Posted on 07/12/2005 9:31:25 PM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson
Karl Rove, Whistleblower
He told the truth about Joe Wilson.
Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:01 a.m. EDT
Democrats and most of the Beltway press corps are baying for Karl Rove's head over his role in exposing a case of CIA nepotism involving Joe Wilson and his wife, Valerie Plame. On the contrary, we'd say the White House political guru deserves a prize--perhaps the next iteration of the "Truth-Telling" award that The Nation magazine bestowed upon Mr. Wilson before the Senate Intelligence Committee exposed him as a fraud.
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
We just gotta educate ourselves to the facts as we know them, remember who's lied to us in the past, and go with our guts. Good eggs here are always ready to admit when we've been proven wrong.
That said, the Financial Times is rated the top paper in the world, while the fairy tale NY Times is 6 th and doesn't deserve that position. The paper cited in your reference doesn't even rank, but feel free to correct me. The Financial Times indicates there is more here that we wish to admit. Reference:
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/c2d48ad0-f18b-11d9-9c3e-00000e2511c8.html
Excerpts: Pressure builds over Rove CIA leak' By Holly Yeager in Washington Published: July 10 2005 23:15 | Last updated: July 11 2005 23:44 "Karl Rove
The White House on Monday faced intensifying pressure over the role that Karl Rove, the president's top political adviser, may have played in leaking the identity of a covert Central Intelligence Agency officer."
POINT: It is illegal to disclose the name of a CIA covert agent even if ROVE is a WHISTLEBLOWER.
"Scott McClellan, the White House spokesman, was visibly uncomfortable on Monday as he faced heavy questioning about the case. We're not going to get into commenting on an ongoing criminal investigation from this podium, he said."
Let's let the investigators go with this one, as the White House says. Let us not jump on an opinion that is not substantiated and offered by a third rate paper. CASE CLOSED.
Cheers!
I do not consider the Wall Street Journal a third rate paper.
Excellent thread
I laughed when I saw that -- this is going to backfire on the media once again -- you would think they would get a clue!
WSJ third rate, no, but not first rate as the FT and certainly the emphasis is on OPINION in http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110006955
David Corn and Katrina vanden Heuvel make my skin crawl.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.