Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Story Behind the Clinton Body Count (from HILLARY'S SECRET WAR)
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | July 13, 2005 | Richard Poe

Posted on 07/13/2005 9:07:30 AM PDT by Richard Poe

WorldNetDaily.com

WND Exclusive Commentary

HILLARY'S SECRET WAR

The real story behind
the Clinton body count


Posted: July 13, 2005
1:00 a.m. Eastern


Editor's note: The following is an eye-opening look into New York Times best-selling author Richard Poe's revealing book, "Hillary's Secret War." Whereas Edward Klein's book on the New York senator reveals previously unknown aspects of her personal life, Poe's expose focuses on how Hillary Clinton and the left's "shadow government" have labored to put her and her far-left agenda in the White House by controlling the still-uncensored flow of real news to Americans – via the Internet.

If that sounds too fantastic to be true, read on.

By Richard Poe
© 2005 WorldNetDaily.com

"When Clinton lied, nobody died," says a popular bumper sticker.

While untrue, the slogan makes good propaganda. Democrats can repeat it ad infinitum without fear of rebuttal from Republicans. No conservative in public life is willing to broach the topic of the Clinton body count in 2005. Yet the Clintons are more vulnerable on this issue than on any other.

Nixon's articles of impeachment did not accuse him of ordering the burglary of Democratic Party headquarters at the Watergate Hotel. They accused him only of covering up the burglary, after the fact.

Likewise, no one can prove that Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster met his death through foul play. It is quite possible that he committed suicide. However, it has been proved beyond doubt that the Clinton White House obstructed, corrupted and undermined every effort to investigate Foster's death.

Nixon was held accountable for his obstructive acts. The Clintons were not.

A nation in denial

British journalist Ambrose Evans-Pritchard is one of the most knowledgeable investigators of the Foster cover-up. The Cambridge-educated Evans-Pritchard is less easily dismissed than many Clinton critics. He covered war-torn Central America for the Economist and the Sunday Telegraph. As the Telegraph's Washington bureau chief from 1992 to 1997, he "was known in Washington for accuracy, industry and courage" in the words of Washington Post pundit Robert Novak.

Evans-Pritchard has commented on the cocoon of denial into which many decent, well-meaning people retreat when their governments go bad. He has seen it in many countries. "You tell the people in San Salvador that their air force is carpet-bombing the campesinos, they say that's impossible," he remarked to New York Times Magazine writer Philip Weiss. Evans-Pritchard saw a similar self-delusion proliferating in Clinton's America.

According to Evans-Pritchard, he became "radicalized" in Nicaragua. "I could see that what the [foreign] press was writing was not true about the Sandinistas," he told Insight magazine in 1997. "They had a love affair with the revolution. They were all sitting around Managua and going to parties with Sandinista officials. There was a very romantic side to it all. But out there in the countryside, the Sandinistas were doing horrible things to the campesinos ... people were being killed in quite large numbers."

Evans-Pritchard did what his colleagues would not. He traveled the countryside and interviewed campesinos. They were only too glad to tell him about Sandinista atrocities. "For the first time in my life, I realized that what you read in the papers is not true, and this quite shocked me. I started writing from a different point of view, and I found myself very quickly in a big dispute with my colleagues, and it never ended."

In Clinton's America, Evans-Pritchard saw journalists behaving little differently from their colleagues in the Managua press corps. "The way [American reporters] cover Arkansas is exactly the way they covered Nicaragua, which is they didn't go out into the hills and talk to ordinary people," he noted in 1997.

Evans-Pritchard undertook the task himself. He presented his discoveries in a 1997 book titled, "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton: The Unreported Stories" – in my view, the most accurate, thorough and fearless account of Clinton corruption yet produced. It offers a detailed expose of the Clintons' ties to drug lords and death squads, in an America rapidly descending into Salvadoran-style lawlessness.

"To a foreign eye, America looks like a country that is flying out of control," writes Evans-Pritchard.

[I]t is under Clinton that an armed militia movement involving tens of thousands of people has mushroomed out of the plain ... People do not spend their weekends with an SKS rifle, drilling for guerrilla warfare ... in a country that is at ease with itself. It takes very bad behavior to provoke the first simmerings of armed insurgency, and the militias are unmistakably Clinton's offspring.

Regarding Vincent Foster's peculiar death and the ensuing cover-up, Evans-Pritchard wrote in 1997, "The Foster case is taboo for American journalists. In private, many concede that the official story is unbelievable, but they will not broach it in print ... It has nothing to do with party affiliation. If anything, Republican journalists are even more susceptible to the spell."

'Cleaning house'

Jerry Luther Parks was reportedly watching a news bulletin on the death of Vincent Foster when he turned from the television and muttered, "I'm a dead man." His son Gary was with him in the room. It was July 21, 1993. The White House Deputy Counsel had just been found dead in Fort Marcy Park, about seven miles from the White House, across the Potomac River in Virginia. Foster had been shot through the head, said the bulletin, an apparent suicide.

