Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
Something about that scenario doesn't make sense.

It does when you factor in RINOS.

166 posted on 07/14/2005 6:16:29 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: GoLightly; Pukin Dog
After giving this some thought, I'm speculating that all this nonsense over an absolute non-story (the Rove involvement in the Wilson/Plame case) is related to the Supreme Court nomination process, but not through the "impeachment" route described by Pukin Dog here and elsewhere on FR.

I believe the one thing that has the Democrats pulling their hair out right now is their fear that Bush will not nominate a replacement for O'Connor until after Labor Day. What they really want is to get the nominee's name out in the open right now, so they can spend the next 3-4 months working on a well-orchestrated campaign to kill the nomination (just like the "Summer of Bork" in 1987). If the nominee isn't known until just a few weeks before the Supreme Court starts its next term, then any campaign against the nominee will be far less effective.

I believe this Rove fiasco is related to this process, but only insofar as the Democrats are looking for ways to apply negative media scrutiny of the White House. What they are really trying to do here is force the hand of the Bush administration -- by applying enough negative pressure that the White House feels the need to do something momentous (like nominate a Supreme Court justice!) just to change the subject on the national stage.

612 posted on 07/15/2005 6:58:21 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson