Posted on 07/14/2005 5:29:59 PM PDT by blogblogginaway
NY TIMES CLAIMS EXCLUSIVE NEW DETAILS OF EVENTS SURROUNDING CIA LEAK, SOURCES TELL DRUDGE... DEVELOPING LATE OUT OF WASHINGTON... MORE...
Not quite, peach, but close.... Wolfie asked Wilson if his wife was a covert operative at the time of the Novak article and Wilson stammered out a "no comment".
Of course, that begs the question - if Wilson truly believes his wife was "outed" two years ago, why can't he confirm or deny that she was, in fact, a covert cia operative at the time of the Novak article? This is smelling more and more like a calculated attempt at a Bush smear by two Kerry supporters, Wilson and wife Plame, and they got CAUGHT.
This is not Bush's problem, and not Rove's problem. It's a Wilson/Plame problem.
D.
It sounds like it is going to be tomorrows headlines.
One of the reasons I installed MSFT SP2. That has blocked ALL pop ups for me. His site was one of the worst.
Pretty sad, isn't it?
B.S. - Wilson didn't want to see us go to war with Iraq because his business dealings were all tied to the Middle East. Read this:What Wilson Didn't Say about Africa and his silent partners
I slap you one too, just for good measure. :o)
Great post - good information!
ALERT! I am turning off Fox until Wesley Clark has vanished. Someone let me know when I can turn the TV on again!
Normally around midnight I believe. Drudge could have an 'exclusive' prior to that perhaps.
>>> Hmmm. Wonder if red is more important than B&W? Why do I get the feeling this about that Wedding Crashers movie? ...:-)
Must be hugh, but not series. If it were series, he'd have a sireen up... :)
Yes, that's it. Lucy Ramirez got it from Jimmy Hoffa who ran down the Grassy Knoll and tripped just before he gave it to Dan Rather.
Wes on FOX! Now we can get the truth!! Ha Ha!
For all we know, from this information, Chuck Hagel could be a source.
I can't imagine that any halfway competent attorney would ever make such a definitive statement about a (presumably) hostile witness's testimony, based on second-hand information from the witness's attorney. And so far Luskin strikes me as being very, very good. Maybe Fitzgerald's allowing all parties' counsel to attend as a courtesy.
If that's the case...I hope Luskin doesn't believe anything Cooper's lawyer tells him.......I don't even think Cooper's lawyer is allowed in the GJ room when he is testifying...I think a witness is allowed to stop the questioning and go outside and consult his attorney...correct me if Im wrong......so what Cooper says in the jury room and on the courthouse steps are probably two entirely different things.
I cannot imagine this investigation has gone on this long. It should have been wrapped up in three months at most. Every time we have a SP they seem to do just this. And then they come up with nothing in the end. What a waste of our money.
My prediction: a lame story about a "Wilson file" at the White House.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.