Ambrose Evans-Pritchard interviewed the Parks family extensively. In "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton," he reports that Parks was a nervous wreck for the next two months. He packed a gun and drove evasively to shake off any possible pursuers. At one point, Parks told his family that Bill Clinton was "cleaning house" and that he was "next on the list." Parks had been security chief for Clinton-Gore campaign headquarters in Little Rock, Ark., in 1992.

On Sept. 23, 1993, as Parks was driving to his suburban Little Rock home along the Chenal Parkway, a white Chevrolet Caprice with two men inside drove alongside and peppered Parks' car with semiautomatic gunfire. Parks's car ground to a halt. A man emerged from the white Chevy, fired two rounds into Parks' chest with a 9-mm pistol, then sped off.

Several witnesses watched the murder. The killers were never found. As with so many other "Arkancides" – the name given to the long list of suspicious deaths among Arkansas associates of the Clintons – Big Media ignored the event.

One of the last people to see Vincent Foster alive was Linda Tripp, who then worked as a secretary for Foster's boss, White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum. Tripp testified before Kenneth Starr's grand jury on July 28, 1998, that the reason she had leaked Monica Lewinsky's story to Michael Isikoff at Newsweek was that Tripp hoped the spotlight of national publicity might protect her from physical harm.

"I am afraid of this administration," Tripp told the Grand Jury.

I have what I consider to be well-founded fears of what they are capable of ... I had reasons to believe that the Vince Foster tragedy was not depicted accurately under oath by members of the administration ... I knew based on personal knowledge, personal observations, that they were lying under oath. So it became very fearful to me that I had information even back then that was dangerous.

"But do you have any examples of violence being done by the administration to people who were a threat to them?" asked a juror.

Tripp named Jerry Parks. "[T]he behavior in the West Wing with senior staff to the president during the time the Jerry Parks [murder report] came over the fax frightened me. He had been killed," said Tripp. The "flurry of activity," the closed-door meetings, and the "hush-hush" atmosphere in the White House all struck her as ominous and frightening.

"Maybe you had to be there," said Tripp.

[The news of Parks' death] was something they wanted to get out in front of. There was talk that this would be another body to add to the list of 40 bodies or something that were associated with the Clinton administration. At that time, I didn't know what that meant. I have since come to see such a list.

Some skeptics might discount Tripp's fears as fanciful, even hysterical. But Tripp was no hysteric. On the contrary, she had been trained to deal with stress and intrigue to a greater degree than most. According to the New York Times, Tripp worked for "highly classified Army intelligence and commando units in the 1980s," including as an aide to the top-secret Delta Force. "[I]'ve worked on the covert side of the Department of Defense," Tripp told congressional investigators. In short, Linda Tripp was a spook, a professional denizen of the intelligence underworld. Her observations should not be lightly dismissed.

Richard Poe is the investigative editor of David Horowitz's Center for the Study of Popular Culture, as well as managing editor of Horowitz's group blog Moonbat Central. The views expressed in Poe's book, "Hillary's Secret War," are the author's own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Center for the Study of Popular Culture.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aep; arkancide; bodycount; clintonbodycount; clintonfoundation; clintonscandals; coverup; evanspritchard; hillaryclinton; hillaryssecretwar; hitlary; hrc; impeachedpotus; jerryparks; lindatripp; mediabias; pritchard; richardpoe; stalinstyleshowtrial; thebentone; vincentfoster; whitewash; worstlady; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last
To: radar101

Yes, she is much worse than politically ambitious. She is evil and I very much believe that she would indeed willingly become the antichrist should the opportunity arise.


61 posted on 07/13/2005 11:48:47 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
loreldan writes: "No matter how far left the mainstream press leans, I can't bring myself to believe that they would cover up a charge of this magnitude. Not 100% of them."

Many mainstream journalists tried to expose the truth.

New York Post reporter Christopher Ruddy broke the story of the Vincent Foster coverup. The Clinton White House pressured Rupert Murdoch into firing Ruddy (that's in tomorrow's installment).

As noted in the excerpt of my book posted above, Sunday Telegraph Washington Bureau Chief Ambrose Evans-Pritchard wrote extensively about the Clinton body count. Washington Post columnist Bob Novak praised Evans-Pritchard for this work.

The list goes on: Former Wall Street Journal columnist Micah Morrison; former editor-in-chief of the Sacramento Union Joseph Farah; Philip Weiss of The New York Observer...

Many mainstream journalists spoke out. But they were shouted down by the crowd.

62 posted on 07/13/2005 11:54:22 AM PDT by Richard Poe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

And .. Linda had first-hand knowledge of the "Clinton Body Count" because a list of those dead people was left on her chair in her office.

She said she took it as a warning to shut up - or she would end up the same way.


63 posted on 07/13/2005 11:57:02 AM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: carl in alaska

"85% of them are Democrats."

What about the other 15%? Did they not know about it?


64 posted on 07/13/2005 11:58:35 AM PDT by loreldan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
loreldan asks: "What about the other 15% [of mainstream journalists]? Did they not know about it?"

See my post above.

