Posted on 07/12/2005 2:07:09 PM PDT by MaineVoter2002
Dems Leak Bush's Court Short List
Top Senate Democrats floated the names of potential candidates for the Supreme Court on Tuesday in a meeting with President Bush, describing them as...
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Because Kerry was slightly worse?
why do you always believe what you read?
as for working for Bush's re-election, well I guess you just forgot what 1993-94 was like, if you have to ask that question
This article reports precisely nothing about Bush's thinking, list of potential judicial candidates, or eventual nominee. Untwist your panties.
that's nonsense.
Also I cant remember the last time a SOCTUS decided a trade issue, that is congress's relm.
You have fallen for the same foolish nothin about the SCOTUS that liberals have. You think it is a super legislature. Who cares if a SCOTUS is anti or pro NAFTA, frankly I'd rather not know becasue it is irrelevant
someone here once said that if there was such a thing as a Conservative Grocery Stroe, Newsmanx would be avaliable at the checkout counter
I hear ya.....one can tell who was posting during the last election, all day, every day, and those that were too busy to post because they were out in the field working...I am sure you are the type who has never missed a vote :)
As for the Dems, you can be as nice as you want, but they're never going to return the favor. I think Bush shouldn't waste his time going that route.
I agree completely....total waste of time.
Let us pray that Pres. Bush keeps his word to the party faithful.
Others have pretty well debunked the misleading headline Newsmax put on this article, but I'm sorry ... the more I look at it the more appalled I am.
That headline is not worthy of a college freshman's hobby blog, much less a site that fancies itself a legitimate news source.
I hear a loud sucking sound.....you guys are pathetic. But make for a good laugh. Following around an old lady.....LOL!!!!!
It seems to me this is an attempt by the democrats to pick the nominee.
I agree, I'm hoping and praying for that, too. I think Bush is ethical and honest, but I think that his desire to appear fair gets in his way and instead makes him appear weak (and hence, jackal-food for the Dems).
As I understand it the president picked Thompson to help him get the nominees throught the process...the last time the President did that, it was Dick Chaney helping GW to pick a VP candidate.
When Carl posts a thread here, I pay more attention to it than some other items from NewsMax.
I know. Screwed again.
Exactly! Hey, we could hope, couldn't we?
The real reason for Demonrat Senators to float (on policy grounds) unnominatable Hispanic Judges????? Dingy Harry/Leaky Leahy, et al.: "Why, we haven't a racist bone in our bodies. Buttah jes would not melt in ouah mouths. We suggested just two names and BOTH were Hispanic." Do not underestimate the pain of the Demonrat hypocrites when they were nailed as the racists that they are for opposing Estrada because of his potential as a SCOTUS nominee. An Hispanic nominee who meets the usual GOP litmus tests will seriously damage the Demonrats. So would the nomination of a Janice Rogers Brown
It doesn't matter how posted it, the title is erroneous.
O'Conner resigned pending the confirmation of her successor. If nobody is apointed, she will still be on the court. Replace her and be done with it.
On a serious note, please try to stop the reflexive reactions to the RATS' gambits. It'll eat you alive. Step back and look at the big picture.
They just can't help themselves; it's like a disease there's no cure or medicine for.
And how "old" ar you,pet, 11?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.