Posted on 07/15/2005 8:24:24 PM PDT by twas
I was..........................
.............JOKING!
BTTT
This is really insane! How about in relation to non-American Mexican students, a fund to finance American students be drafted in its place?
What the article points out is a clear danger to every American citizen's freedom!
Fox did say this after he was interviewed..but Pres Bush did not say anysuch thing...and I did not read that the emperor of Kanuckistan affirmed Fox's account of what was discussed at their ranch meeting.
If all those secret groups really control things we have no voice anyway so what difference does it make?
I was..........................
.............JOKING!
Except this is the George Noory version of the truth. He honest to gosh believes this, and that the President is one of the primary instigators of selling out the United States for oil and Bigfoots.
And Noory thinks we should take him SERIOUSLY.
Yep Noory is a first-class crackpot alright.... except when he talks about the "shadow people." They really scare me. I wish someone would do someting about the "shadow people."
Let me ask you some questions. What chance do you think we have that Congress and the President will pull us out of the U.N.? What about the WTO? What about NAFTA? What do you think our chances are of avoiding CAFTA-DR?
I'm sure your answers will mirror my own. There isn't chance that we'll withdraw from any of these. There's your answer.
For whatever reason, our federal officials are convinced that there's no business like 'global business', a loose term meant to convey their adoration of anything global.
The move to set up a 'federation' between Canada, Mexico and the U.S. is all but assured in my opinion. There is already a European Union. There is also an African Union.
NAFTA and CAFTA-DR are mearly the first steps to an American Union. The FTAA and the previously mentioned federation are the next steps. We're being sold out.
Unlike France and Denmark, we'll never get a vote on any of this. We didn't on NAFTA, when polls at the time showed 80% of the public was against it. 80%!
Personally, I don't think they'll have a problem at getting two-thirds in the Senate. I'd suggest it will be something like 90%.
It will be sold as a trade response to the E.U. We'll be told we have no choice of we want to remain competitive. Our leaders will be more than happy to jump into this with both feet.
That's the way I see it.
Almost as bad as WorldSmutDaily.
I saw something similiar to this on the Glenn Beck website several weeks ago, but I ignored it, thinking that surely it wasn't true, I see it again on FreeRepublic, I hate to think that Mr. Bush is really agreeing to this, if this is true, we have to stop this one way or the other.
Paranoid christian reconstructionists.
Almost as bad as WorldSmutDaily
What post are you posting to? This makes no sense to this line of posting?? Either get on topic or get OUT!
Please read this thread. If you think Bush is going to save you, sit down before reading it.
BTW, the CAFTA-DR agreement was signed two years ago.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1443602/posts
Try this one as well...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1443602/posts
Excerpt...
Meet NAFTA on steroids-New U.S.-Mexico-Canada Security PlanWould Virtually Eliminate National Borde
WorldNetDaily ^ | November 15, 2004 | Joseph Farah
Posted on 11/15/2004 1:59:37 AM PST by West Coast Conservative
North American national borders would be virtually eliminated under plans being considered by senior business and political leaders from Canada, the United States and Mexico for a "NAFTA-plus," continent-wide, customs-free zone with a common approach to trade, energy, immigration, law enforcement and security.
A tri-national task force, chaired by former Liberal Party deputy prime minister John Manley, with the full backing of all three governments, is plotting the roadmap for this new, bolder alliance meant to compete with the European Union. William Weld, former governor of Massachusetts and Pedro Aspe, former Mexican finance minister, join Manley on the panel that reports directly to the Council on Foreign Relations.
The mission has the formal blessing of Tom Ridge, U.S. Homeland Security secretary, who is close with President Bush.
Our elites consider any such effective fences a "backward step" and a move away from establishing their future "common perimeter.
An effectve fence is not rocket system, and would cost less than what we spend on illegal aliens in education, medical care, prison costs etc every month.
Sorry, Dan. There are so many of those who are way out there I forgot you weren't.
The members of FR have some of the MOST accurate screennames, too, judging by some of their responses. I was thinking of the frog in boiling water scenario today; it's funny (but not surprising)I see it on FR. Right now, it's about 160 degrees, and my friend Kermit next to me is feeling a little woozy.
Maybe we DON'T wish to keep our republic, Mr. Franklin!!!
Bump for later.
More than two thirds of the Senate are members of the CFR.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.