65 posted on 07/13/2005 12:03:23 PM PDT by Richard Poe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Bumping this thread for future reference, and Richard could you ping me for the next installment(s)?

This is excellent, even though I knew of most of it, it's good to refresh the memory. We need to start gearing up for the battle ahead.


66 posted on 07/13/2005 12:28:03 PM PDT by clyde260 (Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Could you also ping me? I find this very interesting. Wow!!! Just the little research I've done within the past hour or so has opened up a lot of questions about the Clintons.


67 posted on 07/13/2005 12:36:17 PM PDT by loreldan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace; Richard Poe
Crosslinked:

-Hillary Clinton- archives, comments, and opposition research --

68 posted on 07/13/2005 12:55:00 PM PDT by backhoe (Has that Clinton "Legacy" made *you* feel safer, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

That's a fascinating idea. A very good idea indeed!


69 posted on 07/13/2005 12:55:29 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Baynative

Gennifer Flowers tells the story, that she had a roommate. And Terry Lenzer's boys came calling. These guys asked her roommate if Gennifer was the kind of girl who might commit suicide. Of course, that was a veiled threat, but Gennifer had the tapes and probably some other dirt that she has never revealed as an insurance policy. And of course, there was Marcia Lewis, Monica's mother who had her keep the famous stained dress. Some in the media never understood why Monica kept the dress. It was a life insurance policy, because Marcia Lewis has been quoted as saying that she did not want Monica to end up like Mary Mahoney. And then of course there was the strange case of Betty Curry's brother who had an untimely accident at a timely time for the Clinton crowd if Betty Curry ever had any thoughts of spilling what she knew.


70 posted on 07/13/2005 1:59:58 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

This woman must be stopped from destroying America.
Her new website
http://www.hillaryclinton.com needs some visitors :+}


71 posted on 07/13/2005 4:39:16 PM PDT by Cincinna (BEWARE HILLARY and her HINO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

Bump


72 posted on 07/13/2005 7:16:24 PM PDT by woofie (I Predict...... Dr. Neil Clark Warren will someday kill his wife and stop being pleasant to others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
schippers is a hero bump
ALFRED E."What, me worry?" CLINTON + CRAZY HIL MAD COVER STORY

THE THREAT OF TERRORISM IS AS CLOSE AS A CLINTON IS TO THE OVAL OFFICE

73 posted on 07/13/2005 7:23:05 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
We know Jerry Parks was murdered. His killers still run free. These are America's Most Wanted.
74 posted on 07/13/2005 7:31:24 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: loreldan
That's a really good question about why more conservative journalists did not investigate the Foster murder and other Clinton crimes. I'm sure there are many reasons for their lack of action on this case. One good possibility is that while about 15% of mainstream journalists are Republicans, it seems like there are just a few conservative mainstream media outlets--perhaps 5% of the total. I can only think of two offhand: the Washington Times and the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. So it's likely that some of the conservative journalists were blocked from investigating the Foster murder by executives in their organization who believed that reporting on this story would make their publication look like a "right-wing" publication. Part of the problem also may be that conservative reporters didn't jump on the Foster story quickly enough and that gave the Clintons too much time to destroy evidence and spin the story to create a public perception that Foster committed suicide.

If you recall the Watergate scandal, the news media jumped all over that story right from the beginning and worked furiously to generate the perception among the public that Nixon's men had comitted major crimes. I think also the Clintons were much more willing (than Nixon) to use any and all forms of executive power to squelch a real investigation into Foster's death. When you're part of a small minority among journalists, it's also difficult to attack the White House without rock-solid damning evidence (such as a confession by a hit man), but instead with mountains of circumstantial evidence. I think that's also what stopped Ken Starr from more agressive questioning of the Foster suicide theory. And finally you have item #3 from my earlier post: major fear among journalists of retaliation of all kinds (including violence) by the Clintons. These are my leading theories for why conservative mainstream journalists didn't publish more investigative articles about the Clintons. I'm sure there are some other reasons.

75 posted on 07/13/2005 9:41:02 PM PDT by carl in alaska (Hey John Kerry...we don't do this just for "entertainment.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: defenderSD

(((( Ping ))))


76 posted on 07/13/2005 9:42:56 PM PDT by carl in alaska (Hey John Kerry...we don't do this just for "entertainment.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

bttt


77 posted on 07/13/2005 9:45:30 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe

I've often wondered if the McCain-Feingold Campaign finanace laws were ultimately intended to regulate information (political & otherwise) on the Internet / talk-radio.

By the way, I'm currently reading your book...it's by my bedside right now!


78 posted on 07/13/2005 9:56:14 PM PDT by vidbizz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biblebelter
And nothing ever came out of the search for Chandra Levy's killer either. Not that anyone really searched very hard to begin with...
So much has just slipped away into the Memory Hole.
79 posted on 07/14/2005 2:01:53 PM PDT by philman_36 ("It’s a legal document, and legal documents do not change." Scalia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: loreldan

You haven't been paying attention. It is well documented.


80 posted on 07/14/2005 2:20:24 PM PDT by Scarlet Pimpernel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson