Posted on 07/14/2005 1:50:45 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
Don’t ask me, because you know I won’t tell you how I came across this information.
Here is the scoop.
This is all about the Supreme Court.
With the knowledge that Rove was Matthew Cooper’s background source regarding the Plame incident, no matter the fact that no laws were broken, the Democrats leaped upon the matter as a way for Democrats and the MSM to possibly prevent Bush from changing the makeup of the Supreme Court. Under normal circumstances, Democrats cannot stop Bush from reshaping the Supreme Court, and that has Democrats terrified. They cannot sustain a Filibuster without Frist invoking the Nuclear Option on them, so they only have one last option, which is now underway.
The Democrats must demonize Bush to the degree that they can then begin their long-awaited impeachment articles, with the MSM in tow. If Congress can introduce articles of impeachment against Bush, then the MSM will demand that Bush postpone any nominations to the Supreme Court until the matter is decided. It is the only hope they have left of preventing a Conservative Supreme Court from taking hold, and if they do not accomplish this, the flow of money into Democratic coffers will stop instantaneously.
Next week, you will begin to hear Democrats suggesting that if Bush does not fire Karl Rove, then he is guilty of “Obstruction of Justice” and “Lying to the American People” in order to protect a friend. The Media will play along dutifully, because it was there idea in the first place.
Forget about Judith Miller.
Because the Special Prosecutor has asked the White House not to discuss the matter, no one will be able to inform Miller or the NY Times on how Miller should lie to save herself. Without that knowledge, the Times will not let her testify at all. They are paying her to be silent, and it is they who are actually guilty of ‘Obstruction of Justice’ Miller knows who the leaker is, and you all know who I believe that person to be.
What you all are about to see, is the most coordinated, vicious attack ever in the history of Politics against this administration, because those involved have everything at stake. Without control of the Supreme Court, the Liberal agenda is dead for the next 30-40 years. All of their Environmental nonsense, Abortion, Private Property, Affirmative Action and Civil Rights issues go right down the tubes.
The Bush Administration is aware of what is to come, and might be able to prevent it with a little ‘inside baseball’ but the looniest on the left will attempt this no matter what the outcome.
Expect editorials next week, arguing whether or not it is fair for a president who “stole the first election” and won the second election by the “smallest margin of any incumbent President” who is “embroiled in a National Security Scandal” to be deciding on the makeup of the Supreme Court. At the same time, Liberal Senators will begin to suggest that Conformation hearings on anyone Bush selects should be postponed until the investigations are over. Unfortunately for our side, they have an alley in one Arlen Specter. They will be leaning heavily on him to go along with delayed hearings. Specter is already angry with Bush over the Stem-cell research issue.
Will it work? No. Why? Because Bush understands the law, and also understands (with Rove’s help) that no matter how loud and long the Democrats scream, they and the MSM really cant do anything about the Supreme Court, but can effect public opinion. Bush, by telling Republicans to shut up about his choice, has set precedent for when he tells (by his Supreme Court selections) the Democrats the same thing. If he ignores both sides, he can just choose who he wants, and that is exactly what he will do.
So get ready for an ugly, ugly Summer and Fall. Don’t expect to hear much from Bush on Rove, or the Courts after he makes his selections. Republicans in Congress will also be silent (except Specter and Hagel) and will not risk their own re-elections and legacies to side with Democrats this time round.
So there it is, take it or leave it. I wont answer any questions about how or where I got the information, so don’t ask me.
-PD
He said he'd fire someone who "broke the law". No law was broken. No need to fire. End of story!
It is not like it used to be with the OLD MEDIA and the lunatic left getting away with their lies. We can know find out the truth without their input.
DEEPTHROAT-II
Something like that wouldcertainly be a result.
Mr. Brilliant opened his yap when shouldn't have.
Then he went Clintonesque with his silly claims that he didn't name Plame. No, he said "Wilson's wife"!
Sheesh!
If Bush has even a remembrance of his testicles, he should tell Karl not to let the door hit him the in ass on his way out!
So, not only did Bush not promise to fire anybody, he also did not promise to take any action personally.
Well, that's what it means to you. Maybe Bush is going to send around a standover man to break Rove's legs?
Oh yeah, her employer would just LOVE that.
Moreso than if she'd flip on them....
No, score another screwup for an administration that never admits screwups.
Pure nonsense, and counter productive nonsense at that.
About the time they start getting ready for the New Hampshire primary, I'd reckon. But that'll include earlier fundraising trial balloons....
It's time to Rope A Dopey Liberal
We need to out Deepthroat-II
We need to talk about Sandy Burglar
I saw something about Kerry outing an agent?
Offense!!
I hope our side starts using them soon!
If you could spell properly. Like that has a lot to do with everything. We don't need your bull crap correcting our spelling. A word of advice, "Silence is Golden".
Bush said he would deal with anyone found guilty of LEAKING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION (or something to that effect)
He's not "innocent", furthermore he was stupid, furthermore his not-real-bright boss compounded the problem by opening his yap.
Neither one of these arrogant jerks are worth 2-3 Supremes
Sorta like the definition of "is"?
The crystal clear implication was that the leaker would be fired!
Oh yeah? Well, in that case, plurals aren't formed with apostrophes. (Or, as you would write it, "Plural's aren't formed with apostrophe's.")
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.