Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Float Names of Hispanics for Court
Associated Press ^ | July 12, 2005 | DEB RIECHMANN and DAVID ESPO

Posted on 07/12/2005 9:20:29 PM PDT by RWR8189

WASHINGTON (AP) - Top Senate Democrats floated the names of potential candidates for the Supreme Court on Tuesday in a meeting with President Bush, describing them as the type of nominee who could avoid a fierce confirmation battle.

Several officials familiar with the discussion said Judge Sonia Sotomayor of the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals and Judge Ed Prado of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, both of whom are Hispanic, were among the names mentioned as Bush met with key lawmakers from both parties to discuss the first high court vacancy in 11 years.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity, noting a commitment by those involved not to discuss names.

Bush was noncommittal about his choice to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has resigned effective with the confirmation of her successor. "I'm going to be deliberate in the process," he told reporters at the White House.

Bush "didn't give us any names" Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada said after the session had broken up.

Besides Reid, Bush met with Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee; Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont, the ranking Democrat on the committee; and Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn. Also in the room was Vice President Dick Cheney and White House Chief of Staff Andy Card.

The administration has consulted widely with Democrats in the 10 days since O'Connor announced her plans to resign, and the early morning session at the White House was part of that effort.

The meeting came at a time when the president is under pressure from conservatives who want a court that will reverse precedent on rulings on abortion rights, affirmative action, homosexual rights and other social issues. Some conservatives have criticized Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, for example, questioning whether he would vote to overturn the landmark 1973 court ruling that gave women the constitutional right to an abortion. For their part, Democrats are urging Bush to seek a "consensus candidate," one who would win confirmation without a bitter struggle.

Democrats have relatively little leverage in purely numerical terms. Republicans hold 55 seats in the Senate and can confirm any of Bush's picks unless Democrats mount a filibuster. That would require 60 votes in the 100-member chamber.

Democrats have done extensive research on dozens of potential replacements for O'Connor. Officials said that Leahy suggested the names of Sotomayor and Prado and others.

According to an official government Web site, Sotomayor was named a U.S. District Court judge in 1991 by former President George H.W. Bush, the president's father, and confirmed in August 1992. President Clinton nominated her for a seat on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in 1997, and she was confirmed in 1998.

President Reagan nominated Prado to a seat on the U.S. District Court in 1984. The current President Bush picked him for his current post in 2003, and he was confirmed on a vote of 97-0.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush43; oconnor; prado; reid; rino; rinos; sandradayoconnor; scotus; shortlist; sotomayor; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
It will be the office of the President to NOMINATE, and, with the advice and consent of the Senate, to APPOINT. There will, of course, be no exertion of CHOICE on the part of the Senate. They may defeat one choice of the Executive, and oblige him to make another; but they cannot themselves CHOOSE, they can only ratify or reject the choice of the President. They might even entertain a preference to some other person, at the very moment they were assenting to the one proposed, because there might be no positive ground of opposition to him; and they could not be sure, if they withheld their assent, that the subsequent nomination would fall upon their own favorite, or upon any other person in their estimation more meritorious than the one rejected. Thus it could hardly happen, that the majority of the Senate would feel any other complacency towards the object of an appointment than such as the appearances of merit might inspire, and the proofs of the want of it destroy.

Federalist No. 66

1 posted on 07/12/2005 9:20:39 PM PDT by RWR8189
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
he was confirmed on a vote of 97-0.

All I need to know about Prado.

2 posted on 07/12/2005 9:24:30 PM PDT by neodad (I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast, for I intend to go in harm's way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Personally.. I'd go with..

Janice Rogers Brown..

Michael Luttig..

Edith Hollan Jones..

---
The dems are doing what they do best, pandering for votes.


3 posted on 07/12/2005 9:26:23 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... "To remain silent when they should protest makes cowards of men." -- THOMAS JEFFERSON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

It's interesting how the party that tries to convince everyone that we're in a pure democracy--that if Bush rejects their suggestions he's somehow not "including" them in something they have no part of--keeps flailing away to no visible result. I have complaints about how the republicans have done some things in the last few years, but I can't see how anything they've done wrong has really benefitted the dems. The Democrat party truly is the whining-till-they-get-something party.


4 posted on 07/12/2005 9:26:32 PM PDT by Dr.Hilarious (If Al Qaeda took over the judiciary and mainstream media, would we know the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
I heard McCain and he sounded like a mad hardass this time. Elections have consequences, he said. The President will nominate, and then get an up-and-down vote in the Senate, not a filibuster.

What McCain didn't say, but what we all know, is that DEMOCRATS ARE SCUMMIER THAN SLIME.
5 posted on 07/12/2005 9:27:27 PM PDT by Tax Government (Put down the judicial insurrection. Contribute to FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Sonia Sotomayor was regarded as John Kerry's likely #1 choice for the Supreme Court..


6 posted on 07/12/2005 9:27:54 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Don't you have to win a few elections and be in charge to name court picks ?

The RATS live in total denial of their situation.
7 posted on 07/12/2005 9:28:43 PM PDT by John Lenin (Everything the RATS have done since 2000 has been a boomerang disaster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
PS. There's a DraftPrado website, fwiw.
8 posted on 07/12/2005 9:29:57 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
IF we must have a Hispanic whats wrong with Miguel Estrada?
9 posted on 07/12/2005 9:30:07 PM PDT by Echo Talon (http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

"The officials spoke on condition of anonymity.."

I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you, to find that the dems are leaking to the press!


10 posted on 07/12/2005 9:31:48 PM PDT by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
I'd love to see this Hispanic on the court --


11 posted on 07/12/2005 9:33:42 PM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neodad

Yep. I got a digit the Rats can all "float" on, right back at `em.


12 posted on 07/12/2005 9:35:01 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile ("Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist." -- John Adams. "F that." -- SCOTUS, in Kelo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

BTW, I read in some other articles that the Dems also recommended U.S. District Court Judge Ricardo Hinojosa as an option. Although that sounds like a kiss of death, I've seen his name bandied about before as a potential replacement for Rehnquist, and he's supposedly regarded as a conservative. I don't know much else about him, except that he chairs the U.S. Sentencing Commission.


13 posted on 07/12/2005 9:35:25 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Sonia Sotomayor? The dims were floating her name in 2004 if Kerry won. They got to be kidding.

http://www.civilrights.org/issues/nominations/details.cfm?id=25534 http://www.ouramericanvalues.org/glb_news_article.php?id=11010401 http://www.puertorico-herald.org/issues/2004/vol8n44/Media3-en.shtml

14 posted on 07/12/2005 9:36:24 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
Dear Dumbocrats:

You LOST!!!

You do NOT get to pick Nominees!

The President DOES!

Jack.

15 posted on 07/12/2005 9:36:54 PM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Well gosh Golly Gee .. wasn't that nice of the dems ..


16 posted on 07/12/2005 9:38:34 PM PDT by Mo1 (We will stay in the fight until the fight is won ~~~ President G.W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

So, the Democrats are dictating the terms of Bush's surrender. The fact that the President even lets these arrogant horse's patoots into the White House just astounds me.


17 posted on 07/12/2005 9:54:50 PM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

Golden Rule in this, as in all other matters regarding the body politic:

If the dhimmis like something, do the exact opposite.


18 posted on 07/13/2005 2:51:53 AM PDT by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon

Nothing. He's my #1 choice for reasons stated below:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1440218/posts?page=9#9

Am not sure, but I think Mr. Estrada may not want his name to be in consideration for this. But no bones about it, he would be the outstanding choice, followed by Janice Brown... let's see the 'diversity-open Tent' dhimmicrats try and explain opposing these two...


19 posted on 07/13/2005 2:56:19 AM PDT by CGVet58 (God has granted us Liberty, and we owe Him Courage in return)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CGVet58
I like Mr. Luttig.

Senator Coburn on Fox and Friends.
20 posted on 07/13/2005 6:24:18 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson