American Community.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

It is discouraging to read what is happening behind our backs.


57 posted on 07/18/2005 9:43:27 AM PDT by KittyKares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

I get the creeps realizing that most of them are in on it, including our president.
It makes me very sad. And MAD.


58 posted on 07/18/2005 9:56:09 AM PDT by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
CAFTA is about expanding a growing body of international law that supersedes our own.

Exactly. No one questions why our politicians continue pushing provenly failed policies (failed from the average citizens' positions) no more than they wonder why public and paid education gives them little Che Guevara's back for their investment. I've read through reams of boring CAFTA rules and policy and am convinced it provides nothing positive for our United States. Anyone who wishes to pipe up about this before it's solidified can do so at NumbersUSA totally free of charge.

59 posted on 07/18/2005 9:56:15 AM PDT by NewRomeTacitus (Just because you've never thought about it doesn't make it an impossibility.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
May I echo that? Because it's worthy of a repeat.

Thanks to Congressman Tancredo for the TRUTH about CAFTA.

Tancredo for President 2008/2012.

60 posted on 07/18/2005 9:58:59 AM PDT by TAquinas (Demographics has consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson