Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RWR8189
he was confirmed on a vote of 97-0.

All I need to know about Prado.

2 posted on 07/12/2005 9:24:30 PM PDT by neodad (I wish to have no connection with any ship that does not sail fast, for I intend to go in harm's way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: neodad

Yep. I got a digit the Rats can all "float" on, right back at `em.


12 posted on 07/12/2005 9:35:01 PM PDT by LibertarianInExile ("Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist." -- John Adams. "F that." -- SCOTUS, in Kelo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: neodad

"he was confirmed on a vote of 97-0.

All I need to know about Prado."



Don't be so hasty. Scalia was confirmed for the Supreme Court like 98-0. When the Democrats decide not to oppose a nominee, it often turns out to be unanimous.

But if Prado was named to the U.S. District Court in 1984 he's probably over 60, and thus not a good Supreme Court pick even if he's a solid conservative.


21 posted on 07/13/2005 7:09:28 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson